SciTech

Tesla Vindicated? Wireless Energy Coming To A Laptop Near You

shane.

Posted to SciTech on Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 10:33:56 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Physicists have thought up a way to wirelessly transfer energy to your laptop, cellphone and other portable devices.  The technology would apply to short-range in home use of energy.  Assistant Professor Marin Soljacic from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and one of the researchers behind the work says:

There are so many autonomous devices such as cell phones and laptops that have emerged in the last few years.  We started thinking, 'it would be really convenient if you didn't have to recharge these things'.  And because we're physicists we asked, 'what kind of physical phenomenon can we use to do this wireless energy transfer?'."

Tags: Tesla, Computers, Laptops, Wireless, Science, Technology, written by shane, edited by Port1080 (all tags)

This story: 10 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Sweet, sweet Tesla! I can't wait!

permazorch.

Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 11:19:21 AM EST

1.00 (illiterate)

If it becomes available tomorrow, in 5 years it'll be affordable for me.
Now, on to Reich and orgone energy! This Universe ain't just for Spacemummy, anymore, pal.

----- The earth may fail, but we will quiver

2

wireless energy, crazy?

shane.

Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 01:46:40 PM EST

none

I keep thinking about this story - my first impression was that it is crazy. How could such a thing be possible.  But the more I think about it the more possible it seems: solar panels are wireless energy. windmills make use of wireless energy.  AM/FM radio transmits energy, encoded with music, and we can pick it up in our homes...  there seems to be a lots of examples of wireless energy, it's a wonder it has taken us this long, and it is still only a theory!

3

^ 2

Re: wireless energy, crazy?

rombuu.

Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 02:35:53 PM EST

none

Its not that no one has realized you can do this, its that its a lot more efficient to send energy down a wire.  That is to say, the atmosphere is a really good insulator.

4

^ 2

Re: wireless energy, crazy?

nmiguy.

Tue Nov 21, 2006 at 03:40:52 PM EST

none

The energy your body uses is wireless, unless you consider nerves as equal to wires, I guess.  

5

Remotely-Powered Aircraft

Coelacanth.

Wed Nov 22, 2006 at 08:48:00 AM EST

none

There's nothing new about transmitting power, it's just rarely efficient enough to bother.  The more interesting thing I've seen in this area are remotely powered UAVs.  Several aircraft have successfully flown powered by ground-based microwave beams or lasers.  I don't think there are any successful commercial applications yet.  May have something to do with the consequences of getting between the beam and the target...

6

^ 5

Re: Remotely-Powered Aircraft

shane.

Wed Nov 22, 2006 at 02:28:33 PM EST

none

We've had calculators that charge off of wireless power for ages.  In this case the trasnmitter is usually a light-bulb and the reciever is a solar panel.  

7

Sounds Fishy

3fingerspointback.

Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 02:05:20 AM EST

none

To overcome this problem, the team investigated a special class of "non-radiative" objects with so-called "long-lived resonances".

So I googled "long-lived resonances" came up a lot of irrelevant stuff, plus a blog roundup of people who apparently saw the same presentation as the BBC, with no other papers on the subject.  Either Soljacic is the only person in the world working on this and he chose to announce it using a presentation, or the technology is known and he is the only person in the world using this terminology, or the technology is bunk.  I don't trust it because the description, of something "emitting electromagnetic waves", is basically what all radio transmitters do, and at horrendous inefficiencies if the objective is to transmit energy.

But assume for a moment that this "resonance" deal is something different than lighting up the neon bulb with the generator across the room.  The object to be charged is going to need to be resonating at the same 6.4MHz as the charger.  What is to prevent the object from being de-charged by the charger?  Or drained if I happen to set it down next to another device that uses the same tech, with an almost-dead battery?  Or some resonance antennas that are hooked up to power resistors?  Even without radiative waste, it seems like there is much more opportunity for wasted energy with this wireless scheme.

(is 3fingerspointback)

This story: 10 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment