Legal

That's No Tip, That's A Service Charge. No, That's A Rip Off And This Is A Lawsuit.

MayorBob.

Posted to Legal on Wed Dec 27, 2006 at 03:29:56 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

When you're a part of the service industry where tipping is part of the deal, those tips make up for what is typically a reduced minimum wage.  So it has been for the skycaps working American Airlines flights out of Boston's Logan Airport.  Their (US)$2.63 per hour wage was nicely increased by the $1 to $2 a bag tip that flyers used to tip them.  But, things change in life and so it is with skycap fees and American Airlines at Logan.  The airline began charging passengers a fee for baggage checked with the skycaps.  Only thing is, according to the skycaps, they didn't make it clear to the passengers that the fee was going to the airline and not to the skycaps and the passengers stopped tipping the skycaps.  The skycaps say this is unfair and they're tired of complaining to the airline about it, so they've filed a class-action lawsuit against the airline for their economic loss.

Actually, the lawsuit (pdf doc) is filed against American and G2 Secure Staff.  The airline contracts with G2 to provide the skycaps at Logan.  In the aftermath of September 11th, 2001 airlines went into crisis mode, with many of them in and out of bankruptcy since.  American aggressively began a campaign designed to cut costs or increase revenues.  Things such as removal of pillows and blankets and charging for meals became realities for the flying public.  One stratagem American came upon was to institute a $2 per bag fee paid to the skycap at the terminal when bags were checked aboard.  The fee went directly to American's corporate coffers and not into the skycaps' pockets.  According to the complaint, this was never made clear to the passengers who thought they were still tipping the skycaps.  In spite of the fact that the skycaps' hourly salary was increased to $5 per hour (closer to Massachusett's minimum wage of $6.75 per hour), the fact was that passengers were no longer tipping for the privilege of the bag check, ergo the skycaps weren't being paid the minimum wage.

Reports in the media show that, even though skycaps were paid less than the minimum wage under the old system, the tips made for a nice annual wage in most cases.  According to Shannon Liss-Riordan, the skycaps' attorney, what American is doing is taking advantage of some very hard workers to help buttress its bottom line:

"American Airlines is turning to some of its lowest-paid workers to help defray the costs of its business. The skycaps are hard workers; they hustle and they work hard for their tips to provide service to passengers to make it a little easier before they try to catch a flight.  And American Airlines, in trying to save some money . . . is taking the tips out of their pockets."
This isn't the way American sees it, of course.  According to Tim Smith, a spokesperson for the airline, the fee is in general use wherever American flies except for smaller airports where the airline is sharing skycap services with other lines.  Smith said: "The $2 charge is not a tip, in our estimation.  It is a service charge for those who choose to use the convenience of this service . . . and customers who use this service are still free to tip above any service fee if they want to."  The airline said it was aware that tips dropped off "for a few months" after the fees were installed but "returned to customary levels three or four weeks after the fee was implemented."  That's not the way Don DiFiore sees it.  He's one of the lead plaintiffs in the case and he says customers are "still confused" and his economic loss amounts to "a couple hundred dollars a week" as a result.  DiFiore said:
"They know we make tips and a lot of times they think they're tipping me, but they really aren't. So from my perspective I'm handing in my tip money."

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, work, airlines, tipping, class-action lawsuit (all tags)

This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Somethings Are Missing Here.

MayorBob.

Fri Dec 29, 2006 at 12:51:12 PM EST

none

A few pieces of information revolving around this issue make me think both sides are basically lying here.  For one thing, according to that CNN link, skycaps at busy airports like Logan can expect between $75K and $100K per year for their efforts.  Now, that works out between $35 and $50 per hour (which tells me they heavily relied upon tips to supplement the $5K per year their sub-minimum wage got them).  The claim here is that they have been receiving from none to a pittance of what their former tips were before American instituted the baggage fee.  Even with their hourly rate bumped up to $5 per hour, that only works out to $10K per year.  Does it seem reasonable that someone would continue working a job they used to earn close to $100K per year at for $10K?  Remember, this hasn't just been the past few weeks or months, this has been the case over a year.  So, I'm guessing that the travelling public caught on to what was up and has been tipping almost as much as they used to.

A couple of things strike me as false from American's POV.  First, if they have carefully studied the tipping habits of the air travelling public to the point that they can state that the tips resume at their usual level after about a month, then how can they place the skycaps on a sub-minimum wage basis for that month.  At the very least, I would think they owe the skycaps the difference between $5 per hour and minimum wage for the month period.  They also should be obligated to monitor and track the tipping patterns afterward to determine whether the skycaps remain on minimum wage or are moved back to the sub-minimum wage level.  But, I really have a problem with American charging a fee for essentially not providing a service.  What service is American offering here to be recompensed for?  

Illegitimi non carborundum.

2

^ 1

Re: Somethings Are Missing Here.

wetkarma.

Sat Dec 30, 2006 at 12:52:11 PM EST

none


Remember, this hasn't just been the past few weeks or months, this has been the case over a year.  So, I'm guessing that the travelling public caught on to what was up and has been tipping almost as much as they used to.

A few months ago, I had cause to travel the day after the alleged plot to blow up planes with liquids was announced. Not knowing the full scope of the subsequent ban on carryon items, I listened to the airlines who were encouraging everyone to check their luggage.

The easiest way to do this was to give my kit to the skycap at the curbside baggage check.

A skycap at National Airport (am I in the minority when I think its ironic/perverse to rename DCA after Reagan?) berated me for refusing to tip after making me wait in line for over 20mins with 2 people ahead of me.

And thus there is the crux of the problem -- travel these days -at best- is a mild nightmare filled with surrealism and illogic. The one thing passengers maintain control over when at the airport is their cash. Sucky experience = sucky service = no tip.

If the chef at a restaurant goes on a bender and burns my fish, it might be outside the wait staff's control..but I'm still not going to be leaving a tip.

Its one level of offense to make me line up so that I can be subjected to "random" (why imagine my shock at being selected yet AGAIN) searches , its an entirely new order of magnitude to expect me to tip people who earn their livelihood by delaying my journey.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

3

^ 2

Re: Somethings Are Missing Here.

ms sue.

Sat Dec 30, 2006 at 03:15:50 PM EST

none

If the chef at a restaurant goes on a bender and burns my fish, it might be outside the wait staff's control..but I'm still not going to be leaving a tip.

I don't this. Why would you punish the waitstaff? Why not tell your server the problem and decide your tip based on how he or she handles the situation?

7

^ 3

Re: Somethings Are Missing Here.

wetkarma.

Thu Jan 04, 2007 at 12:35:49 PM EST

none


I don't this. Why would you punish the waitstaff? Why not tell your server the problem and decide your tip based on how he or she handles the situation?

Hi sue,
I guess I was way too short in making my point. Some analogies don't translate completely. Obviously in a restaurant I'd complain to my server - but if the chef is sloshed its unlikely I'm going to get a better plate. The point is I'm not going to tip if I'm not going to eat the meal/have an enjoyable meal.

Serving me offal promptly is still serving me offal.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

5

^ 2

Re: Somethings Are Missing Here.

coquito.

Wed Jan 03, 2007 at 09:25:25 AM EST

none

If the chef at a restaurant goes on a bender and burns my fish, it might be outside the wait staff's control..but I'm still not going to be leaving a tip.

I agree with sue, only because I'm nearly positive that the chef never sees one cent of that tip, and saying something about the burned fish will do far more than short-changing the wait staff.

I have a related question: Here in Chicago, it's common for restaurants to have a delivery charge. It's usually between 1 and 2 dollars. Living in NY, where there was no charge, I would routinely tip 2 bucks for a delivery. But now, if the delivery charge is a dollar, I only tip a dollar. If they are charging me for delivery, I feel it doesn't make sense to pay a "full" tip, since I'm effectively paying 3 or even 4 dollars for delivery. Am I nuts?

Now with caps!

4

Re: That's No Tip, That's A Service Charge. No, T

SlyBaldGuy.

Sun Dec 31, 2006 at 06:24:53 PM EST

none

I'm sure the union has something to do with American's decision to charge $2 a bag at most major airports now. They probably made some case like, "our workers are not getting enough hours behind the check-in desk because most of the travelers are checking in through curbside check-in.  

As a frequent traveler I find that this is a huge mistake on American's part.  I don't know what their contractual obligations are, but I would play the union's game if I was managing the baggage handlers.  I would strike, forcing all of the travelers to use the check-in counter.  This will cause major complaints by their most valued customers and probably cause American to lose business.

Just more proof that the major airlines have no clue when it comes to satisfying their customers.

6

^ 4

Re: That's No Tip, That's A Service Charge. No, T

Coelacanth.

Wed Jan 03, 2007 at 11:10:44 AM EST

none

As a frequent traveler who can afford the $2/bag + tip, I love that they are now charging.  Because I have yet to wait more than 10 minutes to check a bag since it started.  

Also, every one of these counters now has a big sign saying that tips are not included in the 2 bucks.  So I guess people are just being cheap because they can.  The obvious fix is to charge $4/bag and split the take with the skycaps, but airlines being airlines, I'm sure they will spend millions screwing around with the legal system instead.

This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment