<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>It's Not Illegal To Be An Asshole ... Yet. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558</link>
<description>Guy Earle claims to be an edgy stand up comic and one who will fight back if heckled.  So, last year when he was heckled during a performance, he responded in kind.  Used a bit of abusive language, he did.  Made disparaging remarks about the sexual orientation of the hecklers, he did.  He says it's allowed as he's a bit of an asshole and it's part of his act.  Apparently, not everyone agrees because he's facing a hearing in front of a provincial Human Rights Tribunal.  He sees it as an &lt;a rel="nofollow" hre</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:42:49 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:47:20 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#45</link>
<description>She had a Spaghetti strap shirt (straps had to be at least 2 inches wide, or as wide as the ID badge [size of a credit card]), "excessively low-cut" top (no strict definition on that one, it was up to "management discretion"- and this woman was falling out</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:47:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#44</link>
<description>I know it sounds ridiculous on its face but honestly, it's a solid argument that a workplace dress code creates a hostile work environment. Sure there are arguments that the company has an interest in maintaining order and (if the worker has access to clie</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:53:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Unsurprising, Really</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#43</link>
<description>Certain lesbians in Vancouver are among the most humourless, angry people I've ever met in my life. &#160;They hate men, they hate most women, nothing is ever good enough, and to top it all off they make their dogs wear stupid fucking handkerchiefs around </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 13:41:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#42</link>
<description>So, what was she wearing? &#160;Inquiring minds want to know!</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:26:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#41</link>
<description>Fun fact: I disciplined an employee because she was out of dress code (WAY out of dress code) and she claimed that me punishing her for violating a document she'd signed in three places (explicitly outlining that she would be punished for violating it) was</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:32:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#40</link>
<description>But that's a work place environment which has different conventions. In America, for the most part, these things are judged based on civil case law and not enshrined criminal law. If everyone at your workplace enjoys greeting one another by saying, "Fags s</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:20:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#39</link>
<description>If that is in fact an accurate description of Canadian law, then Canadian society has turned into a far creepier place than I had ever suspected. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:55:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#38</link>
<description>I would much rather be a prig than a bigot. &#160;Other than that, your comment doesn't really deserve a reply. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:52:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#37</link>
<description>Canadian law is very similar to American law in that it addresses protected classes. &#160;For example, I once worked at a call center as a sales manager and through ineptitude and apathy on the part of my employer was forced to assume many roles and respo</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:36:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#36</link>
<description>Fuck, that happened to me once back in the late 70s. &#160;It wasn't funny.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:31:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#35</link>
<description>You'd have to try it out and let us know what happens.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:27:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#34</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>In Canada, publicly saying something like "Fags are horrible people" &#160;would make you a criminal&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>See, I don't know much about Canadian law. If I were to say, for instance, "Fags are wicked gay," would that earn me a jail </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:11:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: Is it a crime not to be George Carlin?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#33</link>
<description>Worse, if there is a significant amount of interpretation necessary of such a vague law. Not saying it is right, just saying...&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:04:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#32</link>
<description>In Canada, publicly saying something like "Fags are horrible people" &#160;would make you a criminal.&lt;p>&#10;For better or worse Canada has laws against hate speech.&lt;p>&#10;So when visiting, it's prudent to talk nice while you're there.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:02:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Truth?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#31</link>
<description>oh good, I was afraid great grand dad died for nothing.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:05:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Truth?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#30</link>
<description>"Fifteen cents...mostly pennies, probably."&lt;p>&#10;Of course back then a plate of spaghetti and meatballs only cost a nickel.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:29:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Truth?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>"Humor must in some way be based upon truth"&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Agreed, but where is the truth in your joke?&lt;p>&#10;Copper wire made from pennies? -No...copper wire existed long before the penny.&lt;p>&#10;Two Jews fighting over a penny? &#160;-Even if they were strong enough</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:40:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: No free speech in Canada</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#28</link>
<description>All countries more "progressive" than the US have speech restrictions. It's because the guiding principle of liberalism is equality, in the universal or you might say cosmic sense.&lt;p>&#10;See this &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.plastic.com/comments.html;si</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:37:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Is it a crime not to be George Carlin?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#27</link>
<description>Is that better or worse for his case?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:52:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: No free speech in Canada</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#26</link>
<description>Dude, wtf is wrong with Canada? For my money, skeptic's point of view is being deprecated more and more in common American society. As races actually mix, people are happier to know how people really feel so they can act accordingly, and they're tired of n</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:52:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#25</link>
<description>"I didn't say that Jews can make fun of anyone they want"&lt;p>&#10;But that's how it works in practice. Jews (blacks, fags, etc.) can make fun of whites all they want, but if whites make fun of Jews (etc.) it's 'bigotry'. If saying certain things really is a 'cr</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:26:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#24</link>
<description>I didn't say that Jews can make fun of anyone they want (and your comment is so obtuse that it seems to be a deliberate misunderstanding), I said that anti-Semitic jokes are in bad taste unless they are made ironically by Jews; in other words, Jews can mak</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:50:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Yep</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#23</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; I understand the general rule in situations like this is that the defendant is the weakest link in the case. Which makes sense: if it was clearly wrong, there'd be no publicity, and if clearly right, no charges would be brought.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:46:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: It's Not Illegal To Be An Asshole ... Yet.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#22</link>
<description>Unfortunately for free speech in Canada, it will be hard to work up some enthusiasm for this guy because &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/guyzini"> he's just not that funny &lt;/a> . </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:03:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Whua?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>In Canada you could be jailed for that.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;What? &#160;Making fun of a puppet?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:12:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#20</link>
<description>In Canada you could be jailed for that.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:18:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#19</link>
<description>What's 18 inches long and hangs in front on an asshole?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://web.syr.edu/~jswiener/alfstar.jpg">Shumway's tie.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;The humor never stops.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:12:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: No free speech in Canada</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#18</link>
<description>Canadian 'hate speech' laws are used to &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://ezralevant.com/2008/07/chrc-lawyer-threatens-me-with.html">harass&lt;/a> and &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://ezralevant.com/2008/01/whats-this-all-about.html">hopefully intimidate journalis</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:11:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#17</link>
<description>"much like anti-Semitic jokes or comments (except when uttered ironically by Jews) "&lt;p>&#10;So Jews can make fun of whomever they want, but no one else can joke about the Jews? What bullshit.&lt;p>&#10;By the way, you know who invented copper wire? Two Jews fighting </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:49:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#16</link>
<description>Worse yet, what if you're a man &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.menshairstyles.net/d/14803-2/l_hair+style+for+man+with+long+hair.jpg">trapped in a lesbian's haircut&lt;/a>?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:58:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: What did they do?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>Destroy all their Indigo Girls CDs?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That certainly won't bring them closer to fine.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:26:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: What did they do?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#14</link>
<description>Destroy all their Indigo Girls CDs?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:16:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#13</link>
<description>What if the Lesbians aren't into lesbianism?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:01:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Could be worse</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#12</link>
<description>I understand that Michael Richards also responds poorly to being heckled.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: No, that's not what I said.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#11</link>
<description>Chances are, Earle was not really guilty of hate speech. &#160;However, without knowing exactly what he said, I can't be sure of that. &#160;And even if he had been guilty of hate speech it was still inappropriate for the lady in question to assault him. &amp;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:48:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: No, that's not what I said.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#10</link>
<description>I didn't say he couldn't possibly be convicted of anything.  What I'm saying is that taking what has been reported about what was said and done, I don't think he could be convicted of a hate crime (which is what he's really being charged with).  As it's re</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:40:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: hecklers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#9</link>
<description>I think that it is possible to heckle graciously. &#160;Many stand-up comedians enjoy a good heckle, since it gives them more material to joke about. &#160;Paula Poundstone, for example, is brilliant at replying to hecklers. &#160;It's the best thing in he</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:37:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#8</link>
<description>I know that there are a lot of people who disagree with the Canadian law which prohibits the promotion of hatred against minority groups. &#160;Some of the other replies to my comment specifically say that any speech is acceptable to them, no matter what i</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:31:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#7</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Hecklers are obligated to accept with good grace the consequences of their own heckling&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Lesbians are obligated to accept with good grace the consequences of their own lesbianism.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:12:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#6</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think that I would have to hear a recording of this exchange (if one exists) before I could really decide if it constitutes a hate crime&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>How could it possibly be a "hate crime"? What could possibly be said that would be bad</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:09:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#5</link>
<description>Well, no it's nothing like a boxing match.  The audience is there to listen to the comic's routine -- at least that's what everybody else other than the two lesbians were there for.  What right did they have to interrupt Earle's routine with their heckling</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:31:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Could be worse</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#4</link>
<description>The hecklers should be thankful they weren't at a Bill Hicks show.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:06:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#3</link>
<description>If you heckle and don't get shot, you should consider yourself lucky. I don't need to hear a recording because there isn't anything he shouldn't be allowed to say to them as far as I'm concerned.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:59:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>Hecklers are obligated to &lt;b>accept with good grace&lt;/b> the consequences of their own heckling.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Therein lies the problem. If hecklers had good grace, they wouldn't be heckling.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:34:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Mixed feelings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/7/28/155339/558#1</link>
<description>I feel that anti-gay jokes or comments, much like anti-Semitic jokes or comments (except when uttered ironically by Jews) are always in bad taste, and cannot actually be funny. &#160;Humor must in some way be based upon truth, not lies. &#160;But whether s</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:49:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>