What The Doctor Won't Discuss.
MayorBob.
Posted to SciTech on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 06:18:32 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.
If you go to an expert for advice, you can generally rely upon getting all the information you need to make a decision. But, if you go to a doctor, you might not get that sort of treatment. According to a major study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a disturbing number of doctors feel there are topics they can discuss and those they can't. The line separating what they'll discuss with a patient happens to be that doctor's personal moral code. In some instances, if the issue the patient most needs to know about is one their doctor believes conflicts with his or her moral code, they might not even be referred to a doctor qualified to perform it.
The study team from the University of Chicago sent out questionnaires to 1,800 physicians and received 1,144 responses. The study revealed that a majority (63%) of doctors felt an obligation to discuss their moral or religious beliefs regarding treatments being pursued. A majority believed all treatment options should be presented (86%) and patients should be referred to a doctor who would treat them (71%). However, a significant percentage of doctors were unsure (15%) or did not feel the need to discuss their beliefs with the patients (22%). Significant number of unsure or opposed were reflected on the need to discuss treatment options - unsure (6%) and shouldn't be discussed (8%) - as well as an obligation to refer them to another doctor -- unsure (11%) and shouldn't refer (18%).
The numbers of those unsure or opposed has Stanford University bioethicist David Magnus concerned, "that means that there are a lot of physicians out there who are not, in fact, doing the right thing." American Medical Association policy does allow doctors to decline to give treatment under certain conditions, one of which is a conflict with "the physician's personal, religious or moral beliefs." However the AMA does also say doctors have a responsibility to "ensure access to adequate health care." In Magnus' mind a physician's "conscientious objection" must end when it conflicts with "the rights of the patient."
The medical issues which were the most worrisome for some doctors were abortion, teen birth control, and terminal sedation for dying patients. The respondents indicating opposition to discussing treatment options for these or referring patients to doctors with fewer qualms identified themselves as "very religious" and were largely Protestants and Catholics. A very real problem area, according to Magnus, might be doctors holding these beliefs working in emergency medicine where they may be treating patients requiring emergency contraception. Another doctor said that physicians opposed to emergency contraception ought not be working in emergency rooms. A good deal of heat and anger has been generated over pharmacists allowing their moral and religious codes to trump physicians' orders for certain prescriptions. Is it right that physicians should be allowed to do the same for needed medical treatments?
< Holy Disingenuosity, Batman! S. Jobs Calls For End To DRM
