<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Feel Lucky?  Try To Google Google's Privacy Policy. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147</link>
<description>It all started with a minor blow up between a trade group and the internet search giant over publicizing Google's privacy policy.  In the course of a week, it has gone from that minor blow up to an active assault on Google over its lack of complying with industry standards on publishing their privacy policies.  Further, their failure isn't simply a case of not keeping up with industry standards, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7434558.stm">they're also breaking the law&lt;/a>.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:11:22 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:38:02 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>WMK: What does Google get?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#7</link>
<description>What does Google get out of refusing to comply with this law?&lt;p>&#10;I can imagine some kind of meeting room at Google with an executive exclaiming that bending to this effort to coerce/regulate their content by legal decree: &lt;br>&#10;" ...it's like, this violates</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:38:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: That's a lot of information.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#6</link>
<description>I don't believe google is getting a free pass on the spirit of the law. So long as someone interested in viewing the privacy policy has reasonable access to it, then I believe we're all ok. A major part of the internet is design. You can't reasonably list </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:04:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: That's a lot of information.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#5</link>
<description>Too bad it's basically bad information.&lt;br>&lt;br>This is the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001333----000-.html">law regarding what the Surgeon General's warning&lt;/a> has to say, in addition to where it ne</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 20:56:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Other Legal Wastes Of Time:</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#4</link>
<description>But the surgeon general's warning is on the back of the carton, the ingredients are in the smallest print possible and the lotto odds just say, "odds depend on number of participants." I don't think google has actively make their privacy policy difficult t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:10:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Other Legal Wastes Of Time:</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#3</link>
<description>1. Printing the Surgeon General warning on the packages of cigarettes.&lt;br>&lt;br>2. Printing the actual odds of someone winning the lottery.&lt;br>&lt;br>3. Printing the nutritional content of processed foods.&lt;br>&lt;br>4. Printing the active ingredients on most of th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:46:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Fly 'cause it's sittin' on Daytons</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#2</link>
<description>I love how California has taken it upon itself to regulate the internet. Thanks a lot California. I think local governments do this because the things they should be doing are boring. The mayor and city council where I live, for example, are fixated with s</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:31:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: So Lucky Maybe I Should Hit Up The Casinos</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/4/1775/37147#1</link>
<description>I'll go Shane's subQ comment and the "Feel Lucky?" headline one better: Go to google, type in "privacy policy" and hit "I'm Feeling Lucky" and you are taken directly to a page dominated by the following in blue block letters: "Google Privacy Policy." That </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:10:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>