<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Dean's 2008 Scream - GOP Is The `White Party' (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915</link>
<description>If you thought the race card had been retired from the deck of 2008 political playing cards after &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-balance_05edi.ART.State.Edition1.4d54aab.html">that blow up&lt;/a> over Senator John McCain's (R - AZ) reaction to Senator Barack Obama's (D - IL) reaction to McCain's celebrity internet ad, think again.  This time former Vermont governor, presidential candidate and &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/wa</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:22:18 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:13:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Lou: Lingering over your divisions</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#28</link>
<description>&lt;i>If Jews are white why did a Jew invent the term WASP&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;This is what I love about the right. &#160;Someone desperately tries to find someone on the opposite side who is more racist they he is, hoping to expunge his racism with the cure-all "well, I </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:13:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: qvack</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#27</link>
<description>You'll have to do better than that.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:17:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: qvack</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#26</link>
<description>Writes about &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=BBzbA3HwmbkC&amp;pg=PA18&amp;lpg=PA18&amp;dq=%22andrew+hacker%22+jewry&amp;source=web&amp;ots=ev3UsS2piY&amp;sig=pLYq5gzfhB5RXnxJoBd3xQLFzVQ&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;res</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:15:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#25</link>
<description>Got some proof? &#160;Or is coming from Queens proof enough?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:22:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#24</link>
<description>Sure. He's a sociologist from Queens.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:14:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: I'm a pickin' and he's a choosin'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#23</link>
<description>Lot's of jokes contain racial slurs. Just because a coon joke is funny doesn't mean the word "coon" itself isn't a racial slur. &lt;p>&#10;"Despite its etymology," that most whites aren't aware of, "the term shiksa is widely used and accepted," among Jews. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#22</link>
<description>Andrew Hacker is Jewish?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:56:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: It's all good</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#21</link>
<description>All muds look the same to you anyway.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:53:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: I'm a pickin' and he's a choosin'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#20</link>
<description>From the same damn &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiksa">wiki entry&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>as a mock-pejorative term for a non-Jewish woman. Traditionally, the word shiksa is used to refer to a non-Jewish woman.&lt;p>&#10;The word shiksa is derived from</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:52:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Oy...who knew?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#19</link>
<description>No, he was a Chinaman.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:50:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Oy...who knew?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#18</link>
<description>Jesus was black?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:41:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#17</link>
<description>"Mock-pejorative"? &#160;As Wikiacrapia notes, the word "is derived from the Hebrew term sheketz, which means "abomination," "impure," or "object of loathing". So it's a slur. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:03:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#16</link>
<description>Shiska, a term&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>that is used as a mock-pejorative term for a &lt;b>non-Jewish&lt;/b> woman.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Did you forget that &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xi4O1yi6b0">Elaine&lt;/a> from Seinfeld has "shiksappeal".&lt;p>&#10;Besides, not all &lt;a rel</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:56:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#15</link>
<description>If Jews are white why did a Jew invent the term WASP?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:54:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#14</link>
<description>Why would white people invent the term "shiksa" for blondes?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:40:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#13</link>
<description>No. I &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/jewish-people-white-366759.html">checked&lt;/a>. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:43:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#12</link>
<description>ummm...aren't most Jews white? &#160;Just asking.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:37:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#11</link>
<description>It couldn't be that wealthy Jews and blacks vote against their own financial interests because they dislike white people, could it?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:16:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>laputanmachine: Re: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#10</link>
<description>Whenever I read about Jewish and black culture, left-wing sentiments often appear. For most Jews and blacks, I think the Republican party is seen as anti-Jewish and anti-black by simply being right-wing in philosophy. If a political party opposes nearly al</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:47:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Oh No!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#9</link>
<description>Dean mentioned the elephant in the room! &#160;You aren't supposed to do that!</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:39:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Kasimir Malevich</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#8</link>
<description>Vietnamese-Americans are pretty solidly Republicans.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:13:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Kasimir Malevich</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#7</link>
<description>They appear to be about evenly split.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:28:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Kasimir Malevich</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#6</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>As far as I can tell, among non-whites the only groups that prefer Republicans to Democrats are Cubans and Filipinos&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>What about Italians?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:15:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Kasimir Malevich</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#5</link>
<description>Yes, the GOP is the white party. Just look at the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_1992#Voter_demographics">voter demographics of the 1992 and 1996 presidential elections&lt;/a>, and notice Clinton did not captu</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:09:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Lingering geographical divisions...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#4</link>
<description>The problem here, I think, is that the situations are quite different in the North &amp; West as opposed to the Old South, and even then between rural and urban areas. &#160;Outside of the rural areas of the Old South, party divisions have much more to do </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:04:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Showing Respect</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#3</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; See, the thing is the GOP has spent a lot of time, money, and ink trying to convince anyone who will listen that this is no longer the case. The MSM would be being discourteous to the one thing they do believe in- namely, money, the more the </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:07:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: GOP Is The `White Party' if you got land, man.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#2</link>
<description>At the time the US was founded, only land-owners could be considered to be economically successful or respectable; today one could be perfectly successful without owning land, although one should at least own a condominium. &#160;But the basis of the Repub</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:21:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: GOP Is The `White Party' if you got land, man.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/16/11337/4915#1</link>
<description>I thought that was the G.O.P. platform: protecting the planet's white people (barring commies, queers and women who didn't know their place).&lt;p>&#10;Did I miss something?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:59:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>