<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Absolute Immunity?  Absolutely Not Says Court. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/1/162541/3901</link>
<description>Back when the House and Senate Judiciary Committees sought to have a little dialogue with members of the White House staff over the case of some &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy">dismissed US attorneys&lt;/a>, the word sent back to Capital Hill was a very firm "no."  No, they would not be testifying before Congress because they had "absolute immunity" from congressional subpoenas.  Because Congress really, really did want to talk to these people, the </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:17:04 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:59:44 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: moot point</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/1/162541/3901#4</link>
<description>Actually, I think it's a very interesting legal question, just not one which will be answered in a timely enough fashion to be of any use. If McCain wins and Bolten, et al., are pardoned, there's no reason to issue a ruling. If Obama wins, they might be pa</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:59:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: moot point</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/1/162541/3901#3</link>
<description>It's odd how we both landed on the same word to describe what's at issue here -- moot.  But, I have the feeling we have different interpretations of what that word means.  My meaning is "it's open to question but extremely worthy of an answer."  Your meani</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:37:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: moot point</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/1/162541/3901#2</link>
<description>This won't get settled quickly enough to matter. The White House will appeal, and appeal again to SCOTUS if that answer isn't what they want, and by that time a new administration will be in place. If it's McCain, it'll be blanket parsons for all, and if i</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:05:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Never Say Never.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/1/162541/3901#1</link>
<description>If my father passed along one useful value to me it was to avoid people who assert absolutes.  If a person assures you something will &lt;b>always&lt;/b> work or &lt;b>never&lt;/b> break or cost you money, move along to the next thing.  Unfortunately, the people who h</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:05:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>