Etcetera

What Would Jesus Stalk, Kill, Stuff & Mount?

MayorBob.

Posted to Etcetera on Fri Nov 23, 2007 at 07:59:14 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

When you think Brigham Young University (BYU) you think Mormons or maybe football quarterbacks.  You don't think commissioning the slaughter of rare animals.  But this is exactly what BYU did.  A rare white rhino skin is destined to be mounted in the school's natural history museum.  While this seems just peachy to the benefactor who killed the animal and BYU officials, it's gotten under the skin of animal welfare activists.

Almost as soon as the Salt Lake Tribune reported on BYU benefactor Fred Morris' mission to South Africa, you just knew it wasn't going to end there.  Morris had been recruited to go to South Africa's Mkuze National Park.  Once there, Morris got a license from park authorities allowing him to hunt and kill one white rhinoceros for purposes of display back at BYU.  With this task complete, Morris intends to return to Africa to bag a black rhino, a hippopotamus, and a giraffe for other exhibits.  According to Morris it's his way of not only giving to BYU but giving back to rhinos everywhere:

"It was a privilege, but it is expensive. It's a way to put money into wildlife and know that it really does something."
The reason he says this is that part of the (US)$30,000 Morris paid Mkuze goes to fund populating areas outside the park with excess rhinos.  One group not convinced this was a good move is the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS).  HSUS President Wayne Pacelle wrote a letter to BYU expressing his disapproval, "killing animals for museum exhibition is not acceptable in our day, especially when the target is one of the rarest large mammals in the world."  Pacelle noted "this practice was common a century ago" but that "most reputable museums pursue other strategies for obtaining specimens."  It should be noted that the white rhinoceros, as a species, is listed as "near threatened."   However, the southern variety (hunted by Morris) is more numerous than the northern variety.  Museum vertebrates collection manager Wesley Skidmore said that commissioning Morris to hunt the rhino was more economical because "we don't have the money to buy one."

You might wonder just what sort of sporting endeavor this hunt for a white rhino might be - this video (not of Morris' hunt) will give you an idea.  Not that these hunts are risk-free for the hunter.  Two other hunts last year resulted in the death of one hunter and a goring for a second.  The Tribune weighed in with an editorial, denouncing BYU for conducting a "thrill kill."  The editorial took the school to task for putting itself in a bit of an "ethical bind" as the collections are used to "celebrate the role of Jesus Christ as Creator."

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, animals, hunting, BYU, Mormons, animal exhibits, rare animals (all tags)

This story: 5 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
4

The most dangerous game

Lou.

Sun Dec 02, 2007 at 02:08:58 PM EST

4.00 (funny)

I really don't have a dog in this fight...I guess as long this particular species isn't in immediate danger I can't object any more or less than I do any kind of hunting.  However, to be fair, we should open the hunt to include selected humans.  For instance, I wouldn't mind seeing Pat Robertson stalked, stuffed and mounted...by Larry Craig.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

5

^ 4

Re: The most dangerous game

thefadd.

Tue Dec 04, 2007 at 05:43:46 PM EST

none

but which one would you have to pay?

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

1

Responsible Animal Management

port1080.

Mon Nov 26, 2007 at 09:20:28 AM EST

none

I don't have a huge problem with BYU's actions here. I've never understood the desire to "sport hunt" (I grew up in a hunting family, but we ate what we killed and would never have wasted money to turn carcass into a trophy), but for whatever reason a lot of people (often people with money) are into that sort of thing. If their lack of good sense can be used to extract money for wildlife preservation, then so be it.

Most US states charge hunters a licensing fee and then plow that money back into maintaining state forests and otherwise managing their animal populations. This allows those that want to hunt to hunt, but also gives the state some control (they can restrict the number of licenses given and so on).

Doing the same with endangered species may be somewhat riskier, but given the fact that levels of poaching are still extraordinarily high, from a practical standpoint it's probably better to give hunters a legal outlet and at least get some money out of the process.

Moving back to the BYU case, then, you've got a win-win. This Morris probably would have found a way to bag a Rhino anyway (I wonder what he's compensating for with this behavior??), so by giving him a reasonably productive outlet for his "needs" BYU gets a nice display piece, the Rhino park gets some good money, and Morris gets his jollies. Pretty much a win-win.

Ce n'est pas une pipe. C'est une signature.

2

^ 1

I couldn't agree with you more.

MayorBob.

Mon Nov 26, 2007 at 09:37:57 AM EST

none

It seems to me that HSUS's objections in this case to the bagging of a white rhino is silly.  The southern white rhino might be a rare animal, but it's hardly endangered and South Africa seems to be rather prudential in its issuance of licenses for it.  Plus, the added bit about how problematic the hunt became for two of the hunters (one killed and one gored) sings of poetic justice to me.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

3

Safari

Steve Urkel.

Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 03:49:14 PM EST

none

I see nothing wrong with killing rhinos. Rhinos will kill you if you give them chance. How do people think Audabon got those birds to hold still so he could paint portraits of them?

This story: 5 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment