Politics

Shuffle That Rummy Deck

MayorBob.

Posted to Politics on Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 09:42:58 AM EST (promoted by Acefantastik). RSS.

The first post-election casualty of the 2006 mid-term elections has been identified.  That would be Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld whose resignation was tendered to and accepted by President George Bush.  Bush announced that former CIA head Robert Gates will be nominated to succeed Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld was the 21st Secretary of Defense (SecDef) and served from Bush's inauguration until the results of the 2006 elections made it clear the American public was not happy about the war in Iraq.  He was the only person to serve as SecDef twice - once as the youngest, under President Gerald Ford and then as the oldest during his current term.  Calling Rumsfeld a "superb leader" President Bush allowed "that many Americans voted last night to register their displeasure with the lack of progress being made" in Iraq.  More so than any other administration figure, Rumsfeld has been a focus of much discontent, even from Republicans.  He shot out of the blocks early with good marks for the way he reacted to the attack on the Pentagon, personally helping to rescue victims.  But, almost from the moment the invasion of Afghanistan was pronounced a victory, it's been downhill for Rumsfeld.  He was blamed for not committing enough forces for the invasion.  He was blamed for shortcomings in properly equipping soldiers in the field.  He was criticized for not recognizing a civil war when we're in the middle of one.  He was also criticized for scoffing at reservations some European nations had at the Iraq enterprise, labeling them the concerns of "Old Europe."  He was, however, fertile ground for any number of near incoherent statements better known as "Rumfeldisms."

So, Rummy's out and Gates is in.  Gates was the first career CIA employee to rise to be named Director of Central Intelligence in 1991.  He withdrew a previous nomination in 1987 over controversy arising from his involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair.  Gates has been president of Texas A&M University since 2001.  Senators will likely want to revisit the Iran-Contra thing but, given the fact that intelligence failings have been blamed for part of our woes in Iraq, they might want to press him on his record and experience at providing intelligence analysis to national leadership.  According to one critic Gates was "the one most responsible for institutionalizing political corruption of intelligence analysis."

edited by Ace

Tags: edited by Ace, Rumsfeld, Iraq, election, defeat, Robert Gates, military, written by MayorBob (all tags)

This story: 27 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Terrible replacement

Acefantastik.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 10:34:31 AM EST

5.00 (funny, brilliant, informative)

I don't think that amnesiac Iran-Contra henchman Bob Gates is a great choice, considering that Chuck Norris is rested and available.

3

^ 1

Re: Terrible replacement

Coelacanth.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 11:15:22 AM EST

5.00 (brilliant)

Except that Daniel Ortega is back, too, so we need some relevant experience.

You just can't make this stuff up...

4

^ 3

Re: Terrible replacement

Acefantastik.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 11:22:38 AM EST

5.00 (funny)

even as we speak, Ayatollah Razmada and his cadre of fanatics are consolidating their power!!LOL!!

5

^ 4

Re: Terrible replacement

pO157.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 11:45:14 AM EST

5.00 (astute)

I don't care who is consolidating their power.

11

^ 1

It's a Reagan-Bush I Reunion.

MayorBob.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 08:33:53 PM EST

5.00 (brilliant, funny)

You got Danny Ortega trying his damnedest to sound like he's got the religion of entrepreneurianism and the free market.  Sorry Danny, but having Hugo Chavez as one of your cheerleaders probably didn't help dispell the notion that you've got cloven heels and horns.

Now you're gonna have Gates at the Pentagon and John Negroponte as the Top Dog in the intel community.  Maybe they could sneak ole John Poindexter back in at DARPA to work on some super secret shit that would make horns grow for real on Hugo's and Danny's foreheads.  Let's see, who else made their bones in Nicaragua?  Oh, that's right Ollie North.  Shit give him an M-60, a few belts of ammo, a K-Bar knife and Ortega will get to see Rambo up close and personal.  While we're at it, dig Bill Casey up out of the ground, start burning those tanna leaves, because he's gonna enjoy this shit.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

15

^ 11

Re: It's a Reagan-Bush I Reunion.

Shy Elf.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 08:00:35 AM EST

none

Ortega isn't entirely a coincidence.  He seems to have been elected at least in part as a deliberate attempt by the people of Nicaragua to annoy the U.S.

It is a Regan-Bush I Reunion.  The Bush I team has been put back in charge, as I said here on Oct 26th.

There are a lot of Bush I veterans who could have been chosen, and I find the choice of Gates particularly disturbing.  The Iran-Contra involvement indicates that he doesn't much care what kind of government he installs, and the intelligence slanting indicates someone nearly as divorced from reality as Rumsfeld himself.  It is Gates who will be selecting what kind of government we support in Iraq.

The abandonment of democracy as a requirement in the Baker plan, combined with the tendencies which Gates has already exhibited would appear to indicate that he would lean towards the establishment of either one or three "Saddam light" dictators to take over running Iraq.

17

^ 15

Re: It's a Reagan-Bush I Reunion.

MayorBob.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 01:01:19 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

Why wouldn't the Nicaraguans have been upset with us?  After funding all those Contras throughout the time Ortega was in charge, what did the US do once the Nicaraguans held elections and voted Ortega and the Sandanistas out of office?  We walked away and forgot the country existed.  So much for all the aid and assistance they were promised would be theirs if only they did what Uncle Sam wanted.  Frankly, I'm surprised it took them two decades to figure out a way of annoying us.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

7

^ 1

Re: Terrible replacement

thefadd.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 02:11:19 PM EST

none

Why don't they just make Dick Cheney Sec'y of D-Fence again?

escalators never fail; they just become stairs

13

^ 7

Re: Terrible replacement

Acefantastik.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 06:22:06 AM EST

none

Why don't they just make Dick Cheney Sec'y of D-Fence again?

