SciTech

What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

MayorBob.

Posted to SciTech on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 06:18:32 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

If you go to an expert for advice, you can generally rely upon getting all the information you need to make a decision.  But, if you go to a doctor, you might not get that sort of treatment.  According to a major study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a disturbing number of doctors feel there are topics they can discuss and those they can't.  The line separating what they'll discuss with a patient happens to be that doctor's personal moral code.  In some instances, if the issue the patient most needs to know about is one their doctor believes conflicts with his or her moral code, they might not even be referred to a doctor qualified to perform it.

The study team from the University of Chicago sent out questionnaires to 1,800 physicians and received 1,144 responses.    The study revealed that a majority (63%) of doctors felt an obligation to discuss their moral or religious beliefs regarding treatments being pursued.  A majority  believed all treatment options should be presented (86%) and patients should be referred to a doctor who would treat them (71%).  However, a significant percentage of doctors were unsure (15%) or did not feel the need to discuss their beliefs with the patients (22%).  Significant number of unsure or opposed were reflected on the need to discuss treatment options - unsure (6%) and shouldn't be discussed (8%) - as well as an obligation to refer them to another doctor  -- unsure (11%) and shouldn't refer (18%).

The numbers of those unsure or opposed has Stanford University bioethicist David Magnus concerned, "that means that there are a lot of physicians out there who are not, in fact, doing the right thing."  American Medical Association policy does allow doctors to decline to give treatment under certain conditions, one of which is a conflict with "the physician's personal, religious or moral beliefs."  However the AMA does also say doctors have a responsibility to "ensure access to adequate health care."  In Magnus' mind a physician's "conscientious objection" must end when it conflicts with "the rights of the patient."

The medical issues which were the most worrisome for some doctors were abortion, teen birth control, and terminal sedation for dying patients.  The respondents indicating opposition to discussing treatment options for these or referring patients to doctors with fewer qualms identified themselves as "very religious" and were largely Protestants and Catholics.  A very real problem area, according to Magnus, might be doctors holding these beliefs working in emergency medicine where they may be treating patients requiring emergency contraception.  Another doctor said that physicians opposed to emergency contraception ought not be working in emergency rooms.  A good deal of heat and anger has been generated over pharmacists allowing their moral and religious codes to trump physicians' orders for certain prescriptions.  Is it right that physicians should be allowed to do the same for needed medical treatments?

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, medicine, moral and religious codes, doctors, abortion, birth control (all tags)

This story: 20 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
6

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

dzetetes.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 09:39:26 PM EST

5.00 (brilliant)

Another doctor said that physicians opposed to emergency contraception ought not be working in emergency rooms.

Physicians opposed on the basis of personal beliefs to safe, effective, approved treatments that are the best option for a given patient ought not be working in medicine.

In regione caecorum, rex est luscus.

3

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

Thalia.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 08:36:19 PM EST

4.00 (astute)

Let me get this straight.  There is a percentage of doctors who will hide treatment options from you because of their own beliefs, and will not tell you about these beliefs?  I don't want to know what religion my doctor is, and I'm sure she cares about my beliefs as little as I care about hers.  BUT it is her obligation to tell me all of the options that are available to me, and the pros & cons of each of those.  If the cons include negatives that arise from her faith/belief/prejudices, that's fine.  But simply not telling me all the options, without informing me of that intention, violates ethical rules pretty severely.  Now I wonder how many of these doctors would be honest if a patient directly asked about their beliefs.  Maybe it's time to go through a questionaire with my doc.

Thalia

1

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

thefadd.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 08:00:17 PM EST

none

After two apparently non-life threatening but highly annoying medical conditions in the past 7 seven years I have basically given up on modern mainstream American medicine. I have some luxury here, in that I am fully insured through my employer so should anything go catastrophically wrong (knock on wood -- he he, modern technology and we still knock wood cause it 'can't hurt'), I can theoretically fall back upon that. But after going to a string of doctors through my PPO who acknowledged my problems but could not come up with any long term solutions, I gave up and went to a holistic, naturopathic doctor. Not only did he find solutions to those problems but he told me about other things I needed to do to get ahead of the curve on problems that might arise as I get older.

In addition to that, my girlfriend has had the misfortune of knowing several people with various forms of cancer over the past 10 years. The three who went the holistic, naturopathic route are all alive today. The other 5 or so are all dead. The medical established in this country is essentially fucked from all angles and until it straightens itself out and puts health before money (which I don't see it doing), it can fuck off for all the reasons in the write-up and many more.

escalators never fail; they just become stairs

2

^ 1

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

coquito.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 08:19:25 PM EST

5.00

I just have to pick up on the cancer thread here quickly. Just a couple of days ago I found out a friend of ours has cancer. She's 31. Six months ago, we found out another friend had cancer, she's 30. In the past... 5, 6 years, at least 6 of our friends, all below the age of 30 (most under 25) have had cancer. The type and severity has varied, but I find it... surprising that we know so many people who've been diagnosed with cancer at such a young age. It just seems improbable.
The holistic/mainstream thing is a touchy issue though. I can't say one approach has worked much better than any other so far (thank goodness, no one has died yet, though a coupe of our friends have very bad progonses) but there is one friend in particular who has been relying on a "holistic" therapy which I'd prefer not to name right this second which we're convinced is a complete and utter hoax. While her cancer seems to "gotten better" (I'd be more technical, but she's eschewing actual doctors, so I can't be), it seems very dubious that the "treatment" she's using is doing much more than bilking her out of money.
I don't mean that to denigrate your approach in any way. I don't think all "alternative" forms of medicine are bad. Let's just say that if it's stacked like a pyramid scheme...

Now with caps!

4

^ 2

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

Thalia.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 08:41:53 PM EST

5.00

Conventional medicine is much closer to a pyramid scheme in terms of pricing and structure.  You go to your doctor, who orders tests.  You pay for the tests, and then go back to the doctor who referred you (who also gets money from the testing place), for analysis.  The testing place doesn't give you the results directly.  You wilI then be given a perscription for expensive medications, and the manufacturers of those medications have been paying your doctor for perscribing it.  If you happen into a difficult to diagnose situation, you can repeat this cycle dozens of times.  In contrast, most alternative medical providers I've found run the tests inhouse, give you results almost immediately, and provide the medicines directly.  

Thalia

5

^ 4

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

dzetetes.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 09:32:49 PM EST

none

You go to your doctor, who orders tests.  You pay for the tests, and then go back to the doctor who referred you (who also gets money from the testing place), for analysis.  The testing place doesn't give you the results directly.

My primary care physician is a salaried employee of a medical facility/diagnostic clinic that does its own testing in house.  He doesn't get any kickbacks for ordering tests.

I recently had some blood work done there, and the results were sent directly to me in the mail, although I also had the option to have a copy included in my medical file.  Whenever my doctor has ordered tests, he's always been happy to give me a copy of the results upon request.  I haven't bothered to ask often, for the very reason that the results aren't sent directly to me: I usually have no idea how to interpret them.  

You wilI then be given a perscription for expensive medications, and the manufacturers of those medications have been paying your doctor for perscribing it.

I recently went to a specialist for a problem that had been bothering me for a couple of months.  After talking about the problem with me in depth and doing everything short of ordering expensive tests to make a diagnosis, he wrote me two prescriptions for medicines whose patents expired years ago.  Total cost for the prescriptions, without prescription insurance: about $9 (with tax).  It might have been almost ten.  It was less than ten, though.

Maybe they're just putting on a hell of a good show, and they're stealing from my wallet while I'm changing, but my doctors have almost always gone to great lengths to save me money.  They usually prescribe tried-and-true medicines that are available as generics, and when they feel that a newer medicine would work better, they give me samples.  I had another medical problem last year, and the doctor I got in to see at urgent care (not my PCP or the specialist I mentioned above) wanted me on a medication that's about $3-4 per pill.  I didn't even have the chance to express reservations about the price: he wanted me to take a 14 day course of the medication, and gave me a month's supply of samples without me asking.  I still have a bunch of the samples in my medicine cabinet.

It's not hard to find imperfections in our medical system (and I'm speaking of the whole shebang, from medical training, to insurance, to the development, marketing, and prescribing of drugs, etc), and I have my share of mediocre to poor experiences with doctors and medical facilities, as I'm sure we all do.  Before we completely hijack this story, however, let's remember that we beat the topic of conventional/alternative medicine into the ground a few months ago in discussing Starchild Abraham Cherrix.

As a side note, Mr. Cherrix has voluntarily returned to Mississippi for more radiation, since the alternative treatment he was pursuing hasn't worked.

In regione caecorum, rex est luscus.

10

^ 5

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

Thalia.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:10:02 PM EST

none

Clearly I need to find a better set of providers.  My doctors are very good at what they do, but they do tend to perscribe the $1/pill version instead of the generics.

Thalia

13

^ 5

Which no one could've predicted

Steve Urkel.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:28:54 PM EST

none

"since the alternative treatment he was pursuing hasn't worked."

To be fair, most healers and Swamis don't claim smearing herbs on yourself is 100% effective.

8

^ 4

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

coquito.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 10:14:21 PM EST

none

Conventional medicine is much closer to a pyramid scheme in terms of pricing and structure.

While your criticism of conventional medicine may be fair to some extent, what I'm talking about here is an actual pyramid scheme. I'm not maligning acupuncture, or herbs, I'm talking about an actual pyramic scheme. Maybe the stuff they sell works, I don't know, but their "science" sounds like bunk and their "pricing structure" sounds alot less benevolent than conventional medicine.

And, on second thought, you're maligning some people I know personally and who I know don't just prescribe medicine they're being paid to sell. Doctors - maybe not all, but alot of them - put a great deal of time and effort into learning a stupefying amount of information that they put to work to help people. That they can't grind up their own medicines or run all their own tests isn't their fault, and it isn't, in and of itself, a reason to assume they're just there to make money.

Now with caps!

9

^ 8

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

Thalia.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:08:44 PM EST

none

Ah, I've never encounted an actual pyramid scheme, outside of the Herbalife/Avon/Tupperware folks.

There are a lot of good doctors, and I like my doctors too.  But the feedback system is screwed up badly, because the patient is not the customer.  I wasn't arguing that doctors were in it for money, just that the cycle of visit-test-perscription was a lot closer to a pyramid scheme were you hire someone who hires someone than most alternative medicine (which tends to involve single practitioners who do everything inhouse).

11

^ 4

Put some herbs on it

Steve Urkel.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:19:58 PM EST

none

"If you happen into a difficult to diagnose situation, you can repeat this cycle dozens of times"

That's an outrage. Why waste time trying to figure out what the problem is by doing a bunch of fancy tests based on science when you could've been smearing herbs on yourself from the beginning?

"I've found run the tests inhouse, give you results almost immediately, and provide the medicines directly."

I'm sure this couldn't possibly be because the tests are bogus, the diagnoses are imagined, and the "medicines" don't do anything, no the only rational explanation is Western Medicine is a hoax on a massive scale. Herbs, baby!

15

^ 11

Re: Put some herbs on it

Thalia.

Fri Feb 09, 2007 at 05:26:27 PM EST

5.00 (brilliant)

I didn't say western medicine is a hoax.  I wouldn't go anywhere else if I had a broken bone.  But if you have a chronic condition of any sort, you will find Western medicine has difficulties properly diagnosing it.  And herbs do work on your body.  Even Western medicine acknowledges that when it it uses the effective ingredients from herbs to make "proper" medicine.

Thalia

16

^ 15

Re: Put some herbs on it

Steve Urkel.

Fri Feb 09, 2007 at 06:53:17 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

"But if you have a chronic condition of any sort, you will find Western medicine has difficulties properly diagnosing it"

The more chronic your condition the more foolish it is to have some charlatan attempting to treat than a real doctor. But it's a free country, I'll take diagnostic methods such as blood tests and MRI's, you can have the Shaman down at the herbal academy diagnosing you by sensing your aura with his third eye-chakra.

(I'm guessing no matter what he imagines you have, the cure's going to be some herbs he happens to have around. Just a guess.)

17

^ 15

Re: Put some herbs on it

charlies.

Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 02:33:44 AM EST

none

"...if you have a chronic condition...Western medicine has difficulties properly diagnosing it."

I disagree, Thalia. I hang out with a couple of docs, and we talk about this stuff a lot. Most of the complaints against "Western" medicine come from the extravagant expectations Americans have of the universe, and from the history of medicine.

Infectious disease is a horrible drain on the Third World. For all the touching stories about techno-millionaires dying of cancer, day after day after day more human beings die of malaria than any other single cause. Western medicine works wonderfully against infectious diseases.

No one in my family has died of malaria for three generations.

Western medicine is also very good at diagnosis. You know how the doc takes your hand at the beginning of an exam? One of my friends mentioned that he could understand why palm readers were so popular with some folks; he told me that a good look at the back of your hand would tell him about your diet, exercise, health history, a rough idea how long you would live, and a rough idea of what would kill you.

Unfortunately, he added, there was damnned little he could do about the last two. And that may be the problem. He said he could, with a blood test, diagnose whether a patient had Guianne-Barre' or chronic fatigue syndrome; but the problem was that the treatment for both is the same, and it hasn't changed much in 500 years, except that docs don't use leeches much any more.

January 20, 2009. Justice becomes possible.

19

^ 17

Leeches and now...maggots!

Lou.

Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 09:52:36 AM EST

4.00 (informative)

Actually, these creepy crawlers are making a comeback.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

20

^ 19

Re: Leeches and now...maggots!

Lou.

Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 09:53:47 AM EST

none

I meant to add...be careful of the pictures in the link...not for the weak of stomach.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

18

^ 17

Re: Put some herbs on it

Thalia.

Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 04:20:12 AM EST

none

I've never had anyone but alternative doctors take a good look at my hands.  That is the type of diagnosis of your overall health that I usually miss in conventional doctors.  Your doctor buddies sound pretty cool.  

And I do agree that malaria, malnutrition, and the lack of availability of clean water are the biggest killers in the world by far.  And for those things, nothing beats conventional medicine & science.

Thalia

7

^ 2

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

port1080.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 09:52:18 PM EST

none

The holistic/mainstream thing is a touchy issue though.

Here's to that - of the people in my life who have had cancer of one form or another, the two who did holistic treatments both died, but only after getting their hopes raised and then having them dashed completely. Holistic "doctors" are not regulated in or held accountable in any meaningful way. If you find one that knows what's what, that's great - but the odds are just as good that you're going to waste your money on a quack who talks a good show but doesn't know jack shit about what's actually ailing you. Many, if not most, are simply preying on people who are their weakest and most open to exploitation. Mainstream medicine certainly has its problems, but at least there are some standards and some methods of accountability.

A random historical anecdote for those who laud "Eastern" medicine - during the latter half of the 19th century, when China and Japan were becoming more exposed to the West, the one thing Western item that was in the highest demand was Western medical expertise. It turns out that even 1880s medical techniques were advanced enough to drastically decrease the mortality rate, and to treat conditions that traditional procedures had no answer for. If you look at the biography of many of China's most important public figures of the 1890-1930 period, a large portion of them started out their careers by going to the US or Japan for training in Western medicine.

14

^ 1

Chemical Death Medicine worked for me

3fingerspointback.

Fri Feb 09, 2007 at 04:31:47 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

Six cycles of CHOP and 40 Gray to the chest, and six years later I'm in better shape than before I had lymphoma.  If I'd followed the advice of the chiropractors I was seeing for the pain in my back, I would most likely be in a wheelchair and/or dead right now.

I think there are two problems with the medical establishment as-is.  First, its reluctance to accept a method of accountability for bad doctors, which raises the insurance rates for all doctors which is passed on to medical consumers.  Second, the medical system is fused together with the fucked-up health insurance system in this country, so medical care becomes a matter of balancing patient treatment against gaming the insurer's rules to maximize income.

(is 3fingerspointback)

12

^ 1

Re: What The Doctor Won't Discuss.

Steve Urkel.

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:22:41 PM EST

none

"The three who went the holistic, naturopathic route are all alive today. The other 5 or so are all dead. "

Well, that proves it.

This story: 20 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment