Business

Smile, You're On Candid Lecture

MayorBob.

Posted to Business on Fri Nov 17, 2006 at 12:41:14 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Should you have a right to conduct your daily business without having to worry about your picture being taken or, worse yet, have streaming video of you at your desk posted to the internet?  Would you get upset if something like that happened to you and the picture taker decided to add his or her editorial comments about you and what you were doing?  But, you're protected from that by the laws of slander or libel, you might say.  Well, you might be if you knew who did it but, if you're a college professor, you might not.  An internet site which allows students to rate their professors anonymously is calling for students to take candid photos of profs to be posted to the site.

Within 48 hours of ratemyprofessor.com's call for photos (and helpful reminder to students about cell phone cameras), the web site received over 1,200 photos.  The method for posting pictures to the site is quite simple: log on to the site, select a school, then a professor, and then upload your pictures from your phone or camera. According to Patrick Nagle, president of the site, "camera phones in the classroom have a new meaning."  Nagle also said the pictures would be reviewed by people at ratemyprofessor.com to exclude pornography or photoshopped items from being posted.  He also said the site would make an attempt to insure the photo taken and posted was that of the prof being rated.  "Make an attempt" is the operative phrase as there is likely no guaranteed way of insuring that all of the pictures submitted are of the professors in question.

According to Nagle, the new photo feature is actually an attempt to give profs more of a voice on the site.  It will be offering blog space to any and all profs who wish to rebut what has been posted on the site.  But, it's doubtful that too many professors will be happy to hear that their images, along with critical reviews of their performances are coming to ratemyprofessor.com.  They've been quite unhappy for sometime over the way some students filmed lectures and classes for maximum youtube.com embarrassment.  In one case, a University of Florida professor's job is in jeopardy after one of his rather unusual, rambling lectures was posted to one internet site.  And how many professors will be willing to trust a site which maintains a list of the "hottest" professors in academe?  One of those "hot profs" is Hugo Schwyzer, who gets pretty good marks on his ratemyprofessor page.  He initially was an advocate for ratemyprofessor.com, viewing it as a way to get feedback and help him improve his teaching.  But, when the site decided to allow photos from students, whether they had approval of the profs or not, he saw the aim as being to "humiliate" and it "loses whatever shreds of legitimacy it had."

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by Mayorbob, school, internet, humiliation (all tags)

This story: 4 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Perspectives from the front lines...

port1080.

Fri Nov 17, 2006 at 12:51:15 AM EST

none

Being a graduate student, I suppose it's not surprising that I'm not sure where I stand in relation to ratemyprofessors.  I think that the tenure system and the lack of emphasis that most school put on teaching (as opposed to bringing in grant money through research) has led us to a situation where there are a lot of really bad professors out there, and so I can definitely sympathize with the desire to hold profs accountable in some way (even if it's only through anonymous reviews on a website).  Having read the reviews, I would say that the wisdom of the crowds seems to work fairly well - I find that most of the comments are fair and those that aren't tend to balance each other out.


That said, I'm sure I will be horrified when I finally end up getting my own review on the site (probably inevitable, since I hope to be teaching a class or two by next year).  The credibility of the site is definitely lowered by the "hotness" rating - and the picture posting function strikes me as extremely questionable as well.  While I can sympathize with the desire to put a face to a name, it seems to me that the potential for abuse is far too ripe.

2

the thing is...

DEMachina.

Sun Nov 19, 2006 at 09:20:47 AM EST

none

I'm not sure things will be that different with this.

For one thing, I don't know  how many people really use ratemyprofessor before picking a class, for example.  I think it's more a catharsis thing if one ends up with a lousy professor (but maybe that's just me).

For my part, at least, I can't imagine taking the time to do this.  I did take some pictures of my contracts professor last summer when he put on a cape and became Promissory Estoppel Man and put them on facebook, but that's not quite the same thing (and was less so before facebook opened itself to non-academic e-mail addresses...fuckers).

Another thing: how many professors have their pictures on their school's website?  I know most of them do at mine, at least in arts & sciences and the law school, so again, how's this different?

The YouTube phenomenon is an interesting one.  I thought seriously about doing video recordings of lectures so I could replay parts later (my MacBook has a camera built-in, so this wouldn't be hard).  I haven't talked to any of my professors about it; one last summer prohibited it because he said it would make students less likely to talk/ask questions, which I can see as legitimate.

I have to wonder, though, what the issue is with that.  I mean, if someone sees a video like that of a professor they'll never meet and has a laugh, so what?  And it's not like professors aren't talked about among their students anyway, so I'm not sure it changes that part either.

Q: What do you think of western civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.

This story: 4 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment