Politics

ICE makes the deportation party happen

pO157.

Posted to Politics on Sun Sep 03, 2006 at 08:43:33 PM EST. RSS.

Thirty-four illegal immigrants were rounded up by ICE outside of Buffalo, NY, and face deportation to Mexico. While this case normally would not make the newspaper, however, it has some unique aspects which drew attention.

The illegals worked at a tomato greenhouse. However, they used false identity papers to gain employment. This caused them to fall into a new Bush administration/Homeland Security initiative to criminally charge these illegals with the rarely enforced misdemeanor crime of Entry Without Inspection (EWI) a crime which carries a maximum penalty of 6 months in jail (plus civil penalties) on the first offense, and up to 2 years for the second. Those arrested who had previously been deported, but returned, were instead charged with felonies.

This is welcome news to some groups who have been advocating charging captured illegal immigrants with the laws already on the books. Up until now, they were usually deported without being processed as criminal defendants. In this case, they were charged (most plead guilty immediately -- although courtroom observers stated many were confused about what was actually happening), were given criminal records, and will be deported to Mexico within the week.

Should US Attorney's take the time to file criminal charges against those immigrants found in this country illegally? Do you think this is too severe and they should simply be returned from whence they came? Is this a waste of court resources? Perhaps they should be forced to serve out the 6 month jail sentence before being deported? What is your opinion on this important issue?

Tags: written by pO157, immigration, illegal immigration, ICE, Homeland Security, borders (all tags)

This story: 7 comments (6 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Incomplete story

3fingerspointback.

Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 12:40:07 PM EST

4.00 (astute)

OK, so the illegals are getting charged, but the greenhouse is getting off with nothing?  We are expected to believe that they're just gullible fools who happened to fall for a false-paper trick 34 times?  Or that ICE can raid any greenhouse operation of that size and come out with three dozen illegals?  I've always felt that capture and deportation of immigrants is only one half the solution to controlling illegal immigration, specifically the reactive one that treats the symptom instead of the cause.  If we don't hold employers responsible for their actions, and that includes lack of competency, then all arrests such as these do is enforce a new type of slave society in which the authorities are used to keep a stable class of laborers in line.

Regarding the incarceration, I think it's a waste of time and taxpayer money.  A fine is more appropriate, with nominal jail time for people who can't pay.

(is 3fingerspointback)

2

^ 1

Except

uncarved block.

Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 12:52:53 PM EST

none

  I think it's a waste of time and taxpayer money

   Two things oppose that reasoning. One is that prison management is big business, and the other is that no politician will ever win re-election if they oppose locking up illegals, even in the name of 'smaller government.' Just ain't gonna happen . . .
   

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

3

^ 2

Re: Except

Thalia.

Tue Sep 05, 2006 at 07:44:38 PM EST

none

Which doesn't make it any less of a waste.  I actually disagree with you about the second (that the voters want it).  I'd much rather have them deported than have to pay thousands of dollars a day to keep them in jail.  I realize that the prison guards' union is strong, but the amount of money we spend locking up people who pose no risk to us is ridiculous.  I expect if you asked the question in this way (should we deport or should we pay thousands of dollars a day to keep them locally in the jail) most people would vote for deportation hands down.

Thalia

This story: 7 comments (6 from subqueue)
Post a Comment