Business

Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

MayorBob.

Posted to Business on Thu Sep 14, 2006 at 05:51:08 PM EST. RSS.

If you're a landlord in the District of Columbia and you have a tenant who's hopelessly behind on the rent, you have to make a decision at some point on whether to evict or not.  If you decide to evict, you're probably not going to want to do the job yourself; you're likely to call in the professionals.  Said professionals are companies who hire day laborers to remove belonging from evictee's homes and trucks to transport the evictors from one property to the next.  But, while the companies contracting to do the evicting might style themselves as professional, they don't pay their hired help too handsomely.  As a matter of fact, you might say they hardly pay them at all.  At least that's what's being charged in a class action suit brought against six DC area eviction companies.

Eviction companies have a tough job.  But, most of them in DC have found a nearly inexhaustible supply of evictors - the city's homeless residents.  There is a positive feature to this workforce from the perspective of eviction companies -- they work cheap.  As reported earlier this year by Street Sense a Washington-area newspaper devoted to reporting on homeless issues, most of the time evictors don't make anywhere near federal minimum wage.  A lot of the time they are removing belongings from apartments and homes for as little as (US)$5 a day.  The fact that they are being paid so meagerly to essentially create more homeless people wasn't lost on Jake Ashford, one of the Street Sense reporters, because, well, he's homeless also:

"Here it is I am living on the street and don't have anything, and I can't bear the thought of women and children ending up in my situation. It sickens to me to know I am helping the problem that is making them homeless. And only for $5 a day."
The complaint (pdf doc), filed in federal court charges that not only do the six companies recruit from among the ranks of the homeless and pay them less than they should, they also are engaged in anti-trust actions by conspiring to keep their wages so low.  The federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour and DC bumps that up to $7.00 an hour for work done in the District.  Ashford, who is the lead plaintiff in the suit, says around 10,000 evictions are performed in DC annually.  He, and a couple of the other plaintiffs said they were paid from $5 to $15 for an entire day's work.

The companies named in the complaint deny they are hiring the homeless with company, All American Eviction, saying the workers are part of its staff or are hired for at least the minimum wage.  The economics of the business would seem to indicate otherwise.  Eviction companies charge landlords from $165 to $200 to empty an apartment and $450 for a townhouse.  Hiring ten people at $7 an hour for four hours to empty an apartment would cost the company $280, thus a money losing proposition.  But, by paying ten people $5 for an entire day's work, they can make $400 off of two apartments with total labor costs of $50.  Because DC is different from every other jurisdiction in the US, the US Marshals Service is involved in the eviction process, by serving the legal documents on those about to be evicted and being on site for every eviction.  Robert Brandt, a supervisory deputy for the Marshals Service, has no doubt that eviction companies are still recruiting the homeless:
"I would imagine that 80 percent of the evictions in the city are conducted by independent eviction companies, rather than any in-house crew. Those eviction companies are almost without exception ones that pick up crews at the homeless shelters as their primary source of labor."

Tags: homeless (all tags)

This story: 18 comments (8 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

nmiguy.

Fri Sep 15, 2006 at 12:08:10 PM EST

5.00 (brilliant)

There are a number of things I find wrong about this.  

One, paying the homeless (who need the money the most) so poorly.  Granted some of the homeless do not have the skills to be paid top dollar, but anything below minimum wage is exploitative.  They should make a good deal more than minimum since there is physical work required and therefor some physical risk.  The employers should also cover medical costs.  

Second, as if paying them slave wages for menial back breaking work, the emotional toll it takes on a homeless person making other homeless must add insult to injury.  

The guys who run these eviction companies, have they been de-sensitized to the work they do?  How can they look at themselves in the mirror?  Putting people on the streets and then exploiting homeless people to help them do the job?  There seems to be no appreciation of how hard it is just to make a living in this world.  And this is all happening in DC, where we have the center of our federal government, Reps and Senators who are filthy rich and who can ignore this travesty at their doorsteps.  

I am usually not one to make a fuss about class warfare, but this is sickening to me.  Those resposnible, these eviction companies that exploit the homeless, they should be shunned from culture and society.  

4

^ 1

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

Secondus.

Sat Sep 16, 2006 at 01:46:19 PM EST

none

It might be illegal, but exploitative, immoral - 'slave wages'?  Come on.  What else are these people going to do?  This is the perfect job for them.  They don't have to show up to work every day.  They don't have to look/smell presentable, they don't have to be fully sober, and they make more money than they would sitting in an alley sipping malt liquor.

You might argue that this lowers the overall wage rate.  Presumably because there is a homeless guy willing to do this for $5 a day, and an employer willing to break the law to do it, there is some other who's not making $7/hr doing this job.  I don't see it.  If you want a $7 an hour job in DC they are easy to come buy.  But I don't see the average homeless person being able to hold down such a job.

7

^ 4

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

nmiguy.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 10:26:57 AM EST

4.00

What do you know about the "average homeless guy"?  You talk of these people as if they fell from the sky drunk and never lived a life.

Many homeless lack certain job skills.  Many have dependence problems, and many have mental illness.  Many are pan handlers.  And I'll tell you this, a pan handling homeless guy can make a LOT more than 5 dollars a day.  

There are often day labor jobs that homeless can pick up, but don't be fooled into thinking the average homeless guy has no job skills and can't hold down a job.  Many have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.  

And the idea that the average homeless person sits in an alley sipping malt liquor is really playing into an unfair stereotype.  What else are these people going to do?  They are trying to survive.  It is exploitative and it doesn't do them much good to work hard for $5 a day.  

11

^ 7

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

Secondus.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 11:03:26 AM EST

none

I work in an urban environment, which is located near several homeless shelters.  Across the street from me is a 7-11 where many of them come to purchase malt liquor.  Believe me, this is not a stereotype - most of them drink as much as they can with the money they get panhandling/stealing.

Now, perhaps there is some other area of the city where sober homeless women with three children wander around being exploited, but I've yet to encounter it.

And I'll tell you this, a pan handling homeless guy can make a LOT more than 5 dollars a day.

Then why the hell would they work for this guy if they can make more money on a street corner during rush hour?  Your assertion is false on it's face.  They obviously can't make any more money doing other things, or I am quite sure they'd be out doing those other things.

6

^ 1

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

eduardo.

Sun Sep 17, 2006 at 07:47:33 PM EST

none

I agree with all your points except the last one - these companies occasionally do a useful job.

Not all land lords are rich fat cats. You may have a family paying a mortgage on a 2-family house with the expectation that the 2nd part is rented out to help offset the mortgage.

If a deadbeat lives there, guess what, you're not taking any money in but you're paying the huge mortgage. In this situation, sadly, it takes a professional service to remove the dead beat from the premises.

So on one hand, yes, it's a disgusting business to do daily, but on the other hand if these companies didn't exist, a lot of landlords would get hurt.

8

^ 6

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

nmiguy.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 10:29:02 AM EST

none

eduardo, I am not against eviction companies, they do a useful service as you say.  I am against exploitative eviction companies.  If your business is a sensitive and difficult one like evicting deadbeats, you should approach the job professionally and treat your employees with dignity and a fair wage for hard work.  

14

^ 8

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

eduardo.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 07:55:05 PM EST

none

Yea. That's why I agreed with your other points.

2

Re: Using The Homeless To Create The Homeless

Thalia.

Fri Sep 15, 2006 at 11:41:55 PM EST

5.00

Today's word is Minimum Wage Laws.  They're there for a reason.  Just because the person you employ is homeless doesn't mean that the minimum wage laws do not apply.  

This looks like yet another great job for an ambitious DA.  Talk to the workers doing an eviction, get affidavits, and put this guys out of business.  It's easy money, not to mention easy good publicity.

Thalia

3

^ 2

Is There A DA In DC?

MayorBob.

Sat Sep 16, 2006 at 07:50:56 AM EST

5.00 (informative)

As a federal district, DC doesn't have an elected district attorney.  The US Attorney for the District of Columbia, a political appointee of the US president and employee of the US Department of Justice, serves as the district attorney for DC.  This is not to say that US Attorney Wainstein isn't a diligent public servant and would don blinkers at the flouting of minimum wage laws but I think one needs to ask, what's in it for him?  With all the serious crimes against persons and property that occur in DC on a regular basis, you have to wonder if he's going to really assign anyone to investigate the crime of underpaying a bunch of homeless people?  That, and the people being victimized by this are not what you could call US Attorney Wainstein's bosses' "political base."

Were this any other city than Washington, you're probably correct, an eager beaver DA would try to press charges against the eviction companies.  But this is Washington, which is currently being run by a bunch of economic laissez faire corporatists.  So, there's nothing to be gained by tying up the time of a clerk, much less an assistant prosecutor.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

9

^ 3

Re: Is There A DA In DC?

nmiguy.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 10:32:26 AM EST

none

But this is Washington, which is currently being run by a bunch of economic laissez faire corporatists.  So, there's nothing to be gained by tying up the time of a clerk, much less an assistant prosecutor.

Something to be gained is enforcing the laws and helping those who need it.  Oh, yeah this is Washington DC, and the culture there on Capitol Hill on down is that you don't help anybody unless there's something "in it" for you.  

What is the point of having laws that you won't enforce?  Might as well not hav eteh laws in the first place.

5

^ 2

Minimum wage laws is three words

Steve Urkel.

Sat Sep 16, 2006 at 01:53:14 PM EST

none

"Just because the person you employ is homeless doesn't mean that the minimum wage laws do not apply."

If a company is paying minimum wage, they aren't going to hire a homeless person. By enforcing minimum wage laws and putting "this[sic] guys out of business" you're putting impoverished homeless people out of work.

10

^ 5

Re: Minimum wage laws is three words

nmiguy.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 10:34:55 AM EST

none

By enforcing minimum wage laws and putting "this[sic] guys out of business" you're putting impoverished homeless people out of work.

They could make more with a can in front of a subway station.  There are ways to help the homeless other than empowering those that would exploit them.  You probably hurt the homeless more by letting these businesses operate like this.  

12

^ 10

Re: Minimum wage laws is three words

Secondus.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 11:07:22 AM EST

none

They could make more with a can in front of a subway station.

If they could make more money panhandling at the bus station, they would.  Perhaps they do both.

13

^ 10

Re: Minimum wage laws is three words

Secondus.

Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 11:07:46 AM EST

none

They could make more with a can in front of a subway station.

If they could make more money panhandling at the bus station, they would.

This story: 18 comments (8 from subqueue)
Post a Comment