Politics

Will Germany Be Saying Auf Wiedersehen To Afghanistan?

MayorBob.

Posted to Politics on Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 03:55:20 AM EST (promoted by Acefantastik). RSS.

The old saying goes "a picture says a thousand words."  If there's any truth to that, a German magazine just printed 5,000 damning words on the conduct of the German Army.  The pictures appearing in a recent issue of Bild magazine showed German Army soldiers in Afghanistan desecrating human remains they found on patrol.  The pictures sparked outrage at the behavior of the soldiers.  This, combined with a few other factors, are causing the German government to take a hard look at its ongoing commitment to Afghanistan.

The pictures (link to German language article in magazine with link to video report) show members of the Bundeswehr with a human skull mounted on the hood of a jeep.  There is also another with a soldier holding the skull in his right hand and his exposed penis in his left hand.  Then there's one with a soldier grinning as he holds the skull in his hand.  All five photos add up to a not very savory picture of German soldiers, certainly not one the German military wants to promote.  German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said:

"It is clear and unmistakable that this kind of behavior from German soldiers cannot be tolerated.  This behavior is diametrically opposed to the values and behavior we teach and train our soldiers in. The pictures provoke disgust and absolute incomprehension."
This is not the first such incident to emerge from Afghanistan where soldiers apparently showed disrespect for human remains.  Videos taken showing US forces burning the bodies of Taliban fighters created a stir last year.  At the time allegations were made that the bodies were burned to incite and outrage other Taliban fighters while US authorities said they burned the bodies because the corpses were beginning to stink.  Whatever the reason for the cremation, the incident caused outrage among Afghans with the government filing a complaint with the US government.  In this most recent incident, it couldn't be determined if the skull in question was that of an Afghan or possibly a Russian soldier who died during the Soviet war in Afghanistan.  However, the damage has been done by the photos which got heavy rotation in German print and electronic media.  German Chancellor Angela Merkel promised a full investigation of the incident.

The photos emerged just as the German government decided to extend participation in Operation Enduring Freedom - Afghanistan by continuing to assign soldiers to duty in Afghanistan.  However, the decision also included reducing the size of the German contingent in country from 2,800 down to 1,800 troops.  German public opinion has also been spun up by the emerging story behind the fate of Murat Kurnaz.  Kurnaz was a German-born son of Turkish "guest workers" in Germany who found himself swept up in the roundup of terror suspects in Pakistan in the wake of 911.  He was held at Guantanamo Bay until August of this year but, along the way, Kurnaz says he was subjected to harsh treatment at the hands of German soldiers in Afghanistan.  The German parliament's defense committee is scheduled to discuss Kurnaz's case this week.  These two incidents, coupled with concerns over an increase in combat tempo throughout Afghanistan have some questioning how long Germany can remain in country.

edited by Ace

Tags: War on Terror, Afghanistan, NATO, Germany, Germans, edited by Ace, written by MayorBob (all tags)

This story: 8 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
2

Flipped the negative

tomc.

Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 06:48:52 PM EST

5.00 (funny, funny)

They must have flipped the negative of that photo.  

Everyone knows your supposed to hold the skull in your LEFT hand while holding your penis in the RIGHT.

3

Thank goodness it's the Germans this time

nmiguy.

Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 11:42:02 AM EST

5.00 (astute)

After Abu Ghraib and Guantanimo and the US soldiers raping and killing an Iraqi and her family, I am relieved that this time the atrocity is the Germans.  I've had enough shame over the behavior of some US troops.  

4

Re: Will Germany Be Saying Auf Wiedersehen

dzetetes.

Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 09:36:57 PM EST

5.00 (astute, interesting, astute)

This behavior is diametrically opposed to the values and behavior we teach and train our soldiers in. The pictures provoke disgust and absolute incomprehension.

If Herr Jung can't comprehend the morbid trophy-taking of his soldiers, he's probably never served in the military...or seen a war movie, for that matter.  (N.B. comprehension does not imply approval)

I realize it's his job as a politician to be shocked and horrified by this behavior, but it's irritating that that shock and horror and incomprehension are consistently allowed to serve as a substitute for any serious discussion of the nature of this sort of behavior.

After all, a significant part of military indoctrination involves reversing the trainee's previous 17 or 18 years of taboo training against hurting and killing other people.  All of a sudden, it's not only okay to kill, it's positively good to kill some people (certain people).  The training seeks to replace conscience with discipline.  Conscience is too individual, too unstable; that intense socialization that keeps us from going after our inlaws with a dinner fork can't be allowed to reassert itself when the need to bayonet an enemy soldier arises.   From the perspective of fielding an effective military "Kill.  Kill now.  Kill him.  Because we've trained you to and we're telling you to" will never be replaced by "In the context of the conflict between our coalition of nation-states and this group of non-state entities, we hope that you will agree that in the case of the armed man in front of you who wishes to kill you, it would be prudent to make a justifiable exception to that time-honored precept, "Thou shalt not kill".  Unfortunately, although our remarkable ability to compartmentalize shows up in a way I will discuss in a moment, it doesn't easily seem to allow us to say "Although this enemy of mine is a person of worth and dignity equal to my own, I will kill him because I am ordered to do so, and because our nations (entities, etc) are at war, and our war is just, this killing is not wrong."  What it does allow us to do, however, is compartmentalize in a different way...to say, "Yes, everything I learned about killing up until now was right.  Killing people is wrong.  Therefore, the enemies I am ordered to kill...are not people."  I'm not sure to what extent this attitude informs (even unconsciously) official military training and indoctrination these days, but it's unmistakable on the ground, where it's Us (the good guys) ranged against an assortment of "hajis", "towelheads", "sand niggers", and other assorted Untermenschen.

So, on the one hand we have human nature (red in tooth and claw, to paraphrase Tennyson's description of Nature), the dissonant loosening of the killing taboo during military training, and the front-line soldier's dehumanization of the enemy, which springs from that dissonance.  On the other hand, we have a couple decades of intense socialization, the official military culture of honor and discipline, and the prospect of punishment for dishonorable acts or war crimes.  Given that precarious balance, is it surprising that amidst the stresses of an unconventional war, far from Germany, far from basic training, primitive impulses sometimes win out?  Not at all; it's actually a credit to the discipline of most modern forces that these unacceptable behaviors (from trophy-taking to rape and the murder of civilians) are the exception rather than the rule.

What I'm getting at is that this cycle of war crime/oh-my, I-don't-understand-how-this-happened, so-sorry is going to continue until we're prepared to address the fundamental trade-off we accept in order to be able to field a professional soldiery: namely, that we implicitly allow the dehumanization of the enemy, because to fully train a soldier who could effectively (without the impairment of remorse) kill enemies who he considered to be equal in dignity, and equally worthy of life as himself, would unleash a monster that would be too dangerous to bring home from war to a country filled with people no more deserving of life than the soldier's enemies in war.

In regione caecorum, rex est luscus.

1

Will The Fat Lady Be Singing German?

MayorBob.

Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 07:27:59 AM EST

none

Bild published more pictures of German bonesplay and two soldiers have been suspended pending charges while nine others are under investigation. It's believed as many as 20 German soldiers may be involved and Germany has placed itself in a heightened security state over fears that this controversy could end up in attacks on Germans and German interests.  Meanwhile, the government is considering overall reductions in its worldwide military profile talk of a search for an exit strategy in Bosnia.  Could Afghanistan be far behind?

Illegitimi non carborundum.

This story: 8 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment