Etcetera

Super-Max Prison Now Only Somewhat-Max, According To Arbitrator

pO157.

Posted to Etcetera on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 10:55:09 PM EST (promoted by 1fastdog). RSS.

The USP Florence holds the worst of the worst of the worst. However, when corrections officers felt that the security did not match the level of danger created by the inmates, they filed for (and won) an arbitrators ruling forcing the Federal Bureau of Prisons to boost security.

The facility is located in a remote part of Colorado, holding inmates in poured concrete, sound-proofed cells for 23 hours a day or more. The doors are secured steel and covered with a grate. Any exercise time is carried out in a special concrete chamber, alone. The prisoners have little human contact, and even the windows (tiny to begin with) are pointed up at the sky so the inmates cannot even identify which part of the complex their cells are located in. Perimeter security is tight, with attack dogs between the 12 foot high razor wire fences and wall, and pressure sensors and laser beams to detect any possible escape.

While structural security was high, the American Federation of Government Employees Council of Prison Locals 1302, claimed that due to funding cuts, staffing levels at the prison were cut to the bone in 2005. From an original number of 220 guards, staffing was cut to 170; meaning that 3,147 "critical" shifts were left unfilled. Within months since the cuts occured, 2 inmates were murdered in a prison which had no incidents since its founding a decade earlier.

In a major union victory, the arbitrator found entire housing units were left unstaffed (when a force of 3 officers is required), cells were not being searched at regular intervals, a drug kingpin was able to keep running his gang through the mail, and convicted terrorists did not have their correspondence monitored per policy.

State Rep. Buffie McFayden (D-Pueblo) is calling for an investigation and says that while the physical structures of the prison make escape almost impossible it is not unlikely that terrorists will be able to free their colleagues due to the lack of manpower to prevent an attack. She is calling for funding to build an exterior wall around the entire property, where currently the only protection against a vehicle crashing through is an anti-cow barrier.

The union and Rep. McFayden do not blame the warden at the supermax facility, but rather Congress and the Bureau of Prisons for letting the funding levels fall so low. They said they have requested more guards, guard towers, and walls before but have been denied. Some wonder if funding levels are so low at the most dangerous facilities like USP Florence, what does it say about other prisons that do not hold terrorists, traitors, and mass-murderers?

Tags: edited by 1fastdog, Unions, USP Florence, Prison, Jail, Security, Terrorism, Arbitration, Department of Justice, Colorado, written by pO157 (all tags)

This story: 8 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Re: Super-Max Prison Now Only Somewhat-Max, Accord

paperwings.

Sat Nov 25, 2006 at 07:24:31 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

I am having a hard time knowing what to say here.  The three prisoners listed in the write-up are, of course, notorious.  But I still don't know enough about the types of other prisoners housed there.  So far, there are a terrorist, the Unibomber, and a spy.  I guess when I think hardened criminal thug, I don't think of a spy, per se.  I was sort of picturing "the worst of the worst of the worst" to be something different.  That's not to say these guys aren't dangerous; I just wonder how unruly they get.  To be locked up 23-hours-a-day, I would expect to be more of a solution to immediate, severe behavioural problems in which the prisoners are constantly trying to kill each other, themselves, or the guards... or throwing feces and urine everywhere.  

I guess I just don't see one population of people more or less dangerous than the other.  (i.e. Federal prisoners vs. State prisoners).  I think that both populations house high levels of danger (just different kinds), yet one population gets to leave the cells and go play in the yard multiple hours a day and is willing to kill someone over the color of his bandana.  I don't rightly understand.  Escape risks are probably more of a concern in Federal prisons, so that sort of makes sense, I suppose.  

If the U.S. wants to win the war on terror, shouldn't they be willing to pay for the faculties in which to do so (i.e. prison guards and proper barrier structures)?  I mean, you can't justify the damn thing without stepping up and actually doing the simplest thing like pay guards to ensure the safety of the community, right?

4

Arkham Asylum Questions

wetkarma.

Tue Nov 28, 2006 at 09:38:54 PM EST

4.00 (astute)

As a fan of Batman comics (circa the Dark Knight Returns), I was always rather amused at the plot devices used to break prisoners (the worst of the worst) out of Arkham Asylum -- a sort of supermax prison for the insane.

It would seem every other comic series the Joker/some other baddie was escaping (only to be sent right back after the Batman --Robin being dead- caught up with them).

The thing that I'm noticing here in the "Real World" is that if each prisoner is locked up for 23 hrs out of the day in a sound proof cell, and one hr alone in the hamster wheel..er I mean exercise cage....how on earth did not one but TWO prisoners manage to get killed?

Why can't I find any good details of those murders through google? Are the inmates being released for midnight Fight Clubs a la Tango & Cash?

The best I could find about one inmate's death was that he was beaten to death by TWO other inmates. WTF? How do TWO inmates get to attack a THIRD inmate, beat him to death, with no guards stopping it in a place which allegedly keeps people in solitary all the time?

Much like the comic book plotlines, something doesn't add up.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

2

Re: Super-Max Prison Now Only Somewhat-Max, Accord

clambake.

Sat Nov 25, 2006 at 10:06:44 PM EST

none

The UNIBOMBER, being a liddite math nerd with no high technology skills, couldn't easily break his way out of the back of an unlocked police cruiser let alone an actual prison, of ANY security level.  This is just plain silly.

3

Re: Super-Max Prison Now Only Somewhat-Max, Accord

pO157.

Sun Nov 26, 2006 at 11:15:02 AM EST

none

You know, I really am surprised that they put inmates into such a dangerously understaffed facility.

The point of the place was to create an environment so secure that the worst of the worst couldn't bust out. Besides clearing a remote island off and surrounding it with mines, sharks, the Robotic Richard Simmons, and dogs with bees in their mouth and when they bark they shoot bees at you any physical structure could be escaped from.

Thats why they need guards. Given a ton of time any wall can be breached, any door can be opened. I have to agree with the prison guard union on this one. These security problems need to be resolved before something much worse happens.

Spread it on!

This story: 8 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment