<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II) (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993</link>
<description>I originally wasn't going to write this up as my bile rises everytime I see or hear the name Danieal Kelly.  Not that Kelly was a bad person; she was a 14-year-old kid who had the bad luck to be born with cerebral palsy and a pair of bottom feeders for parents.  Danieal is beyond anyone's help now and, apparently, was beneath the concern of anyone who should have given a shit about her while she was alive.  She died two years ago, starved to death in a home where her mother oversaw her "care."  She died as </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:39:40 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:56:12 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: children vs. puppies</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#38</link>
<description>It's true, a person who cannot successfully raise a puppy also cannot successfully raise a child. &#160;But it is not true that a person who can successfully raise a puppy can also successfully raise a child. &#160;Children are more difficult. &#160;So ide</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:56:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: children vs. puppies</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#37</link>
<description>The correlation doesn't have to be exact, it's only a low bar. &#160;If you can't make it over that minimum requirement, you definitely don't have the skills to be a parent.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:33:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: the end of the world</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#36</link>
<description>It does seem likely that some kind of massive die-off lies in the future of the human race. &#160;It could well involve the spread of some catastrophic pandemic, either of accidental or deliberate origin, as you imagine. &#160;Global warming, with conseque</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:55:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WMK: Re: the corporate dystopia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#35</link>
<description>The problem does seem dire and your forecast for environmental collapse in spite of SOME (or even many) people getting it into their heads to live more sustainably due to the inexorable ever increasing weight of sheer population volume seems depressingly r</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:41:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: children vs. puppies</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#34</link>
<description>Although this is a charming suggestion, I wouldn't really want to implement it. &#160;I do not believe that there is an exact correlation between the ability to raise a puppy and the ability to raise a child. &#160;There is certainly SOME connection, but n</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:12:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: the corporate dystopia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#33</link>
<description>I agree that if it turns out to be corporations, rather than democratically elected governments, who regulate families or reproduction, the result would be quite unpleasant and would not accomplish what I would hope to accomplish through reproductive regul</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:55:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WMK: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#32</link>
<description>This 'parenting license' thing you propose is a massive piece of social engineering - that right there should tell you how improbable it is that it will ever be implemented. &#160;If it were ever made into a law - the majority of the worlds population woul</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:59:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#31</link>
<description>Good question. &#160;I do not have a dream of maintaining any kind of racial balance - indeed, I believe that human beings of every ethnicity are members of the human race, and so even the concept of "racial balance" is a misnomer at best. &#160;My concern</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:59:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: The Kellys may not end up profiting from this.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#30</link>
<description>If the suit gets to trial, then your assessment is spot on, MayorBob. That said, I think the hurdles in getting the lawsuit to trial are high and numerous.&lt;p>&#10;The big question is whether the Kellys have standing; that is to say, if the court decides they h</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:36:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: pretzel logic</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#29</link>
<description>You think the answer to this situation is &lt;i>less&lt;/i> government? &#160;How would that have helped Danieal?&lt;p>&#10;We had less government here in Hawaii, and that means &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=4845754">our high-profile ch</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:35:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#28</link>
<description>You don't need any of that. &#160;All you would have to do to qualify for a Parenting License is raise a puppy to be a healthy (mentally and physically) adult dog. &#160;If you can't do that, you can't be a parent.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:29:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Lacking smoking lore</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#27</link>
<description>Isn't the burning tip of a cigarette sometimes called a coal?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:26:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Fire chief Bunyan</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>then flicking the coal ...&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I wouldn't mess with a guy who smokes the kind of cigarettes that you can flick coal from.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:59:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#25</link>
<description>Allow me to take a mulligan on my "Doomed?" comment. &#160;I re-read who was suing who. &#160;Never mind.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:10:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: The Kellys may not end up profiting from this.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#24</link>
<description>However, it doesn't mean the lawsuit might not bear fruit.  DHS, and the city, are being sued for gross neglect and malfeasance in failing to protect Danieal.  The parents will likely be dismissed as beneficiaries or trustees of any money award due to the </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:03:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Doomed?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#23</link>
<description>Your point about not being able to sue police and fireman is a good one. &#160;But I wonder how doomed this case would be. &#160;To use the analogy, it would be like the fireman standing next to a burning building smoking a cigarette...then flicking the co</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:45:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#22</link>
<description>&lt;i>A lawsuit has been filed suing the city of Philadelphia and DHS for not doing their job. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Andrea and Daniel Kelly.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's a mildly interesting argument, but one doomed to failure. There's plenty of case law which </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:03:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>You realize this is incompatible with your dream of maintaining the worlds racial balance?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Does Skeptic have a dream of maintaining racial balance?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:03:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#20</link>
<description>My idea is not BASED on one horrible case, I merely used that one horrible case as the conversational opening to allow me raise the idea of regulating the process of human reproduction (in a comment which, I will point out, one moderator actually found to </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:30:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#19</link>
<description>There is nothing illogical about the idea that if the government has failed, we need to have better government. &#160;We don't necessarily have to give up on the whole concept of government and embrace anarchism. Similarly, if a farm has failed, we might n</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:27:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#18</link>
<description>Well of course, if I were actually designing a system of reproductive licensing I would do exactly as you say, and take every precaution to avoid catastrophic failure and to do as little damage as possible. &#160;I am, however, not actually designing a sys</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:23:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#17</link>
<description>I am delighted to discover that there is at least one absurd question that you wouldn't ask me.&lt;p>&#10;And certainly, there could be a change in the ethnic make-up of the world as a by-product of selecting for higher IQ. &#160;I don't object to that, as long a</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:19:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#16</link>
<description>"You might, of course, ask how I could guarantee that the system would not be abused"&lt;p>&#10;Actually I wouldn't ask such an absurd question.&lt;p>&#10;"that better educated, successful, and more intelligent people would be considered to be potentially better parents</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:54:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#15</link>
<description>Especially since skeptic is proposing such a radical social change based on one horrible case of personal and institutional neglect, neglecting the vast majority of children who don't get abused and neglected by their parents, much less starved to death.&lt;b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:40:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#14</link>
<description>It is sort of baffling that a government failure could lead someone to conclude that the answer is more government, isn't it?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:25:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>arromdee: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#13</link>
<description>&lt;i>This is a potential problem, however, we can only do our best to make governments that work, and which serve the public need rather than serving only their own corrupt officials. &#160;&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It's not enough to dismiss the possibilities of abuse by say</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:51:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Como se dice: &quot;it sucked to be you&quot;?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Empathy and Morality...are learned behaviors&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/greatergood/archive/2005fallwinter/FallWinter0506_deWaal.pdf">Nope.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>We are not animals&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:59:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WMK: Como se dice: &quot;it sucks to be you&quot;?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#11</link>
<description>&lt;quote&gt;It was a little sickening, but whadda ya gonna do? People are animals.&lt;&lt;em>quote&amp;gt&lt;p>&#10;Howzabout rip the moral equivalent of a loud fart in a crowded elevator - by way of your comment on this thread? &#160;&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http:/</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:37:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#10</link>
<description>If such a system of reproductive licensing were to actually be created, then there would have to be a serious, scientific study to determine the appropriate qualifications, but even without the benefit of such a study, I would expect that there would be sc</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:21:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#9</link>
<description>Not believing in UFOs or Bigfoot for starters.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:54:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>What would the qualifications be?&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Homosexualist sympathies, nanny state loyalties and wittily emblazoned baby t's.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:54:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#7</link>
<description>I never said you were offtopic. &#160;In fact, I have to say you were wonderfully on topic.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:53:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#6</link>
<description>Offtopic, Lou?! I quoted the damn writeup!</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:37:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#5</link>
<description>" they would have to satisfy the Child Licensing Board that they are qualified"&lt;p>&#10;What would the qualifications be?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:28:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: It was merely a rhetorical flourish.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#4</link>
<description>It was a little sickening, but whadda ya gonna do? People are animals.&lt;p>&#10;(As far as my insouciance, better that than obnoxiousness like ms_sue says.)</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:34:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#3</link>
<description>I agree with you that this particular family probably shouldn't have been allowed to have children. &#160;Everybody is presumed to be capable of being acceptable parents until such time as they prove otherwise by inflicting great harm, or death, on their c</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:52:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: It was merely a rhetorical flourish.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#2</link>
<description>It probably would work better if I had finished with "it should distress (or infuriate) everyone who reads about her."  But, with your practiced insouciance, I have the feeling you wouldn't be distressed no matter where Danieal spent her last days on earth</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:12:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: This One Really Pisses Me Off (Part II)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/13/151647/993#1</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>She died as a city agency, which is charged with protecting people like Danieal, looked the other way and falsified records that she was receiving sufficient family care. Danieal Kelly didn't have to die, but she did, and &lt;b>it should worry </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:54:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>