Death Penalty Facing Execution In New Jersey
pO157.
Posted to Legal on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 02:46:08 PM EST (promoted by 1fastdog). RSS.
A new report has been released by a special government commission in New Jersey fueling the debate over a punishment that has not been used since 1963. The report, coupled with the fact that the state has its first anti-death penalty governor since 1982 and a potentially sympathetic legislature could mean that NJ could soon become the 13th state without the sentence.
The report (pdf) suggests removing the death penalty and replacing it with "the alternative of life imprisonment in a maximum security institution without the possibility of parole," as it would "sufficiently ensure public safety and address other legitimate social and penological interests, including the interests of the families of murder victims." They suggest removing the death penalty from sentencing options provided to a jury for a myriad of reasons, including:
•Life in prison is cheaper.
•Life in prison removes the state from a debate over the potential disproportionate application of the ultimate penalty.
•Life in prison is a mistake that can be reversed.
•The Death Penalty may no longer be morally justifiable.
One dissenting voice on the commission, is former state Sen. John F. Russo, who was responsible for drawing up New Jersey's death penalty statute when it was reinstituted back in 1982.
He conceded the law may need to be abolished if it continues to be administered as it has since 1982, but wrote the law isnt the problem. But I believe that the fundamental problem is not the statute, but rather liberal judges and other individuals who have consistently disregarded the legislative will and refused to enforce the law as written
Of course, one group has not been polled as to their opinion on this issue, but it can be inferred that the 9 denizens of the NJ Capital Sentence Unit have strong feelings on this topic.
< Bush Flip-Flops on Warrantless Wiretaps
The Burning Crusade Claims 8 Million Lives >
