Etcetera

Dead Dog Wagging

MayorBob.

Posted to Etcetera on Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 08:51:03 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

When a person is subjected to an unprovoked mauling from a dog, most communities would show a little sympathy for the human victim.  Some of them might want to know when the dog will be euthanized.  Some might even want the owners to face criminal charges.  But Princeton, New Jersey is not your average community - it's a well-to-do Ivy League town.  And the human victim isn't your average Princetonian - he's a landscaper from Honduras.  Thus, the community's rallying around the dog while the victim's the target of anti-immigration invective.

It was this past June when Giovanni Rivera showed up at Guy and Elizabeth James' home to take care of the yard.  Rivera, who may or may not be in the US legally, was attacked by Congo, the James' 75-pound German Shepherd.  According to the James, Rivera was frightened by Congo and grabbed onto Mrs. James, trying to use her for a shield.  He received numerous bites and claw marks and he required 65 rabies shots and five days in the hospital.  Eventually, he received a (US)$250,000 settlement from the James' homeowner insurance policy.  Meanwhile, it was off to the pound for Congo, where a township judge pronounced him a "vicious dog" and the attack as unprovoked.  Under New Jersey law that got Congo sent to Doggy Death Row.

There was solid sentiment in Princeton not to put Congo down.  Indeed, during the trial, an animal behaviorist gave testimony that Congo was "simply doing his job" by "protecting his owner the way any responsible canine would under the circumstances."  Letters attesting to knowing Congo, talking about how "friendly and warm" Congo really was, were given to the judge.  Groups of angry Princetonians have demonstrated in front of the township office in support of Congo.  New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine has been inundated with thousands of messages on this matter, most of them asking that he step in and pardon Congo.  Corzine said he'll leave Congo's fate up to the court, but a spokesperson said Corzine would "love to see the dog survive because he knows how much people care about their pets."  State Assemblyman Neil Cohen (D - Union) introduced "Congo's Law" which would give judges greater leeway in deciding how to deal with vicious dogs.

The furor over Congo had another dimension as people began venting their anger towards Mr. Rivera. Most of the anger has been posted on the local newspaper's web site.  Virtually every story about Congo run in the paper has drawn attacks on Rivera and questions regarding his immigration status.  One person commented: "The dog deserves an award.  One less Mexican (sic) alien is a boost to society."  One Hispanic immigrant observed things might have turned out differently if the victim weren't an alien:

"Maybe they would have killed the dog already.  This country values Americans."
Local resident Jonathan Eckstein asked that the legislature reject Cohen's "absurd legislation" to which another resident responded by saying the landscaper brought on the attack by being "ignorant."  The matter could be resolved by the James' accepting an offer from the local prosecutor.  If they agreed to Congo accepting certain restrictions as a "potentially dangerous" dog, he won't be put down.  The James, who pled guilty to maintaining unlicensed and unvaccinated dogs, claim this whole case is "insanity" and refuse to accept the deal and want all of their dogs cleared of all charges and labels.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, animals, dog attack, immigration, New Jersey (all tags)

This story: 5 comments (5 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
2

sauce for the goose

gerrymander.

Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 11:28:53 AM EST

5.00 (brilliant, funny)

The James' are going about this all wrong. The dog has been released from the animal shelter to be kept under "house arrest", right? And part of the issue at hand is that Congo was never properly licensed?

Clearly, what the James family should do is two-fold. First, drive Congo out of New Jersey to stay at the house of a relative or friend for about a month, then publicly claim that "Congo escaped when they weren't looking." Second, after the month goes by, the family can claim that they were despondent over the loss of their previous dog, and found a "suitable replacement to console them" from the relative/friend they left Congo with. Then, the German shepherd can be legally registered as "Congo the Second" (affectionately referred to as "Congo" by the family).

Voilà! The problem gets solved with a solution that removes the potential death sentence from the dog and becomes a statement on illegal immigration at the same time. (How's that taste, Señor Rivera?)

1

The red herring of illegal immigration

wetkarma.

Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 09:31:04 AM EST

none

Personally I'm choosing to ignore the illegal immigration aspect of the case - as far as I can tell, the dog was poorly trained and followed its pack instincts of 'protecting' its master/mistress.  I think it would be tragic to kill the dog for this reason but then I freely admit to being a lover of dogs.

While I wish that the James themselves were punished via a fine for not having vaccinated the dog, I'm frankly amazed that legislation equivalent to 'Congo's Law' is not already on the books.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

3

Dial Down the Rhetoric

pO157.

Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 03:35:22 PM EST

none

I agree with the upthread comments. The immigration status of the workers are a red herring, the real problems are 1) Owners who do not properly train their dogs or vaccinate them and 2) lack of judicial discretion for dog bite cases.

I have a 2+ year old beagle mix who we adopted when she was 9 months old and 3 days from execution at a SPCA. Apparently she had been in the custody of the PA SPCA since she was ~3 months old after being tied to the front door in the middle of the winter night by some scumbag piece of trash asshole*. We have properly trained her as best we can, and [this is the big part] socialized her to different people and different situations to the point where I believe we could even let her off leash in public and she would be okay (when we visit people in rural wooded areas she follows commands and returns, seemingly not having the problem common with beagles and scent trails).

Since the owners did not care enough to get their dog vaccinated I am going to go out on a limb and say he was not properly trained. That is not to say it is a bad dog by nature, mostly bad owners. The dog needs to have been trained what to do in the event of an 'intruder.' In our case, our beagle simply barks and gets our attention. When people come over or meet with us in the yard she usually stands behind us and yelps. For example, when the security company came over one day and I went outside to greet them she ran out (found out she learned how to open doors somehow) and circled behind me in the yard growling. Once she heard the conversation was okay and we shook hands she calmed down and they went into the house no problem. Five minutes later she was even bringing them her ball to play fetch with her. That is because she has been trained, I am guessing Congo was not.

What we need to do is punish moron owners. I am tired of living in the city and having idiots leaving their dogs outside in cages all day while on a short chain leash and then wondering why they behave badly. Or, who let their [unlicensed] dogs run loose and can't control them. Also, the people who fight dogs should be shot. Repeatedly.

Sadly, what I have noticed in general is the worst abusers tend to be part of the uneducated trashier elements of society and when you try to reason with them it does not work work. The James family needs to stop being negligent and vaccinate its pets. Also, they need to make sure the dog is inside and away from any workers way before they show up and train them how to deal with people. Owning dogs is a major commitment and I hate to see people do it half assed.

*=Pejorative description of previous 'owner' toned down due to the family nature of TnT. Had this been an in person discussion it would have consisted of several minutes of biting invective and resulted in me having to take out a personal loan to pay off a Swear Jar somewhere.

5

^ 3

Rabies

Shy Elf.

Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 02:25:47 PM EST

4.00 (informative)

Sign me up to be lightly mauled for $250,000.

There doesn't seem to be anything  wrong with how the case was handled to me.  There are basically three types of violent dogs, dogs who will attack anything, dogs who are poorly trained and will attack where they see a threat and are not trained well enough to be easily stopped, and dogs who will attack where they are trained to.  The difference between the second and the third is dependent mostly on how well the dog has been trained, and German Shepherds are notorious for falling into the second and third categories, which is why they are the dog most commonly used as police attack dogs.  Clearly this dog belongs in in the second category, and the prosecutor has offered a deal to put the dog in the "potentially violent" category where it belongs, so I don't see anything wrong with charging it as a dog in the first category and trying to get a plea deal.

The reason the laws on violent dogs are the way the are, in most states at least, is almost entirely due to rabies.  Since the first sign of rabies is often a dog becoming more aggressive, a dog bite makes it more that the dog has rabies.  If the dog is not tested for rabies, usually the bite victim will be given expensive and painful rabies shots (this seems excessive in the less rabies-prone states, but that's probabilistically weighing human health against money and dog health).  Testing whether the dog has rabies is much, much cheaper and more reliable if the dog is killed, so most states mandate that dogs which bite people be killed and tested for rabies.

Now that dog vaccination and stray pickup are the norm, rabies is no longer endemic in dog populations.  It's endemic mostly in raccoons and bats.  With infection rates as low as they are, it appears to barely survive there, so it may make sense to thin out host animal populations a bit and eliminate it from the U.S.

4

^ 3

Re: Dial Down the Rhetoric

thefadd.

Sun Dec 02, 2007 at 01:25:47 AM EST

none

Owners who do not properly train their dogs or vaccinate them

From my reading, the unvaccinated dogs were the puppies that were only in the process of finishing their whole set of shots because they were puppies.

Certainly dogs need to have a certain level of training if you're going to have anyone on your property but it seems to me that that level doesn't need to be as high when they live in their own 10 acres.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

This story: 5 comments (5 from subqueue)
Post a Comment