Politics

The Politics Of Race & Gender: Is The US At A Turning Point?

port1080.

Posted to Politics on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 08:37:25 AM EST (promoted by 1fastdog). RSS.

On Saturday, October 20th, US Representative (and son of two Indian-American immigrants) Robert Jindahl won the governorship of Louisiana, running on the ticket of the Republican Party.  With 53% of the vote, he won an outright victory that allows him to avoid having to compete in a Nov. 17th runoff election.

Jindahl's election marks the first time an Indian-American has been elected to the governorship of a US state, and is also the first time a non-white has won the governorship of Louisiana since the end of Reconstruction.  This victory comes at a time when an African-American and a woman are two of the leading candidates in the 2008 US Presidential race, when one of the most powerful seats in the US cabinet has been held by either a woman or an African-American for the last ten years, and when women are at record levels of representation in both the House and Senate, and the racial demographics of Congress roughly match that of the US as a whole.  Given these statistics, one might believe that US has reached a turning point in racial and gender equality, at least when it comes to elections.

On the other hand, women still make up only approximately 17% of Congress, even though they represent slightly more than 50% of the US population.  Including Jindahl, only four non-white candidates have won state governorships (in the contiguous 48 states) in the modern era.  Additionally, racial tensions appear to be on the rise again, with a spate of hangman's nooses turning up in recent months, in an apparent reaction to the "Jena Six" protests of last month.  Is Jindahl's election truly a sign that the US has reached a turning point, or is it simply a reminder that there is still a long way to go?

Tags: written by Port1080, edited by 1fastdog, politics, race, gender, Congress, elections, Robert Jindahl, governors, Louisiana (all tags)

This story: 9 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
2

No bigotry here! We elected a Catholic!

Shy Elf.

Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 05:02:45 PM EST

5.00 (interesting, astute, astute)

Back when Kennedy was elected president in 1960, everyone congratulated themselves on the death of religious bigotry.  Before that, we congratulated ourselves on the death of racism when we elected Irish and Germans to high office.

While prejudice against these groups may now seem as quaint and draw as little emotional reaction as prejudice against star-bellied sneeches, back in the day prejudice against these groups was severe.

The groups against whom prejudice is directed have always changed, and when prejudice against a group lessens we've always congratulated ourselves even as another group took the place at the bottom of the social ladder.  It's not that I believe that we aren't making real progress, so much as that the extent of it is greatly overstated by watching the status of any particular group.

Hispanics and in particular Mexicans and not Blacks are now at the bottom of the social ladder, and prejudice against them is getting worse instead of better.  Similarly things are getting worse for our enemies of the moment, Arabs and Muslims.  Polls results don't seem to look all that rosy to me either.

It seems to me that the real prejudice nowadays doesn't exactly follow racial lines anymore, and that this is responsible for people saying that they would elect someone of a different race.  It's O.K. with most people to be Black or Hispanic so long as you don't "Act Black" or speak very little English, etc.

3

^ 2

Re: No bigotry here! We elected a Catholic!

port1080.

Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 07:24:29 PM EST

none

It seems to me that the real prejudice nowadays doesn't exactly follow racial lines anymore, and that this is responsible for people saying that they would elect someone of a different race.  It's O.K. with most people to be Black or Hispanic so long as you don't "Act Black" or speak very little English, etc.


Is that really prejudice, though, or is it just saying that some behaviors aren't acceptable?  Where do you draw the line - I wouldn't vote for someone who embraces gangsta rap culture, for example, but I don't think that has anything to do with race or prejudice, per se - I would just feel uncomfortable voting for a candidate that embraced a musical genre which promotes misogyny and blatant disrespect for the law.  

4

^ 3

Amen, brother

Lou.

Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 07:54:33 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

I think electing someone with that kind of taste in music would be a catastrophe.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

5

^ 4

Freebird!

MayorBob.

Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 10:41:39 PM EST

none

Said as I flick my Bic.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

6

^ 2

Re: No bigotry here! We elected a Catholic!

pO157.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 06:32:13 AM EST

none

It seems to me that the real prejudice nowadays doesn't exactly follow racial lines anymore, and that this is responsible for people saying that they would elect someone of a different race.  It's O.K. with most people to be Black or Hispanic so long as you don't "Act Black" or speak very little English, etc.

How true. Ironically, Clinton is doing just as well with Blacks as Obama. Perhaps it goes both ways?

Just for fun, you know who else is cleaning up the black vote?

8

^ 2

Long Shot?

pO157.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:39:06 AM EST

none

Also, has anybody run the numbers for a libertarian agnostic? Because I have this exploratory committee for 2016 urging me to run, and I don't want to commit my millions in personal wealth if it is going to be a long shot.

9

^ 8

Timing is everything

Lou.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 12:35:22 PM EST

none

"libertarian agnostic"?  hmmmm, 2016 might be too soon.  Given the ease with which fundamentalists will give up power, I'd say 3016 might be closer to the mark.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

1

Come so far, so far to go...

port1080.

Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 08:49:37 AM EST

none

I wrote this mainly because I'm not sure myself how to look at the situation.  I'm relatively young (26), and yet I can remember a time when I couldn't imagine a black man or a woman being elected president.  Heck, when Hillary Clinton ran for Senate and everyone was talking about how it was setting the stage for a presidential run, I thought it would never happen.  Even now I'm shocked that Jindahl ended up winning Louisiana (on the Republican ticket, no less).  On the other hand, it's also pretty clear that there's still a lot of prejudice and racial inequality (although I think a lot of it is based more on class than race, per se - it just happens that at this point minorities tend to be more economically disadvantaged than whites).  Another thought - perhaps the best political strategy for minorities is to run as moderate members of the Republican party?  It seems like that might be the easiest way to come into the mainstream - by playing against type, it would assure voters that the candidate is not purely interested in redressing race-based inequalities, but rather is interested in serving as a candidate of all the people (Obama certainly seems to be playing this strategy to the hilt - I almost wonder if he wasn't happy when the talk started that he " wasn't black enough"...).

7

^ 1

Re: Come so far, so far to go...

pO157.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 06:35:15 AM EST

none

(Obama certainly seems to be playing this strategy to the hilt - I almost wonder if he wasn't happy when the talk started that he " wasn't black enough"...).

But he is black enough! He can't get a cab in Manhattan he's so black.

This story: 9 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment