<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Should I Stay Or Should I Go? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334</link>
<description>It was a brief four months ago when we &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/4/124048/1147">reported on Brett Favre's decision to retire&lt;/a> after 17 years in the NFL, 16 of which he spent quarterbacking the Green Bay Packers.  Now it seems the superstar is having &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=768751">second thoughts about retirement&lt;/a> and wants back in.  The team seems to be having a problem accommodating his request.  All this comes down</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:55:59 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:50:00 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: And I say why shouldn't he?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#6</link>
<description>I'd love to see him call the Packers' bluff and show up to training camp as a $12M/year backup QB.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:50:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Why The Attention?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#5</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; I know this isn't the busiest news cycle for sports- and it goes to show how little Americans care about the Tour de France without one of ours contending- but why won't this story leave the television? What is it that attracts both reporters</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:49:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: And I say why shouldn't he?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#4</link>
<description>I think the Packers are stupid to have ever wanted Favre gone and should put him out there as the starter tomorrow. That's the best football decision to make and the best Packer mystique move to make. Favre playing for someone else doesn't hurt the Pack bu</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:27:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: And I say why shouldn't he?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#3</link>
<description>I agree Favre has no place on the Packers; he's burned all those bridges within the past week. &#160;I agree if the Packers have the say so, they should have veto power over his playing on any team they will play twice during the season. &#160;You say he's</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:30:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: This is stupid.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#2</link>
<description>There's just no circumstances under which Brett Favre should come back for another team. The guy's a megolomaniac for wanting to and the Pack front office can't keep from tripping over themselves if they honestly think letting him go somewhere else is a go</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:38:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: This is stupid.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/15/163556/334#1</link>
<description>If Favre thinks he's still got something in the tank, then he should be allowed the opportunity to show it -- on the field, in uniform, during the regular NFL season.  But when he announced his retirement, he should have taken the advice he's offering the </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:34:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>