<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Religious Freedom Versus Women&#x27;s Health (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2012/2/10/17054/4159</link>
<description>Should religiously affiliated employers be required to provide &#x3C;a rel=&#x22;nofollow&#x22; href=&#x22;http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/09/politics/contraception-controversy/index.html&#x22;&#x3E;full contraceptive coverage&#x3C;/a&#x3E; to female employees in their health care plans? One proposed federal rule to that effect ignited firestorms of protest from Catholics and Republicans, and &#x3C;a rel=&#x22;nofollow&#x22; href=&#x22;http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-to-announce-adjustment-to-birth-control-rule/2012/02/10/gIQArbFy3Q_story.html &#x22;&#x3E;anothe</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:42:06 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>
</channel>
</rss>