<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The Palin Shocker: McCain's New VP Choice [Breaking] (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618</link>
<description>In a last minute decision, John McCain switched from his &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/28/the-republican-ticket/">first announced choice for the VP slot&lt;/a> to announce &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/08/mccain-palin-vp.html">Alaska Governor Sarah Palin got the nod&lt;/a>.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:03:01 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:51:44 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#227</link>
<description>Obama transcends voting.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:51:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#226</link>
<description>&lt;i> He's only in touch with the left wing nuttys who pushed him through the media as the clear choice, from the MOMENT he was elected to congress. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And here I was under the assumption that Hillary was the one running as the inevitable. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:13:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Nicknames</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#225</link>
<description>Best nickname for our next Vice President:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Caribou Barbie&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Courtesy of Wonkette</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:49:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>TopMarineGrunt: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#224</link>
<description>Barack is in touch, most connected to the American people? Wait, wha?&lt;p>&#10;He's only in touch with the left wing nuttys who pushed him through the media as the clear choice, from the MOMENT he was elected to congress. &#160;Since that time he has done nothin</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:54:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: looking like</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#223</link>
<description>No, it's the fat belly and the starched jeans that give them away.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:01:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#222</link>
<description>Man, I only got 23 out of 48. I suck. Those 'stans are particularly difficult, though.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:33:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#221</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The scandal with her brother in law was not 'thought up' by the daily Kos, and was, in fact, reported in mainstream media&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>That's funny, I don't think I ever claimed that. (Perhaps you only imagined I wrote that.)</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:29:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know squat, but women aren't buying it!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#220</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>She has a history of firing people when they don't agree with her, and the brother in law isn't the first to end up on her hit list&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Really? Who was first?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>So far every one of my 'bullshit' links has been bac</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:27:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#219</link>
<description>The scandal with her brother in law was not 'thought up' by the daily Kos, and was, in fact, reported in mainstream media.&lt;p>&#10;Just wait, there will be more. &#160;She's going to make Hillary look like a saint.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:23:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know squat, but women aren't buying it!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#218</link>
<description>&lt;i>I doubt I'd vote for her, let alone buy anything. See, I'm not a partisan political ideologue like you are so I can more easily assess when someone is peddling bullshit.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Ah, those pesky liberals. &#160;If you read up on what Alaskans really think</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:20:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#217</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...you were wrong while I was right&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I have to admit that &lt;i>is&lt;/i> possible, but it doesn't seem likely.&lt;p>&#10;What was I wrong about?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:19:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Rough and Tough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#216</link>
<description>This is precisely what we need in the Whitehouse...a veep that won't let a silly thing like the rule of law get in the way of getting the job done. &#160;Ooorah</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:04:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: not a panic pick</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#215</link>
<description>&lt;i>the New York Times is saying something rather different -- I find the NYT to be more plausible in this case. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Meh. It just looks to me like more yellow journalism from the &lt;i>NYT&lt;/i> -- obfuscation and selective emphasis to raise "concern." Selec</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:46:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#214</link>
<description>Nope, they're full of crap on that one.&lt;p>&#10;Just like this site, they're only as reliable as the people who post there, and ,&lt;i>you were wrong&lt;/i> while I was right. &#160;;)&lt;p>&#10;But the other link is based on fact, and backed up in mainstream media, &lt;i>just</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:28:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Those wacky Alaskans</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#213</link>
<description>Maybe they're thinking that protecting of a cop who would taser his own 10-year-old son is a worse offense than lying about attempts to get the cop fired.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:02:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Those wacky Alaskans</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#212</link>
<description>She does in fact, have a high approval rating...yet at the same time 87% think she was lying about her troopergate situation. &#160;Do Alaskans like liars? &#160;Or perhaps they're thinking, well yeah, she lied, but she wanted to destroy a former in-law an</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:35:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#211</link>
<description>Hey, did you hear that Daily Kos had a piece claiming that Palin faked a pregnancy? &lt;p>&#10;It must be true!</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:12:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Shotgun Nuptials</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#210</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://stanglpottery.org/kaygun.jpg">Palin&lt;/a> has a lifetime membership in the NRA.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:10:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: looking like</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#209</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...looked like Republicans&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Someone should clue them in that they need to conceal the pitchfork and horns.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:01:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#208</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Palin &#160;is dirty and vindictive. &#160;She makes a habit of firing people who don't agree with her&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Again, you have cited various liberal blogs - the reputable news sources you linked to do not unambiguously support your a</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:00:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding Bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#207</link>
<description>&lt;i>11.Q: &#160;Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?&lt;p>&#10;A:Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&lt;/i>&lt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:03:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: not a panic pick</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#206</link>
<description>the New York Times is saying something rather &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/politics/02vetting.html?pagewanted=1&amp;hp">different&lt;/a> -- I find the NYT to be more plausible in this case. &lt;p>&#10;This nomination is looking more a</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 04:41:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Crosspostin' this (not mine)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#205</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;miss alaska, so they said&lt;br>&#10;smell of dead fish went to head&lt;br>&#10;former mayor of frozen hamlet&lt;br>&#10;god tells her mccain might can it&lt;br>&#10;so she stands for female race&lt;br>&#10;laughs at women's rights disgrace&lt;br>&#10;disbelieves private penumbra&lt;br>&#10;views</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 04:13:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Outstanding Bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#204</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>11.Q: &#160;Are you offended by the phrase &#8220;Under God&#8221; in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?&lt;p>&#10;A:Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I&#8217;ll fight in defense of our</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:07:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#203</link>
<description>Obama has already been quoted saying family are off-limits and if he finds any of his staff are responsible for the rumors they'll be fired. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Unlike McCain&lt;/i> he isn't on the record with &lt;i> nasty jokes&lt;/i> about other politician's family, as </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:45:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#202</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>It produces a metric buttload of oil, which is important for the future.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;br>&#10;At its best It only produced about 2M barrels/day, and &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/mcrfpak1m.htm">now under 2/3M barrel</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:42:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: 4 out of 5 Alaskans approve!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#201</link>
<description>Palin has an &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122031229774188795.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">approval rating of 80%&lt;/a>. Maybe those reported were just the bitter 20% of losers.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:33:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: It's big lies all the way down</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#200</link>
<description>&lt;i>He made his career prosecuting Wall Street crooks&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And you don't think that Wall Street types frequent escort services?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:29:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: She's a magic mountain, she's a leather glove</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#199</link>
<description>If it turns out that Bristol Palin was taught nuts and bolts sex education in school despite her mother's preferences, will that prove something? Or does it only work one way?&lt;p>&#10;"that's why America has the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the developed w</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:16:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: It's big lies all the way down</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#198</link>
<description>&lt;i>[Eliot Spitzer] made his career prosecuting men and women for exchanging money for sex.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Bullshit. &#160;He prosecuted one prostitution ring that had underworld ties. &#160;He made his career prosecuting Wall Street crooks, and their buddies in th</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:08:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#197</link>
<description>All I can say is the ones I saw on MSNBC looked like Republicans. &#160;Other people have said that they were only found where there were TV cameras.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:53:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#196</link>
<description>Oh no, this will just fan the theories of conspiracy and cover-up. &#160;I've already seen theories popping up that this pregnancy is a fake, and that we should expect a (fake) miscarriage soon, as that will put any further inquiries into the matter beyond</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:20:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Surprise is the spice of life...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#195</link>
<description>&lt;i>But I understand no one has told him about these plans yet.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I also bet they haven't told him that he has joined the Marines, either.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:18:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#194</link>
<description>Apparently the daughter will "do the right thing" by having the child and marrying the dad.&lt;p>&#10;But I understand no one has told him about these plans yet.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:56:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#193</link>
<description>Oh yes, Sue, that's some of the stuff I was talking about that zyxwvutsr claims are lies thought up by the Daily Kos ;) &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:37:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#192</link>
<description>&lt;i>Are you claiming that Palin is "dirty"? Other than lying bloggers, upon what do you base that accusation?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gWi6yTVfPyJeiTBsQ33SSUiobt8wD92I9NIO0">Palin&lt;/a> &#160;is &lt;a rel="nofollow" href=</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:29:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Outstanding Bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#191</link>
<description>Thank you, Logan...just...thank you.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:26:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Outstanding Bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#190</link>
<description>&lt;i>Not only does she have a reputation for taking a stand against government waste and Republican corruption (Ted Stevens must have soiled his shorts this morning)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I seriously doubt that. My guess is that he did a happy dance: Ted Stevens endorsed S</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:17:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#189</link>
<description>&lt;i>They unite. And if takes a million Big Lies, so be it.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That is true. &#160;I agree 100%&lt;p>&#10;If they pull a win out of this, it will be because they always stand together, which is something the Democrats never seem to be able to manage. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:00:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#188</link>
<description>Heh...Gerry, you just made her point. &#160;But maybe you know something I don't but is Kos now an official part of the democratic party?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:55:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#187</link>
<description>&lt;i> But let some idiot blogger make a nasty comment about some Republican VP nominee or her family, and boy oh boy, it's all on Obama's head.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;As always, it's not just the offense, it's the hypocrisy. Larry Craig wasn't hounded because he had gay sex</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:26:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Sorry...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#186</link>
<description>if &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/510249.html">this&lt;/a> has been posted already.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:22:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#185</link>
<description>&lt;i>The real difference is, there is always some excuse for the Republican party, but the Democrats, who are more liberal, are somehow held to a higher standard of behavior when it ought to be the other way around considering the Republicans are the family </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:22:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#184</link>
<description>Who said anything about the democratic platform? &#160;I just said it brings abstinence education into question.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:52:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#183</link>
<description>That has nothing to do with Obama, and everything to do with just how nasty people in general can be.&lt;p>&#10;I am still concerning myself with the conduct of the candidates themselves, and so far, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:43:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#182</link>
<description>&lt;i>I doubt if many PUMAs (from what I saw of them on TV) ever intended to vote for Hillary.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I believe they did. And some of them will hold on to that fantasy, &#160;looking forward to 2012. I'm not concerned in the least with them. In other words, t</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:04:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#181</link>
<description>Since that story was circulating in Alaska long before the Daily Kos got it, I hardly think you can say they invented it.&lt;p>&#10;I'm going to be very surprised if the McCain campaign doesn't self destruct all by itself.&lt;p>&#10;I'm sure they knew about her daughter</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:35:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#180</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>There seem to be quite a few folks who think she's flaky, vindictive and du&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>You mean the same folks who invented a story about Palin's baby? You'll forgive me, I hope, if I don't listen to anything they say.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:07:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#179</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...having a pregnant, unmarried 17 year old daughter certainly brings up the question of &#160;the effectiveness abstinence education&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Too bad for the Democrats, then, that voters seem to care only about the economy and nation</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:04:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#178</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...if this was "scooped" by the big media...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>There was no "scoop." The entire thing was a complete fabrication.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...the Drudge Report...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I'm not at all familiar with the journalistic standards</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:02:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#177</link>
<description>I don't think that picture is &lt;i>clearly&lt;/i> showing anything.&lt;p>&#10;I don't care, but I don't think your evidence is conclusive one way or the other.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:56:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#176</link>
<description>I don't think the daily Kos is the problem, because it's all over the internet in other forums.&lt;p>&#10;The problem is that anyone would involve her children. &#160;There are plenty of reasons not to like her without picking on her children or grandchildren.&lt;p></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:53:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#175</link>
<description>&lt;i>far worse than 'Obama is a secret Muslim' or the "swiftboating" of John Kerry. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Why is it worse? &#160;At worst, it indicates that Palin is extremely old-fashioned, whereas the Obama lie is meant to frighten the public, and the Kerry lies were in</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:30:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#174</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/174153/834/246/581480">Perhaps&lt;/a> I gave you the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://code99.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/1/13427/56256/556/582203">wrong&lt;/a> link. &#160;There seem to be quite a f</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:25:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: not a panic pick</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#173</link>
<description>&lt;i>Not a bad characteristic to have in the White House.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, we really really need less transparency in our government.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:18:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#172</link>
<description>I doubt if many PUMAs (from what I saw of them on TV) ever intended to vote for Hillary.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:17:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#171</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'm not clear as to your "these women." If you're referring to the PUMAs, I think she will siphon off some of them.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Apparently McCain expects to do just that with this choice, but the buzz online seems to be evenly split between people like you, </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:38:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#170</link>
<description>Well, the whole mess about the daughter/granddaughter thing seems to be put to rest...of course, having a pregnant, unmarried 17 year old daughter certainly brings up the question of &#160;the effectiveness abstinence education. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:12:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#169</link>
<description>I agree with you on principle. &#160;However, the right, starting with attack radio, took those gloves off a long time ago. &#160;You (not you personally, of course) reap what you sow. &#160;Personally, if this was "scooped" by the big media, I'd be outrag</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:03:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#168</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Why is it far, far worse? &#160;I think we'd all agree that presidential politics is a rough sport...is it far, far worse because she's a woman?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>It's far worse because it involved Palin's 17-year-old daughter and an infant in</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:51:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: DailyKos owes an apology.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#167</link>
<description>Big time.&lt;p>&#10;Plus, the fact that the 5th child has Downs only strengthens the argument that it was the Governors. Children with Downs are more prevalent in women that give birth at a more advanced age.&lt;p>&#10;DailyKos should STFU. It has lost almost all credib</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#166</link>
<description>&lt;i>far, far worse&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Why is it far, far worse? &#160;I think we'd all agree that presidential politics is a rough sport...is it far, far worse because she's a woman? &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:44:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#165</link>
<description>Apparently there's &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/01/1318541.aspx">no longer&lt;/a> any "if" about it.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 11:27:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#164</link>
<description>I'm not clear as to your "these women." If you're referring to the PUMAs, I think she will siphon off some of them.&lt;p>&#10;And in Missouri yesterday, she was greeted like a rock star by 17,000 folks who seem to think that lack of experience is suddenly a big p</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:58:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#163</link>
<description>I gain an appreciation for slander laws in the UK after reading crap like that. I'll say no more on the issue.&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:27:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: ZOMG! NEW HOTNESS RECORD! BIG DEAL!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#162</link>
<description>305.5.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:26:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#161</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I would consider anyone who was nominated for the position a bit flaky if they giggled and said on camera they had no clue what their duties were if they actually were &#160;elected to said office&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Again, I missed that on the </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:56:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#160</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>if the evidence presented is correct...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I presume you mean "if this blogger's &lt;i>interpretation&lt;/i> of the evidence is correct."&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...there is good reason to believe that Palin's latest child might actually be</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:44:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: It's a bit like the Chinese gymnast controversy.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#159</link>
<description>Right as the events were taking place we had "experts" making their assessments on how old the girls really were by analyzing the facial characteristics of the gymnasts from photographs that were taken right before the Olympics. &#160;A lot of ado over not</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:57:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#158</link>
<description>I looked at &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30076181@N02/2814199887/in/photostream/">this one that clearly shows her pregnant&lt;/a>. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:45:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#157</link>
<description>And, if it's not true, the damage manages to center mostly on DailyKos with questions about why he decided to go this deep into the sewer this early in the campaign? &#160;Nobody, that I'm aware of, connected to Obama, Biden or the Democratic Party has tou</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:16:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#156</link>
<description>I don't care much either, but if this is incorrect Daily Kos will have lost whatever shred of credibility it had remaining.&lt;p>&#10;I hope they were awful certain of this before posting it.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:09:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: not a panic pick</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#155</link>
<description>If that is true it speaks very well of the McCain camps ability to keep things on the QT and avoid leaks. Not a bad characteristic to have in the White House. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:05:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: see above, re: push</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#154</link>
<description>And if it's not true, ex-Clinton voters will have confirmed for them how certain segments of Obama's primary constituency will take any steps, and proffer any slander they can think of, against a female candidate.&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, that's the ticket to ensuring par</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2008 00:48:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#153</link>
<description>I'd prefer that everyone just hold their breath and wait until this piece of business is either confirmed or collapsed by virtue of the development of some facts beyond the overheated suspicions of Markos Moulitsas. &#160;I just took a gander at Google New</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:59:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: not a panic pick</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#152</link>
<description>The &lt;i>Washington Post&lt;/i> is &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/30/AR2008083002377.html">reporting&lt;/a> that McCain had been considering Palin as a VP candidate since February, and had her vetted carefully </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:43:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#151</link>
<description>Definitely &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/125247/453/523/581211">reckless.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;I'm wondering how all these women he's trying to win over are going to react to her treatment of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.huffingto</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:45:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#150</link>
<description>Wow. &#160;As much as I don't like her, that's disgusting that anyone would involve her family that way.&lt;p>&#10;Not surprising, but just the same, ugh.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:21:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#149</link>
<description>&lt;i>I don't think either of your examples really "ran" for the VP job. LBJ picked up the job as a consolation prize after Kennedy beat him in the race to the presidency. Ford didn't really run for anything except Rep and house minority leader and was picked</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:07:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#148</link>
<description>You didn't look at the pictures, did you?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:03:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#147</link>
<description>&lt;i>Funny thing: To counter the idea that McCain had already made history, I offered up Geraldine Ferraro's name. Two of the three women had never heard of her and the third had completely forgotten until I mentioned it.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;What I wouldn't give for a 's</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:01:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#146</link>
<description>Actually, if you play several of her clips, she always has a barely suppressed giggle, as she does in that clip.&lt;p>&#10;Play &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/156190">this one&lt;/a> where the giggle isn't offensive because the subject at hand is</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:54:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#145</link>
<description>This is weird and wacky stuff, and I'm going to need better proof than people thinking she didn't look pregnant enough. &#160;What is this, Desperate Housewives?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:21:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#144</link>
<description>It was not a stupid question. &#160;The role of the vice president changes markedly from administration to administration. &#160;The duties under the constitution are paper-thin, so the actual day-to-day job is mostly going to consist of things the preside</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:19:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#143</link>
<description>I would consider anyone who was nominated for the position a bit flaky if they giggled and said on camera they had no clue what their duties were if they actually were &#160;elected to said office.&lt;p>&#10;WTF was she thinking? &#160;The dumb blonde act is not </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:07:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: vetting? pshawww....</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#142</link>
<description>&lt;i>but it wouldn't speak very highly of McCain's vetting process.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;What vetting process? The only thing McCain and his staff of weasels were interested in was trying to quell the media coverage of the Dem's convention. It had the stink of desperation</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:58:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#141</link>
<description>For me the most compelling is the picture of her at approximately the same stage of pregnancy with an &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp233/pooteeweet28/1stchild.jpg">earlier child&lt;/a> compared to the current child. Seems quite d</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:39:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#140</link>
<description>If it's true, it's a very pre-'50s move. &#160;I think Jack Nicholson (among others) was raised to think his mother was his sister. &#160;It was probably easier to pull off back when clothes weren't as close-fitting...and if you weren't in the public eye.&lt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:20:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#139</link>
<description>You're citing holding the ranks of captain and lieutenant as "executive experience" suitable to prepare one for the Presidency? &#160;That's some reach you've got there.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:10:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: different advantages</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#138</link>
<description>Administrative skills at that level are essentially ones of delegation, and both senators and governors cannot be successful without those.&lt;p>&#10;Senators bring an intimate knowledge of Congress and what needs to be done to get legislation through it to the o</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Didn't take long</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#137</link>
<description>So, any thoughts on the following:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;if the evidence presented is correct, there is good re</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:26:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#136</link>
<description>&lt;i>You are spanning centuries, when the job of president was very different. &#160;Washington, and most 19th century presidents, presided over a microscopic federal government; it didn't really start to grow until Reconstruction. &#160;These men needed few</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:10:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Federal vs State</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#135</link>
<description>&lt;i>It is also the closet state to Russia and Alaska often negotiates with Russia concerning fishing territory, etc. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Does Alaska negotiate or is this the job of the fed? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:30:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#134</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Governors act as Commander in Chief of their state's National Guard, which could be considered a form of military experience&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The governor of Alaska appoints the board of regents of the University of Alaska. Should that be con</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:25:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: As before, it's all about the swing voters</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#133</link>
<description>I do not for a minute doubt that your analysis is correct - &lt;i>for women who lean left&lt;/i>.&lt;p>&#10;Personally, it matches half of what I'm seeing here locally this weekend: women &#160;who tend left of center are pissed off. However the women I know who tend t</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:21:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#132</link>
<description>What did you mean by, "She's a bit of a flake..."? &#160;It's not obvious by reading the linked webpage.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:15:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#131</link>
<description>Every single president in your "top" list was either an officer in the military or a governor--and thus had executive experience. &#160;Play along with the capsule &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/alphabetical.html">biog</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:06:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Allow Me To Ask A Stupid Question.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#130</link>
<description>It's in a comment in the HTML source. &#160;Do a "View Page Source" (control-U with Firefox) and in the first screenful or so you should see a line, by itself, that says something like:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;!-- hotness: 264.5 --&gt;&lt;p>&#10;It's hidden so that people don't m</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:18:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Check it and see: I've got a fever of 234</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#129</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The "hotness" for this discussion is currently 234&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Awwwww, &#160;yeah.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:54:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Allow Me To Ask A Stupid Question.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#128</link>
<description>How does one find out the hotness of a TnT thread?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:22:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#127</link>
<description>&lt;i>Senators are basically career politicians who study legal theory, attend lots of hearings and assisting in the making of laws.&lt;p>&#10;By contrast, the Governorship is an EXECUTIVE position - it is administrative by nature. Governors have to make both major </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:13:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#126</link>
<description>Does anybody actually "run" for the vice-presidency? How many folks join the primary fight to get nominated to the #2 slot? &lt;p>&#10;I don't think either of your examples really "ran" for the VP job. LBJ picked up the job as a consolation prize after Kennedy be</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:11:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Small comment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#125</link>
<description>&lt;i> Senators do not have to make decisions between warring camps in their own organization, do not have to appoint people &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Perhaps not. But, they have to balance their base versus reaching out to independents and other voters. They have to keep all </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:52:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#124</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;Obama's trouble spot, at least in this area, is overcoming the racist vote. In a stunning display of bipartisanship, I've run across a truly heartbreaking number of people that won't vote for him simply because of his skin. Forget stances on issues</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:52:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#123</link>
<description>Anybody who thinks VP isn't running for president is naive at best. &#160;Remember LBJ and Jerry Ford?&lt;p>&#10;They absolutely must be ready to assume the duties of the office if necessary.&lt;p>&#10;For McCain to pick a simpering twit who jokes about not knowing what</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:06:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Palin and experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#122</link>
<description>If you look over &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin#Budget">Palin's Wikipedia entry&lt;/a>, it seems that her management style is "my way or the highway." &#160;She fired the entire Board of Agriculture and Conservation because t</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: The poll needs qualifiers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#121</link>
<description>Palin absolutely &lt;i>is&lt;/i> the right choice for McCain, because hopefully she is the final nail in his coffin. ;)&lt;p>&#10;I don't think that's what the author had in mind, though, when writing the poll.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:00:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#120</link>
<description>She's a member of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.feministsforlife.org/">this organization.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;She's a bit of a &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sarahpalinisnthillaryclinton.com/">flake, &lt;/a> and has been all over the news saying with a giggle tha</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:58:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#119</link>
<description>Thanks for the compliment, and welcome to the site! &#160;Hope you stick around.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:26:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>bannister: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#118</link>
<description>Profwhat - Good point, see my comments above. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:56:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>bannister: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#117</link>
<description>Port1080:&lt;p>&#10;I'm not a Republican - but I honestly don't believe Palin is any "less" qualified than Obama. &lt;p>&#10;The difference lies in the duties of the office. &lt;p>&#10;Senators are basically career politicians who study legal theory, attend lots of hearings an</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:37:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Too much pop culture</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#116</link>
<description>Yeah, after I submitted the article I realized it may be... misinterpreted. Oops.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:17:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Too much pop culture</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#115</link>
<description>Every time I read the headline: The Palen Shocker, I think of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shocker_(hand_gesture)">this&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:05:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Enlightened Free Riders.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#114</link>
<description>Yeah, most of the fishermen spent their winters in warm places like Mexico or Hawaii, but they still collected that sweet sweet dividend check. &#160;I never applied for it, even though I had to change my residence in order to bring my guns into the state,</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:46:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#113</link>
<description>&lt;i>theories of political inheritance.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;At least mine is a little more nuanced than "every woman in politics got there because somebody wanted to bang her."&lt;p>&#10;As for Palin, did you see the video of McCain ogling her?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:43:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Old and busted? No, New Hotness!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#112</link>
<description>The "hotness" for this discussion is currently 234. That is the first time I have seen it above 200. &lt;p>&#10;Either &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.vpilf.com/">VPILFs&lt;/a> get more press, or this place is really livening it up after the end of summer doldrum</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:42:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Curious timing</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#111</link>
<description>I have to wonder if this announcement was timed to distract the world from the Swedish Lake Monster. &lt;p>&#10;The end.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:41:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#110</link>
<description>&lt;i> And now we have Palin, who is from Alaska of all places. The only place that feels less "American" than Alaska but is still technically American is Puerto Rico. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It produces a metric buttload of oil, which is important for the future. Self relia</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:34:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Enlightened Free Riders.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#109</link>
<description>&lt;i> Around 500,000 of them are there because they (or their parents) got kicked out of the rest of the country, and there's no place left to kick them to. &#160;Believe me, the talent pool isn't deep in Alaska. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I bet a fair amount of them are resid</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:29:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Seriously.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#108</link>
<description>Just about anyone who gets anywhere in politics got there because they're either the son or daughter of someone, they made a whole bunch of money doing something else they could use as political seed money, or they had a rabbi somewhere along the line who </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:28:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#107</link>
<description>Don't tell that to Havok. &#160;He's so entertaining when he's explaining his theories of political inheritance.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:22:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#106</link>
<description>In short there aren't a lot of politicos who got their jobs solely on his or her lonesome. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:50:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#105</link>
<description>Pelosi also owes a certain amount of why she is where she is now because of her father who was mayor of Baltimore. &#160;Ask any Kennedy or Bush the benefits of growing up in the middle of a political dynasty.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:42:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#104</link>
<description>&lt;i>Hillary Clinton owes her position entirely to her husband, and Pelosi owes hers to a friend who inherited her congressional seat from her husband.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Bill married Hillary for her lady humps? &#160;I suspect it was because of her character.&lt;p>&#10;Your c</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:34:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#103</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Clinton and Pelosi are where they are because of their characters, not because some old horndog liked their lady humps&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>You're kidding, right? Hillary Clinton owes her position entirely to her husband, and Pelosi owes hers to </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:11:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>laputanmachine: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#102</link>
<description>I haven't read much about Palin, but the first thing I thought when I heard the news of McCain's pick was... ALASKA???? Wha? &lt;p>&#10;It's like this whole election is about candidates who represent very separate and bizarre American demographics. No one gives y</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:26:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#101</link>
<description>&lt;i>They do have close to 700,000 people who live in the state.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Around 500,000 of them are there because they (or their parents) got kicked out of the rest of the country, and there's no place left to kick them to. &#160;Believe me, the talent pool i</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:22:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#100</link>
<description>&lt;i>there were three white, working-class Vagina-American voters&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;and all this time I thought the POTUS's started their speeches with "My FELLOW Americans"</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:25:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#99</link>
<description>&lt;i>"Come on, Mayor, she's a nobody."&lt;/i> -- In your opinion, which of course isn't colored by the fact that she's a Republican.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>"Her only attributes that mattered to McCain were her plumbing and her hard-right politics."&lt;/i> -- I don't believe I ever</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:18:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: This tells the WHOLE story</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#98</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://web.me.com/dnksr/vpilf.com/SARAH_PALIN__Vice_President_Nominee/Entries/2008/8/30_McCains_Brain%3A_The_Truth_Behind_his_VP_Choice_Sarah_Palin.html">McCain's Brain&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:05:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: McCain the gambler</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#97</link>
<description>You may have noted the discussion in our sister forum about the different gambling styles of McCain and Obama. &#160;McCain is a go-for-broke craps player who likes winning the long shots (which means he loses a lot), and this move is totally in line with </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:48:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#96</link>
<description>&lt;i>1% may be all McCain needs&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;True enough. On the other hand, 1% of Obamacons may represent all that Obama needs.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:45:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#95</link>
<description>Come on, Mayor, she's a nobody. &#160;Her only attributes that mattered to McCain were her plumbing and her hard-right politics. &#160;So she made it to mayor of a tiny burg. &#160;How much competition was there? &#160;And the same goes for getting to gove</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:43:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#94</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>99% of those same women will not make the change to McCain on the basis of Palin's gender alone&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>What's the spread right now in, for example, Ohio? 1% may be all McCain needs.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:37:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#93</link>
<description>&lt;i>and the race was decided by women who, apparently, voted for Clinton mostly based on her gender.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Well, yeah. But those were Democratic women voting in a Democratic primary, so all other things considered equal, that's to be expected. 99% of those</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:33:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: We know absolutely squirt about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#92</link>
<description>My liking for people is dependent on a lot more than whether they have vaginas or not.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:17:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#91</link>
<description>McCain only needs a handful of votes in key states.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:17:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#90</link>
<description>Considering that Obama and Clinton were so close in their policies that they were nearly indistinguishable,no doubt there were a significant number of women who gave her their vote only because of her gender. &#160;But McCain and Obama have some very signi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:14:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>strangeluck: Vetting</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#89</link>
<description>Another thing that makes this choice really surprising to me is the fact that, as someone who's never been in the national spotlight (or even the spotlight of a moderately sized state), her past hasn't been subject to the intense scrutiny of the national p</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:43:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#88</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>me, a Vagina-American (or is that an American Vagina?...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>It depends how you wish to market yourself.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:27:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#87</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...thinking that females are so dumb that they'll be swayed to vote for him simply because he picked a VP on the basis of chromosomes&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Have a look at the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/">exi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:26:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Wrong, and wrong by a mile</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#86</link>
<description>Sorry, Sue, but your conclusion is way off. The general consensus from my relatives, co-workers, and other assorted friends and neighbors was that McCain is openly pandering; thinking that females are so dumb that they'll be swayed to vote for him simply b</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:53:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#85</link>
<description>&lt;i>However, the main point of the original comment might stand in that, no matter whom they vote for we'll end up with either this country's first black president or first female vice president.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Allow me, a Vagina-American (or is that an American Va</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:37:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#84</link>
<description>&lt;i>I come here for arguments.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;No you don't.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:22:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Daydreaming Again?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#83</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; Sure, a shift twelve points would be huge-- but I'm think Jesus Christ could return and run as a Democrat, and he still might not convince that many Republicans to vote for him. I'm laying my money on those Hillary voters remaining Democrats </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:37:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#82</link>
<description>It is remarkable what close to a quarter century will do to people's memories.  However, the main point of the original comment might stand in that, no matter whom they vote for we'll end up with either this country's first black president or first female </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:22:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#81</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>You're saying you're not as annoying in person then?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I'm a hell of a nice guy in person. I come here for arguments.&lt;p>&#10;Funny thing: To counter the idea that McCain had &lt;i>already&lt;/i> made history, I offered up Geraldine Ferra</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:16:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#80</link>
<description>There is a big difference between Alaska politics and national politics -- I don't deny it. &#160;But there is also a big difference between being a Senator, where you run an office of maybe 75 staffers, occasionally make speeches, go on Sunday shows, and </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:06:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#79</link>
<description>&lt;i>* It's sort of a beauty parlor, but they cut men's hair, too. What is the name for that sort of place? I mean, it's not a barber shop. Whatever.&lt;/i> -- The place I go to is called the Hair Cuttery.  The way I look at it is, if you're happy with the serv</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:57:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#78</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think McCain has clinched the election with this choice&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Yesterday evening I was at the local haircut place* getting a haircut. I was the only customer, but there were three white, working-class &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http:</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:32:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: We know absolutely squirt about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#77</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>All we really know is that she's a Vagina-American...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Some of us happen to like Americans with vaginas, Havok. I guess you do not (not that there's anything wrong with that).</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:56:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: How enlightened.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#76</link>
<description>Coming from TnT's official spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, I'd have thought better of you than to relegate Palin to "Vagina-American" and a nobody. &#160;Certainly, by virtue of getting elected mayor of even a place as small as Wasilla,</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:19:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#75</link>
<description>&lt;i>Palin has more executive experience than the entire Democratic ticket combined. &#160;Obama hasn't managed anything larger than the Harvard Law Review, and that was 18 years ago. &#160;Maybe she was mayor of a small city, and governor of a small-populat</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:18:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: We know absolutely squat about this woman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#74</link>
<description>All we really know is that she's a Vagina-American and a nobody. &#160;Everything else is speculation.&lt;p>&#10;She has a habit of shaking her finger, and I suspect we'll be tired of her voice before a month has gone by. &#160;That's all I got out of her appeara</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:43:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#73</link>
<description>&lt;i>But I don't think that any state regardless of size is going to elect a bimbo as governor.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Oooh...you haven't been to Alaska, I see.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:16:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#72</link>
<description>&lt;i>looks like he spends his free time wrestling alligators&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes, those melanoma scars on his face are worrisome. &#160;I'm surprised you brought them up.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:12:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Initial Reactions, Subject To Change</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#71</link>
<description>&lt;i>Will this make the campaign a lock for either side, considering Sue's prognosis?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I'm not as confident as ms_sue, mostly because I'm sure there will still need to be a lot of work done to convince Clinton supporters that they can feel comfortable </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:23:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Resolved -- Veep Debates Decide Nothing.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#70</link>
<description>I can't think back to a single Veep debate which really had an appreciable effect on the outcome of the election. &#160;Granted, Lloyd Bentsen's send up of Dan Quayle was priceless: "Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy: I knew Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy wa</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:26:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#69</link>
<description>Profwhat, I'm sorry, but I honestly laughed when reading your Sullivan link. &lt;p>&#10;As for why I'm so certain, let's just say it's female intuition. :-)</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:29:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#68</link>
<description>"Anti-gay" sure doesn't mean what it used to; twenty years ago it meant wanting to fire gays and quarantine them on an island somewhere, while today it means disapproving of gay marriage. &#160;Progress! &#160;Anyway, Biden and McCain both voted for the De</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:11:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#67</link>
<description>Just 'cuz I would love to take a long, hard look at Palin's positions... on the issues, that is not the same thing as saying that she is intellectually challenged. &lt;p>&#10;Personally I prefer to lust after highly intelligent, competent women.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:39:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Initial Reactions, Subject To Change</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#66</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; &#160;Well, one thing is for sure-- any fears of a repeat of a Cheney style administration have been pretty much put to rest :)&lt;p>&#10;&#160; &#160; Will this make the campaign a lock for either side, considering Sue's prognosis? I can't see it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:31:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#65</link>
<description>&lt;i>Wow, you are more decisive than anyone else I've heard. &#160;I agree this is a smart pick, but, "it's over?" &#160;I think we have a hell of a race on our hands with four excellent candidates. &#160;&lt;b>For the first time, I don't feel like I have to ch</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:23:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Eh, Wot?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#64</link>
<description>You're probably right. If anything this neutralizes the HRC '12 run. If McCain/Palin lose then she has a legit contention in the primary during the next cycle. In that case I assume the Dem powers that be would be hesitant to allow HRC to mount a primary c</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:18:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#63</link>
<description>43 out of 48&lt;br>&#10;I missed Qatar, Brunei, East Timor, Bahrain and the Maldives....</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:17:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Eh, Wot?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#62</link>
<description>By itself, it probably won't mean much...but if we look at it as a pebble in a pond...</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:56:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Eh, Wot?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#61</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; &lt;i>disgruntled, right of center HRC supporters . . .&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;&#160; &#160; And how a large a percentage of the electorate do you really place that figure at? Just curious, because after living through the 90s, the conservative CW would say tha</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:26:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#60</link>
<description>I have to agree with Sue. &#160;I can see the ears of disgruntled, right of center HRC supporters perking up. &#160;Oh sure, they'll probably vote for Hillary in 2012, but for now there's a fresh faced, self-avowed hockey mom (her words, not mine) who coul</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:55:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rumata: Gerry -- disingenuous?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#59</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Then you either haven't thought it through or you're being disingenuous.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;p>&#10;You must be new here.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:47:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#58</link>
<description>Wow, you are more decisive than anyone else I've heard. &#160;I agree this is a smart pick, but, "it's over?" &#160;I think we have a hell of a race on our hands with four excellent candidates. &#160;For the first time, I don't feel like I have to choose b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:19:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#57</link>
<description>Palin has more executive experience than the entire Democratic ticket combined. &#160;Obama hasn't managed anything larger than the Harvard Law Review, and that was 18 years ago. &#160;Maybe she was mayor of a small city, and governor of a small-population</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:16:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#56</link>
<description>&lt;i> For those of you who think Biden will rip her to shreds with his vast knowledge and experience, let me remind you that most people don't give a crap about that elitist stuff anymore. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Nor do people give a crap about VP debates, in general.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:49:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: It's Over</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#55</link>
<description>I think McCain has clinched the election with this choice. I think he probably would have won with a couple other choices, but this was masterful. &lt;p>&#10;For those of you who think Biden will rip her to shreds with his vast knowledge and experience, let me re</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:37:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jackkeefe: Re: Life Expectancy</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#54</link>
<description>I'll bet McCain annonuces a one term plede in his speech. &#160;It will mitigate the age issue and allow him to campaign as being free from the political bondage of running for reelection. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:35:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jackkeefe: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#53</link>
<description>Out of curiousity, have you ever seen Palin interviewed? Or do you just believe that Biden will cream her because he's been in the Senate forever and she is newcomer to the national stage?&lt;p>&#10;I've only seen Kudlow interview Palin and she was pretty frickin</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:31:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#52</link>
<description>&lt;i>Only 63%? There's your real shocker!&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And &lt;i>you&lt;/i> were giving &lt;i>me&lt;/i> a hard time for being sexist? &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:12:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#51</link>
<description>Yeah, well, I kind of just made it up. I could go as high as 94%.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:05:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#50</link>
<description>&lt;i>Only&lt;/i> 63%? There's your real shocker!</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:58:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#49</link>
<description>Ahhh, but the bigger question is that once you tripped your lever, would you still respect her policies in the morning?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:19:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#48</link>
<description>Focus groups say 63% of guys would as well. &lt;p>&#10;And for more off topic banter, here is the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q297/ufilms/Untitled-1.jpg?t=1220040849">most creative fark photoshop&lt;/a> thus far of &lt;a rel="nofollow" hr</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:15:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#47</link>
<description>&lt;i>US life expectancy has gone up five years since 1982.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;...and yet the average life expectancy for men is still 75 years. &#160;Although to be fair, as I read &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf#027">this chart&lt;/a>, s</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:11:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Goddamn -stans.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#46</link>
<description>I gave up after 7 minutes. I got 39/48 right (no cheating), which isn't too shabby I guess since I am not running for anything. Even more frustrating was that you had to spell it exactly correct, so that was a pain in the butt. &lt;p>&#10;But yeah, I'm satisfied.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:06:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#45</link>
<description>&lt;i>He's three years OLDER than Reagan was when he first took office. &#160;He will be almost as old starting his first term as Reagan was starting his second term.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;US life expectancy has gone up five years since 1982. And Reagan lives 15 years past </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Just sayin'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#44</link>
<description>I appreciate what you're saying...I just feel that "Bush the Cheerleader" puts him squarely in the bimbo column.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:51:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#43</link>
<description>&lt;i>Obama was elected to the Senate in 2004 and came into office on January 4th 2005, so he actually has almost four years of Senatorial experience&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You're right. Sorry about that.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>It's also laughable to compare Palin's experience as a Mayor of </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:50:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: Just sayin'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#42</link>
<description>Sorry &#160;but I suffer from an advanced case of paleo-sexism. To me, only women can be "bimbos". Men (like your example) who exhibit similar characteristics are "morons". &lt;p>&#10;I know a whole shitload of morons have been elected state governors, but I stil</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:45:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: I must say</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#41</link>
<description>I think McCain made a good strategic choice. &#160;She seems to have conservative chops and looks to be a popular leader in her state. &#160;She's a "Feminist for Life", which might rankle the pro-choice folks, but she still self identifies as a feminist. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:43:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Just sayin'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#40</link>
<description>&lt;i>But I don't think that any state regardless of size is going to elect a bimbo as governor.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Are you &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.darkbrownbuckets.com/media/Bush.jpg">sure&lt;/a> about &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:30:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#39</link>
<description>&lt;i>What is "silly" is your assertion that ANY Presidential or Vice-Presidential candidate of the last 40 years or so anyway could pull off that feat. Sorry if my response didn't make that clear. :)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I guess it's asking for too much, but I wish it was</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:22:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#38</link>
<description>I got 42 out of 48, not too bad I guess. &#160;I would have got three more (Singapore, Brunei, &amp; East Timor) but they're so small I couldn't see them on the map, and hence forgot about them. &#160;Totally missed Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, and Bahrain, tho</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:20:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#37</link>
<description>Great find!</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:17:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: assclownery</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#36</link>
<description>&lt;i>Four letters: P U M A&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Puckers Up McCain's Ass? &#160;&lt;p>&#10;One would think it's puckered up enough as is.....&lt;br>&#10;'Course the more one pays attention to McCain's thought processes, one would be forgiven for wondering if His Geezerdom is letting his</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:13:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#35</link>
<description>Sixth line should read "...&lt;i>only &lt;b>one&lt;/b> who&lt;/i>..."</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:13:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#34</link>
<description>&lt;i> If I gave you a blank map, could you name every country on it? &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Only one way to &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sporcle.com/games/asia.php">find out&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:10:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#33</link>
<description>What is "silly" is your assertion that ANY Presidential or Vice-Presidential candidate of the last 40 years or so anyway could pull off that feat. Sorry if my response didn't make that clear. :)&lt;p>&#10;Look I don't think Palin is qualified for either job. To b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:09:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HidingFromGoro: Re: The Palin Shocker</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#32</link>
<description>I'd hit it.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:05:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#31</link>
<description>&lt;i>Damn port, are you high? That's got to be about the silliest thing I've ever seen you post here.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You don't think knowledge of the world around us should be a qualification for president, or are you knocking me because Palin is just running as VP?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:55:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#30</link>
<description>&lt;i>I can find even most obscure former Soviet Republics and failed-state African countries on a map. I know the names of most world leaders. Does that qualify me to be president?&lt;p>&#10;My point is that any reasonably intelligent, reasonably well-educated pers</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:53:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: well this is a surprise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#29</link>
<description>I'm somewhat reminded of how I felt when Bush announced Harriet Miers as his choice for the supreme court. Yea she's a citizen of the USA and as such meets the minimum requirements for the VP slot, but I think that this decision is based 100% on voter calc</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:51:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#28</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Is it really? &#160;If I gave you a blank map, could you name every country on it? &#160;I don't think I could, although &lt;b>I would hope that a serious US presidential candidate could.&lt;/b>&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>&lt;p>&#10;Damn port, are you high? That's </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:48:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#27</link>
<description>&lt;i>Bush didn't know who the president of Pakistan was because he was (and remains) a fucking moron who is lost without his handlers.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;....and yet Bush in 2000 had FAR more proven executive and political experience than Palin, and also a much better e</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:46:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>Whatever he was trying to point out, claiming she can't find countries on a map is way over the top.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Is it really? &#160;If I gave you a blank map, could you name every country on it? &#160;I don't think I could, although I would hope that a seri</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:42:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#25</link>
<description>Bush didn't know who the president of Pakistan was because he was (and remains) a fucking moron who is lost without his handlers.&lt;p>&#10;I can find even most obscure former Soviet Republics and failed-state African countries on a map. I know the names of most </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:40:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Military Experience?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#24</link>
<description>I can buy that being a governor is the closest thing to being a President in the US of A. But how can people claim that acting as a governor, by itself, confers military experience? When the guard is deployed abroad they are acting in a federal capacity, a</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:31:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#23</link>
<description>Whatever he was &lt;i>trying&lt;/i> to point out, claiming she can't find countries on a map is way over the top.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:28:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#22</link>
<description>&lt;i>Now wait a minute. I was going to stay out of this but this is just over the top. She doesn't know basic geography because she's a "young good-looking woman"? You are just assuming she's a bimbo.&lt;p>&#10;I know as you have painstakingly pointed out Alaska ha</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:28:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#21</link>
<description>I don't really think he called her a bimbo. Yes he pointed out she is physically attractive (in another sub thread), but I don't think his comment was obnoxious on its face. &lt;p>&#10;I think he was trying to point out that Biden has a bunch of foreign policy ex</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:22:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#20</link>
<description>&lt;i>senators only have to show up and vote once in a while.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Meh, that's all they're required to do, I guess, but in practice they do a lot more than that. &#160;Every US Senator and US Rep that wants to get reelected has a huge staff dedicated to &lt;a </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:18:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#19</link>
<description>Edwards was a senator. Governors actually have responsibility, senators only have to show up and vote once in a while.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:05:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#18</link>
<description>&lt;i>John Edwards. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Good point, although Edwards at least had served in national office. &#160;He was pretty damn weak, though.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:02:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#17</link>
<description>Now wait a minute. I was going to stay out of this but this is just over the top. She doesn't know &lt;i>basic geography&lt;/i> because she's a "young good-looking woman"? You are just assuming she's a bimbo.&lt;p>&#10;I know as you have painstakingly pointed out Alask</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:02:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>Did I miss the special election held in 2005 for Illinois senator? No. Obama has held office exactly as long as Palin: 8 years in the minors (she was a mayor), 2 in the majors. Both had lower level community positions before those.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Obama was elec</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:01:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>Hillary Clinton supporters are bound to love.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And an anti-choice track record and Republican party membership that they are bound to not love. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:59:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#14</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>She has absurdly less experience than any Presidential or VP candidate in recent memory&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>John Edwards.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:58:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#13</link>
<description>The beautiful part is that she doesn't necessarily have to win. If she holds her own, she gets credit for standing up to a powerful speaker -- which might be enough, if McCain mops the floor with Obama in their three debates.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:46:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: One Thing For Sure.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>Other than cementing his relations with the rightmost side of the Republican Party, it's hard to see what this accomplishes.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Four letters: P U M A.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:44:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>Obama has three years of US Senatorial experience&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Did I miss the special election held in 200&lt;b>5&lt;/b> for Illinois senator? No. Obama has held office exactly as long as Palin: 8 years in the minors (she was a mayor), 2 in the majors. Both had low</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:42:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: One Thing For Sure.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#10</link>
<description>This sews up Alaska's three electoral votes. &#160;Oh wait, the only time the state went Democratic was 1964. &#160;Other than cementing his relations with the rightmost side of the Republican Party, it's hard to see what this accomplishes. &#160;But then,</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:28:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#9</link>
<description>Good point...I can't imagine more of a mismatch. &#160;I wonder if Palin even knows where half the countries are that Biden's been to?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:03:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>She's not running for president. She only gets to be president of McCain dies early&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;McCain is in his early 70s. &#160;He's three years OLDER than Reagan was when he first took office. &#160;He will be almost as old starting his first term as Reag</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>singularity: The VP debates.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#7</link>
<description>Biden will most likely destroy her in the VP debates.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:59:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#6</link>
<description>Well, for starters, I have always been somewhat unhappy about Obama's lack of experience - but that just makes me doubly unhappy about Palin, who makes Obama look like an elder statesman. &#160;Obama has three years of US Senatorial experience, plus multip</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#5</link>
<description>&lt;i>What, exactly, makes her qualified to be president?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;She's not running for president. She only gets to be president of McCain dies early or (more likely) runs on her own after four or eight years.&lt;p>&#10;In the meantime, I suspect what time she spends</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:47:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>Say what you will about Obama's choice of Biden, but he clearly has the chops to be president if need be.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;As opposed to Obama himself, who has Palin's level of credentials. &lt;p>&#10;If she's not qualified to be &lt;i>Vice-&lt;/i>President, what does that sa</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:37:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>As you can probably tell by my QL, I think Palin is a great choice for McCain. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;What, exactly, makes her qualified to be president? &#160;I believe you've been harping about Obama's lack of qualification. &#160;What makes you satisfied that Palin</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:34:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Outstanding</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#2</link>
<description>As you can probably tell by my QL, I think Palin is a great choice for McCain. Not only does she have a reputation for taking a stand against government waste and Republican corruption (Ted Stevens must have soiled his shorts this morning), but also has a </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:28:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Smacks of desperation or senility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/8/29/105323/618#1</link>
<description>What, exactly, are her qualifications? &#160;This makes a mockery of McCain's criticism of Obama's lack of experience. &#160;Obama has at least served on the national stage, has excellent academic credentials, and has clearly been preparing himself for the</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:26:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>