It could have been a smart move, since President Bush could have then appointed a palatable VP who could then coast to the GOP nomination,  but I think the downside to appointing Mr. Cheney as SecDef is it would have led to embarrassing Senate hearings controlled by Democrats.  

14

No Yes Men in This Administration

Shy Elf.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 07:09:08 AM EST

5.00 (astute, informative)

Sycophants can only rise to a certain level.  Senior officials understand that the most dangerous thing in the world is a yes man, and the people I have worked for felt the candor with which I appraised them was a valuable asset.
-- Robert Gates in his 1987 CIA hearings, which he withdrew from over allegations of involvement in Iran-Contra and filtering of intelligence information for political purposes.

2

Tasteless joke

rombuu.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 11:15:05 AM EST

4.42 (brilliant, obnoxious, brilliant)

Gates has been president of Texas A&M University since 2001.

I hope he comes up with something better than operation "Bigass Bonfire"

8

^ 2

Re: Tasteless joke

jwb.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 03:26:14 PM EST

5.00 (astute, informative)

Yes, brilliant.  Bravo.

For whatever it's worth, Gates was not the University president when 12 students died in the accident you are using for your punch line.

16

I Missed A Name In That Poll.

MayorBob.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 09:54:15 AM EST

4.00 (funny)

The next one to go will be UN Ambassador John Bolton who is serving a recess appointment and still has to be confirmed.  If Dubya thought he might manage to sneak this one through the lame duck session of the Senate, he was wrong.  Rhode Island's Lincoln Chafee, who doesn't owe the White House a thing these days, said he would oppose Bolton meaning they can't even get Yosimite Sam's name out of committee.  What a shame and just when the member nations of the UN were about to name Bolton "Mr. Congeniality."

 

Illegitimi non carborundum.

6

So Long, Rummy

keta.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 12:32:55 PM EST

none

Now that one of the leading supercilious assholes has left the game, one can only hope others follow his lead (I'm looking at you, Hastert.)

This squib really captures the essence of Rumsfeld's resignation.

10

^ 6

What Do You Mean?

uncarved block.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 08:21:05 PM EST

none

   Retire from the House, or not try for a leadership position? He's already declared the latter, IIRC, and given his time at the top, I can't see him being much of a factor as just another congressman. Or did you mean to type Cheney? Speculation has already been swirling that he'll follow Rummy out the door.
   (Checks Google-- yep, it's official.)

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

12

^ 10

I'm Confused

Shy Elf.

Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 03:59:53 AM EST

none

Based on Bush's press release, Dick Cheney is clearly doing a heck of a job, too.  But, Cheney is elected.  I though the rule was that you were allowed to do a heck of a job if you were elected.

18

^ 12

Re: I'm Confused

humorlesscretin.

Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 11:59:46 AM EST

none

I though the rule was that you were allowed to do a heck of a job if you were elected.

You are.  That said, Cheney's retirement wouldn't exactly be a hard sell, and it would free up the VP spot for a 2008 Presidential candidate.  Now, do the Repubs have anyone they want to give that spot to and can they get the whole thing through before the end of the year?

I doubt it'll happen, but it's an interesting idea.

Humorless. Cretinous. What'd you expect?

19

^ 18

His name is Jeb ...

MayorBob.

Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 04:02:41 PM EST

none

... and he hails from the Sunshine State and he doesn't have anything to do for the next two years.  Of course, a snowball in a blast furnace stands a better chance of surviving than Jeb stands of surviving Senate hearings.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

20

^ 19

Re: His name is Jeb ...

tomc.

Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 08:01:09 PM EST

none

Stranger things have happened...

21

^ 19

Re: His name is Jeb ...

humorlesscretin.

Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 04:30:58 AM EST

none

Somehow Jeb slipped right out of my mind.  Now if I can just make my memory of the last 6 years do he same....

Humorless. Cretinous. What'd you expect?

23

^ 21

Re: His name is Jeb ...

Acefantastik.

Mon Nov 13, 2006 at 05:14:45 AM EST

none

Jeb isn't a VP type.  He'll be the GOP nominee as soon as the military/CIA/Girl Scouts can produce either Osama bin Laden or Ayman al-Zawahiri.  Then Jeb is the top man, with McCain as VP.

9

Re: Shuffle That Rummy Deck

CaptainLiberal.

Thu Nov 09, 2006 at 03:40:52 PM EST

none

Somewhere, in my collection of comics and comics memorabilia, I have a complete set of Iran-Contra Trading cards.  Great art, and even better nasty details of all the major players in the scandal.  Maybe one of them is going to go up in value.

22

Bush and Kerry and both history.

kcwookie.

Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 10:16:21 AM EST

none

I think the interesting thing that has come out of the 2004 election is that both candidates are now political toast.  Neither could govern and both are rejected by their party.  Maybe the days of fluff are over and we can now get down to serious governing.  The flip floping, my way or the highway, for us or against us days are gone.  We now need to have some serious debate on the future of this country and everyone needs to participate.  If the Democrats will facilitate that debate and ensure that everyone is treated fairly then they will win in 2008.  We need to be Americans for a change and that's what I think we voted for.

This story: 27 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment