<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Biting the Hand that Slaps You (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872</link>
<description>Much has (rightly) been made of the abuses of detainees in Guantanamo Bay. &#160;While some say torture is a necessary evil in the fight against terrorism, others say that the United States has given up the moral high ground and cannot expect respect if these practices continue.&lt;p>
There may be another unintended consequence: Guantanamo turns some of its detainees into terrorists.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:47:07 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:50:37 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: basd stuff in the US</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#11</link>
<description>e.g. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's torture dens.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:50:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#10</link>
<description>&lt;i>Ah, yes, another media investigation which finds the US at fault at Gitmo. What a shock.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It's that damned liberal bias that reality has. &#160;When you're at fault, it's not hard to be found at fault.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:46:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#9</link>
<description>It's true, the problem goes tremendously beyond the strategic error of treating prisoners in Guantanamo Bay in such a way as to make them more likely to engage in terrorism upon their release. &#160;The US has foreign policies which alienate other countrie</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:50:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>Maybe they knew something we didn't.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Is that why they were released?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Those men were problems before, and if released, would become problems again.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Sure, but there's a big difference between "being a problem" back home and killing hun</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:29:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#7</link>
<description>That's kinda the thing I've never gotten about opposition to it. On the one hand, you could call it a rallying point but on the other hand, no one seems to actually have rallied around it for the purposes of addressing similar prisons the US operates in ot</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:27:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>The Afghanis knew who he was before he was detained by the United States&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Maybe they knew something we didn't.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Since you apparently didn't actually read the article, let me re-iterate: these people are becoming terrorists because of their mi</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:44:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#5</link>
<description>&lt;i>Mohammed Naim Farouq doesn't sound like a good guy. What he wasn't, before his detention, was a terrorist (at least according to the US, which finally had to let him go because there was no evidence that he was one).&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's nitpicking over a defi</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:25:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>Are there no competing rationales for why released Gitmo prisoners might resurface as radical Islamists? Like: they were radical Islamists from the start, but lied about their level of involvement.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I don't see any part of the article that's based</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:35:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#3</link>
<description>One of the saddest things about the Gitmo situation is that people are outraged about it and accepting of much worse abuse, neglect, and violence happening to American citizens inside state prisons.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:31:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#2</link>
<description>Radical Islamists hold a certain kind of &lt;em>belief&lt;/em>. Terrorists commit (or conspire to commit) certain &lt;em>actions&lt;/em>. Not all radical Islamists (what do you mean by that, anyway?) are terrorists, and many terrorists are not radical Islamists, or ev</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:03:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Biting the Hand that Slaps You</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/124543/872#1</link>
<description>Ah, yes, another media investigation which finds the US at fault at Gitmo. What a shock.&lt;p>&#10;Are there no competing rationales for why released Gitmo prisoners might resurface as radical Islamists? Like: they were radical Islamists &lt;i>from the start&lt;/i>, bu</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:29:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>