Politics

Yes, Minister

pO157.

Posted to Politics on Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 09:59:12 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Let's assume that, after the latest cabinet reshuffle and bureaucracy creation jobs program, you were recently nominated and confirmed to the President's Cabinet.

Amid the recent the Iraq War, National Debt, Veto of SCHIP, an Immigration position that alienates the majority of his own party and rollbacks of civil liberties it is understandable why the Chief Executive's ratings are in the crapper.

The President's approval rating has been poor at best for the last several months if not years.  Politicians and pundits openly consider his presidency to be one of the more disastrous administrations.

There is nothing that can be done to turn Mr. Bush into a Washington or a Lincoln. The best thing that can be done is to make the most of the last 14 months to pull mediocrity out of the jaws of crushing failure. The only thing left to do is minimize damage. So, let's talk about the good things Mr. Bush has going for him:

  1. He has alienated a metric boatload of political insiders, congressmen, and political insiders -- even those of his own party. Things could not possibly get any worse, so no radical plan would get laughed at. This could even be a time of bridge building and making alliances with members of the opposing party or the opposition. Or, go the unilateral route (since that has been so popular so far) and plead your case directly to the American people.
  2. He does not have to keep Congress happy. Few Representatives or Senators are likely to call on him for his services in the upcoming election and the GOP is already anticipating major losses.
  3. A very unique feature of the upcoming election is that no member of his administration is running for re-election and there is no "Designated Approved" candidate carrying the Bush 43 mantle. In addition, he will likely be free from impeachment, thus enabling a distraction free remainder of the term.
  4. Approval ratings can only go up from here (See #1)!

So, you have the President's hypothetical ear as a newly appointed Secretary. In your few hours of face time, what do you tell him to do with his last few months to end his administration on a high note? (Difficulty: You cannot suggest an early end to the Iraq War -- It is obvious he would not listen and the withdrawal process would probably take more than the remaining year to complete anyway)

Bonus: What Cabinet Secretary would you most likely find yourself nominated as and why?

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, Jim Hacker, George Bush, President Bush, Cabinet, Disaster, Lincoln, Washinton, Lipstick on A Pig, Hurricane, Politics, Advice, CNN, Iraq, Immigration, Deficit, War (all tags)

This story: 7 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

I'll Start -- Flame Away

pO157.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 03:52:47 PM EST

none

Since his foreign policy is in the toilet and the trustworthiness of his administration is probably too low to be taken seriously by any other government I think any changes would have to be made domestically.

  1. Throw a bone to the members of your own party. You know, the ones who voted for you back in the day. Make at least token cuts to welfare, etc spending. Invest these savings in our future along with other funds in a....

  2. Crash science and Education program. Show you are serious about energy independence. Put meaningful monies into alternative energies (nuclear, wind, etc). Consider massive tax credits for those who put solar panels into buildings and such. Invest in life and physical sciences to relieve human suffering. At a minimum, triple the NIH, NSF funding. Give the space program scientifically realistic goals of exploration of places other than near earth orbit. These programs would be hard for future administrations to cut and would help maintain US knowledge supremacy as well as repair the damage caused by low funding in the past.

It's not much, but what can you do when you are already the worst administration in history before your term is up? Perhaps history can remember (in an ironic fashion, of course) that Bush-43 ended up precipitating a golden age of American know-how and technology supremacy.

Bonus: If I was a cabinet secretary I'd probably be the Secretary of Health & Human Services, or perhaps the Secretary of the Interior, because only 1 Secretary since WWII has never lived west of the Mississippi. I fit that bill, and would gladly wear a lot of flannel and hang out at gun clubs for a cushy job with a pension.

4

^ 1

Re: I'll Start -- Flame Away

wetkarma.

Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 03:22:47 AM EST

none

With a democratic congress all those ideas are non-starters. The president can't spend money congress doesn't authorize so scratch the science and education program. Democrats being democrats also won't tolerate any cuts to welfare without rollback of the bush tax cuts.

Were I a cabinet member suckered into serving this administration my three best ideas would be as follows:

  1. Accelerate the S. Korean redeployment and put the troops involved in Afghanistan to hunt bin laden. If successful, it will be a tremendous political boost, if its not successful the troop presence will still have a positive effective in afghanistan to counter the resurging taliban.

  2. Normalize our relationship with Cuba. Our foreign policy with Cuba makes no sense and its an easy political win to appear like a peacemaker.

  3. Strike a trade deal with the arctic circle nations on the northwest passage.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

5

^ 4

Re: I'll Start -- Flame Away

pO157.

Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 06:16:15 AM EST

none

All three of your ideas are good. I disagree that expansion of education and science spending would be a non-starter with a democratic congress. Perhaps the notion to reduce welfare, sure, but I think a strong science bill would have broad bipartisan support.

2

Re: Yes, Minister

tomc.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 05:05:27 PM EST

none

I'd recommend lots of BBQs at the ranch, and get Cheney to gorge himself to ensure he doesn't change his mind and decide to run in 2008.

7

^ 2

Re: Yes, Minister

thefadd.

Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 07:59:25 PM EST

none

Yeah, it's been rough for those two to blow off steam together since they don't let Bush hunt with Cheney anymore.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

3

Re: Yes, Minister

port1080.

Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 10:54:15 PM EST

none

The big problem Bush has right now is that he can't get anything through the Senate. Obviously there aren't enough Republican votes to pass anything, but if he reaches across the aisle to try to rely on purely Democratic party votes, the Republicans still have enough seats to filibuster. This is what has killed measures like the DREAM act and other immigration reform legislation. If I was a Bush adviser, interested in a legacy, I think that the one area that might be open is environmental legislation. I think there's a chance to push through new CAFE standards and a carbon emissions cap and trade scheme. It's the sort of thing that Democrats would find tough to oppose and which a lot of Republican Senators would find hard to filibuster. The way I look at it is that Democrats are almost certain to have the House, Senate, and Presidency come January 2009, and at that point tougher environmental standards will happen. My uncle works for an Industry Leading Power Company (TM), and he says that they are pretty much resigned to the fact that cap and trade will come, and they know it's just a matter of time. If the Bush administration pushes them through now, it can set the terms to be as pro-business as possible, mitigating some of the pain. The legislation couldn't be complete crap, because if it is Democrats won't feel obligated to pass it, but as long as the standards are in the range of 70% to 80% as tough as what an "ideal" Democrat-sponsored bill would be, it could probably pass.

---------------------------------------

If I was a cabinet secretary I'd probably be most qualified for State, given my current pursuit of a PhD in International Relations. I'm not sure that I'm diplomatic enough for it, though...I'd probably make a better National Security Adviser.

6

Re: Yes, Minister

MayorBob.

Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 12:49:31 PM EST

none

Unfortunately, Bush is so sapped of political influence on the Hill, his chances of sponsoring any effective legislation ranges from slim to none.  His only options right now is to keep that veto pen handy when he runs into a piece of legislation that clearly won't survive a veto and smile wanly as he signs the other bills which would trump a veto.  Well, there is one more thing he could do to assert his authority as the Alpha Male among us -- toss a few nukes at the Iranians.  He doesn't need Congressional approval for it -- Hillary et al already gave him cover to fight the War on Terror with whatever means he deems necessary.

At one point, I thought with the dismantling of the Soviet bloc and what we lived through with nuclear armageddon hanging over us for 40+ years, that I'd never be thinking the unthinkable.  But, I do think that George Bush is the one man in the world with the power and inclination to use nuclear arms preemptively.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

This story: 7 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment