<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Are mobile and cordless phones the secondhand smoke of the 21st century? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727</link>
<description>&lt;/p>&lt;p>I have just purchased a cordless phone to replace an old beater of a cord phone that I held onto for years. Suddenly I find myself questioning the effect of whatever is radiating from these wireless devices. (I am getting a little more safety conscious lately because my partner and I are expecting our first child in September.) &lt;br>
&lt;/p>&lt;p></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:33:51 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:57:31 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#10</link>
<description>It's true, I don't use a blackberry.&lt;p>&#10;If these things emit microwave radiation even when they are not in use, then it's true as you say that there is a risk to storing them in your pocket, in addition to the risk of holding them to your ear.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:57:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>The main reason why people do not worry about keeping devices in their pockets, located near their genitals, is that the devices are not in use when they are being stored in pockets, and therefore are not emitting any radiation&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Clearly you aren't</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:58:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#8</link>
<description>It may be that living under power lines is as great a risk (or, who knows, even greater) than that posed by cell phones.&lt;p>&#10;The main reason why people do not worry about keeping devices in their pockets, located near their genitals, is that the devices are</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:27:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes, there are lots of microwave emitters that people have around their homes or offices, but there is still only one kind of microwave emitter that people normally use while holding it to their ear, an inch away from their brain. &#160;That makes a</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 05:52:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#6</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...there is still only one kind of microwave emitter that people normally use while &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sidetalkin.com/page-1.html">holding it to their ear&lt;/a>, an inch away from their brain&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 13:30:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#5</link>
<description>Yes, there are lots of microwave emitters that people have around their homes or offices, but there is still only one kind of microwave emitter that people normally use while holding it to their ear, an inch away from their brain. &#160;That makes a differ</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:56:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: mobile or cordless phones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#4</link>
<description>I tend to agree with skeptic. &#160;Unfortunately, by the time we know how bad things are for us, we've usually been exposed to them for years. &#160;By the time we have the information, it's too late.&lt;p>&#10;When it comes to my children's safety, sometimes I'</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:42:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Here's another few to consider...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#3</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11">WLAN connections&lt;/a>. &#160;Same thing, and I use it all day, every day to connect to my wireless router. &#160;Wireless &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.step2.com/product.cfm?product_id=1</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:10:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: bad science serving social agendas</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#2</link>
<description>Dvandom nailed it in the sub queue: the poll results reflect my thinking exactly.&lt;p>&#10;As a result of the second-hand smoke fiasco, I no longer take much of anything that comes from "official", government, or quasi-governmental sources regarding health and s</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:59:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: mobile or cordless phones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/28/115826/727#1</link>
<description>I don't think that this technology can be very dangerous in the short term, because if it was, that would have become obvious by now. &#160;It may be dangerous in the long term, and that is much harder to tell, simply because it is new technology which has</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:23:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>