Music

A Band Reconsidered: Squirrel Nut Zippers

uncarved block.

Posted to Music on Thu May 24, 2007 at 09:07:41 PM EST (promoted by 1fastdog). RSS.

One of the better one hit wonder bands of the 90s is back on the road. Kind of.

  The swing revival of the mid 1990s brought about many things: an increase in cigar and hard liquor sales, increased employment for horn players and dance instructors who had talents grunge and rap bands didn't need, and a chance to swagger about in some very nice clothes for a change. Interestingly, one of the bands that could be pointed to as a vanguard of the revival never felt comfortable with the label: The Squirrel Nut Zippers.
   What were Squirrel Nut Zippers? A postmodernist band plundering the past via pastiche? A roots group that created tributes rather than performing covers? At the time, categorizing the band was of a concern to those reporting on the group, and the task has not gotten easier with a decade to think it over. The music business can be unkind to those without a clear calling card, and the eventual demise of the SNZ was probably hastened by record executives who were unsure how to market a band that had gone platinum (the Hot album), and seemed hell bent on adding even more musical variety to their sound.
   Personal and financial differences didn't help either. Interviews with Tom Maxwell and Ken Mosher after the fact reveal a band that could barely stand speaking, much less playing together. A lawsuit by the company that owned the company that gave the Squirrel Nut Zippers their name may have been the last straw, and confirms the old saw that a "verbal agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on." But even a documentary from better days (24 min. YouTube clip) shows the cracks were already there, at least with the benefit of hindsight. (For fans of the band, the clip also shows Jimbo Mathus at his most stationery, showing that the man did, in fact, stop moving once in a while.)
   Many bands become one hit wonders, and many bands are torn apart by personality clashes-- why focus on the Zippers? From this keyboard, there are many. While musicians may complain about having to project an image, the Zippers show the peril of losing control of how you're perceived. (Many fans were surprised to learn there was a female vocalist in the band after they bought the CD.) Another is the question of influence: Velvet Underground was different from anything else at the time, but the band has inspired generations of musicians. Did the Zippers inspire any musicians to look to the past for inspiration? What are the chances they ever will?
   The chances of this are better than ever. Their official site lists several concerts that came to be. The band's myspace account lists nearly a dozen more tour dates through the spring and summer. A revival of an interesting band? A last fizzle, to be duly noted by music historians? Maxwell and Mosher aren't along for the ride, and the band can't be the same without the duo. All I can say is that I wish those locations were closer to where I live.

Tags: written by uncarved block, edited by 1fastdog, music, Squirrel Nut Zippers, swing (all tags)

This story: 15 comments (3 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

What Were Squirrel Nut Zippers?

thefadd.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 02:25:21 PM EST

none

These were squirrel nut zippers.

Seriously, though, the band was pretty groovy back in the day. A college girlfriend new somebody who knew somebody who was in the band before they made it big and I remember hearing them just before they became popular and being rather unimpressed. Their stuff kind of grew on me and I remember seeing them live at one of those radio station sponsored summer concert tours. The swing craze in general was kinda cool althought most of the people who got waaay into it did come off as vaguely pretentious. It seems a bit early for a revival of the retro-swing dance era but if these guys have put together some groovy new tunes, I'd give them a listen.

make it rain you nappy headed ho's

2

The first internet stars

3fingerspointback.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 05:41:07 PM EST

none

If SNZ formed today, they would be a blip among all the other quirky bands that are reviving swing, folk, roots, bluegrass, whatever.  I don't think that's because all these groups were inspired by the Zippers, but because our Long Tail Society makes it easy for anyone with access to MySpace to find all the weird little acts that would never get airplay in their local markets, let alone nationally.  That the Zippers were killed by bad marketing demonstrates how inappropriate the major label approach was for them.  The only trick for them now is to figure out how to go platinum in the first place.

(is 3fingerspointback)

3

^ 2

Re: The first internet stars

thefadd.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 09:12:29 PM EST

none

They were the high end of a niche craze. You couldn't keep 23 year olds at swing dance clubs forever.

make it rain you nappy headed ho's

4

^ 3

The Funny Thing Is

uncarved block.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 10:18:23 PM EST

none

   I can see why the group was hesitant about the whole "swing" label anyway; even besides Mathus' talk about "hot jazz", there weren't many songs on any of the albums, much less the first one, that one could really dance to. "Danny Diamond" was the song that sold me on Whalen and the band when I heard it the first time, but I'll be damned if I can think of the moves that you'd do to it. (NB I'm not much of a dancer, so take that with a bit of salt.) Definitely a band for the ears rather than the feet, if you will.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

5

^ 2

On A Totally Unconnected Point

uncarved block.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 10:41:35 PM EST

none

   For some strange reason, it occurred to me that the original Terminator movie would have been a lot different in the days of MySpace-- instead of just going through the phone book the Terminator could have found several images on-line, maybe even found the right woman the first time.
   Heh. Could be potential for a short Internet movie spoof there.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

6

Thinking About Talent

uncarved block.

Fri May 25, 2007 at 11:33:21 PM EST

none

    Great. I finally get my act together to do a story, and I pick a three day weekend to get it posted ;)
    In one of his books, Jung talks about the most difficult personality conflicts he'd seen being not between a virtue and a vice, but between two virtues-- say between charity and being a loving spouse, or friendliness and civic service. Both sides can claim something good if they dominate, and the poor psyche stuck in the middle can get torn apart.
   The Squirrel Nut Zippers, from the outside, appear to have had similar problems, even above and beyond the usual "band drama" that's part of the business. With the apparent ease which they could incorporate various styles, the group never had to develop a core sound to hand their hat on. Egalitarian? Sure, but when everyone gets a say, it can be hard to leave somebody out, even if the contribution isn't the best. (Don Raleigh apparently walked out over something like this.) And while Mathus and Maxwell had a genius knack for making new songs sound like something that had been around for decades, this meant they were going to appeal mainly to fans who weren't too purist, but willing to take a chance on something that "sounded old" (not always a virtue in American pop culture.) Sometimes talent can actually be a detriment to fame, it appears . . .
    More mundane factors must have hurt too. Bands that are trios and foursomes break up over royalty distribution among members-- imagine splitting the money six or even seven ways! Even a fair cut would probably feel slight; Chris Phillips as much as says so with that clowning in the documentary ("a never ending flow of cash money!") Marriage is usually bad in bands too, and Jimbo, from his demeanor, seems to be a teensy-weensy bit of a control freak. Maxwell, if you read the interview, admits to being a "hothead" and "loudmouth" who drank to cope with the band. I might use the word "asshole", but hey, I never met the guy.
   Which is a shame, because the Zippers, IMHO, showed promise that you could follow a middle path between (often sterile) purism and a slavish desire for "the new" that also dogs music fans. Taking the past and making it breathe again ain't easy, but it can't be as hard as the dearth of risk takers like the SNZ makes it seem.
   Or maybe that's too optimistic.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

7

^ 6

Re: Thinking About Talent

thefadd.

Sat May 26, 2007 at 12:01:26 AM EST

none

Too much is made in the industry aspect of the music industry of "having a sound." You could level the "too much from too many different backgrounds" at the Rolling Stones except that, well, you can't really level any legitimate criticism at the Rolling Stones. But can you really say Wild Horses and Dude (Looks Like A Lady) have the same sound? SNZ were spiffy because they rocked out a bit in an upbeat friendly way.

make it rain you nappy headed ho's

8

^ 7

Re: Thinking About Talent

MC Nally.

Sat May 26, 2007 at 12:55:55 AM EST

5.00 (astute)

But can you really say Wild Horses and Dude (Looks Like A Lady) have the same sound?
I'd say one sounds like the Rolling Stones and the other sounds like Aerosmith.  Was it some sort of trick question?

9

^ 8

Re: Thinking About Talent

thefadd.

Sat May 26, 2007 at 06:20:21 PM EST

none

I don't know why I confused that. Maybe the pantheses confused me when I was googling specific names of examples. Substitute It's Only Rock 'n' Roll (But I Like It) or (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction.

make it rain you nappy headed ho's

10

^ 7

Points Taken

uncarved block.

Mon May 28, 2007 at 11:46:59 AM EST

none

   There's a fine line between praise and being a fanboy, and I probably cut out the part about thinking this wasn't the greatest band of all time. (One of the charming things about going through interviews for the research was hearing how many times band members said, "we couldn't play that." False modesty? Depends on where you stand, I guess.) The thing was, I wanted to go a little bit beyond just saying, "Hey! I like these guys" in a comment-- in fact, I'd like to start a strain of music subs along these lines*, but that may be a little ambitious. Three good albums is rare enough in the music business, but it's not as if nobody else had ever done it.
   Rethinking it, I guess the conflict was less over "having a sound" than conflicts (as I sense it) over priorities, and over which of the lead singers should get attention. Personally, I think the label (and perhaps the band) were idiots for not trying to ride Katherine Whalen's voice to the top. All the other top swing bands were, near as I can recall, led by male vocalists, with more than a little "tough guy posing brought into the mix (Big Bad Voodoo Daddy, say, or even Brian Setzer.) There may have been other groups with good female leads, but SNZ were the ones in place to capitalize on their good luck after "Hell"-- but they didn't. Was she too shy? Was the label to blame? Band rivalries? I guess we'll find out much later, if ever, since nobody seems willing to talk about it now, not that I could find. Whatever the reason, I think it's bad (not tragic) that this opportunity was missed.
   More of a reply than you anyone really needed, I guess, but I had a half hour to kill before work, and none of this was offensive or insulting.

   *Other bands I've looked at include Wall Of Voodoo, the Moody Blues, and perhaps Roxy Music. Anyone who wanted to jump on with their own group would be welcome, though I remember that the Plastic Classic Band had many who loved and loathed it.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

11

Re: A Band Reconsidered: Squirrel Nut Zippers

Tom Maxwell.

Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 12:34:22 PM EST

none

Hey y'all.

It's me, that Tom Maxwell.  Found this after some surfing, and appreciate the thoughtfulness in the writing.  I'm happy to answer any questions.  (After which, uncarved block, you're welcome to label me "asshole!" ;) )  Alternatively, if it weirds anybody out to have me sit in, I'll be on my way.

I blogged a little about the Zippers' "reunion" here: www.myspace.com/tom_maxwell

A couple off-the-cuff comments.  I fought the "swing" moniker tooth and claw, because most of the music was boat-anchor, and it was obvious (especially after the "khakis swing" ad) that the sell-by date was fast approaching.  Of course, Setzer covered the Louis Prima song featured in the ad, and had a huge hit.  My Chapel Hill DIY attitude found this gauche.  I guess he wept all the way to the bank.

The label worked the shit out of the fad because it dropped in their lap.  It wasn't in their interest, as it was in ours, for us to crank out a record a year and sell maybe 50K units.  Better to wring as much out of the thing as possible (the release of "Perennial" was held up a year-and-a-half").  As the label VP said when I barked about the cigar-and-martini imagery in the "Lid" video and how it was going to date us, "we'll cross that bridge when we get there."  

Unfortunately, by that time the bridge was on fire.

12

^ 11

Howdy, Tom

uncarved block.

Sat Jun 02, 2007 at 09:58:55 AM EST

5.00 (informative)

    Well, if I'm getting pranked, it's better to be fooled once in a while than be so suspicious that you never have fun. C'mon, it's the Net; we have a couple jokers here, and there's not exactly any way to verify-- so I'll just trust.

    So was it the band or the label that kept Katherine at such a low profile? She seems so terribly shy in most clips of the band (especially in that documentary), but you never can tell. As I said before, that would have really put the SNZ in a different category than anything that was being heard on the radio at the time . . yet when I would tell friends about you guys, and rave about her voice, the nearly universal reaction was, "there's a woman singer?"
    Applaud the fight against the "swing" pigeonhole, and for the record, always thought that Setzer was a hack. Well, maybe not a hack, but definitely a musician with rather narrow horizons. It all reminded me of fads past, the kind of thing that makes you chuckle ten or twenty years later.
    So was there a tussle between how guitar to add to the sound? From the outside (and very far outside, mind you) there seemed to be occasional moments when a song sounded as if the guitars were "dropped in"-- that the song would have worked just fine without them. Not that they made the song worse- I love the mix- but after ten listens, or twenty, you start hearing different things in a song. This wasn't so noticeable on The Inevitable, but on Hot and especially Perennial Favorites, the tendency really stands out, to my ears. Give me more time, and I'll try to pinpoint specific songs as examples.
    About that whole "asshole" thing: it's not as much of an epithet as it first appears, though you would have no way of knowing that, obviously. Every reporter worth a damn should be an asshole. Every politician I see is an asshole until shown otherwise-- and that rarely happens. Pro athletes, top level scientists, the leaders of successful bands . . if you need to get something done, need to overcome the inertia of everyday existence, you have to bring a lot of personality and force to bear, and for this isn't always easy for those around you. I look back on moments in my life and realize, "hey, that was a real asshole move", and then shrug and move on. I thought it was needed to get something done at the time, and doubtless I'll look back at "required" acts today with similar regret. No, when I really want to insult someone, the word is "incompetent", and that's something I'd never call anyone in the Zippers :)

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

13

^ 12

Re: Howdy, Tom

Tom Maxwell.

Sat Jun 02, 2007 at 11:16:36 AM EST

5.00 (interesting)

It's me, swear to god.  

Believe it or not, Katharine was never suppressed or minimized.  I wrote "Lid" for her, even taking the piss a little with that line about "grab your drinks and clear a space"--the idea that she would tear shit up was funny--and it was worked as the first single.  Didn't really go anywhere.  I think there's a clip on YouTube of the first "Lid" video which I directed, in which we break into a house and steal shit we like.  At the end, Katharine pours gas through the house and stands outside, lights a match, and blows it out.  MTV said "no go," probably because some idiot burned his house down after watching Beavis and Butthead.  No joke.  In my mind, it was all about us raiding the Sacred Jazz Museum.  The next video, which I had nothing to do with, was all swing iconography and shot on 35mm instead of 16, costing us 80 large.

I remember some label guy asking Katharine when she was going to do a solo record during our first west coast tour, summer of '95.  It pissed me off royally, as I was schlepping gear into the club when he said it, and I always considered us a band and didn't like being picked off or divvied up.  Later, of course, she did one, after telling the label that she would quit the band otherwise.  I found out about it when Bird let it slip on the phone.  Heartbreaking.  That record was what shut down the "Perennial" tour and hastened my departure.  Jimbo gave me a cassette of "Christmas Caravan" demos, and on the back was her solo record.  I couldn't decide if it was thoughtless oversight or "fuck you," as at first she denied even doing the record!

Anyway, after "Lid," "Hell" hit, unexpectedly.  KROQ played it as a joke, and it blew up.  Suddenly, I'm asked to be up front during the photo sessions.  I was thrilled, but uncomfortable.  I had entered the band as a drummer, and it was Jim and Katharine who asked me to sing.  I couldn't sing for shit, as any listening of "The Inevitable" will attest.  But that was back in the egalitarian days, and I got better.  I don't believe I actually sang a song well until "My Evergreen," otherwise known as "I'm outta here."  

When "Hell" hit, we were recording "Perennial," but the rot had started to set in.  I only gave Katharine one song to sing, "Kraken," which was out of her range.  She did a great job.  Don Raleigh had another, but it got shitcanned.  It's on a reel somewhere, unfinished.  After a year and a half, the label hired this hack to advise them on the next single, paid him way too much money, and he lobbied for "Trou Macacq."  I refused, because I thought another calypso would intimate that we were plowing the same ground, and there was enough tension because of my success already.  I purposefully mixed the song in that fucked-up way, with distorted vocals coming out of one channel.  I told the label that I'd pull the song from the record, because it was Jim or Katharine's turn, and they went with "Suits are Picking Up the Bill."  Flop-a-doodle.  Late, late in the day I assented to a"Trou" single, but by that time it was all over; late December '98.

Katharine was shy, or diffident, in turns.  She wouldn't do interviews, which made her that much more of a commodity, and seldom talked to fans.  She's certainly not ambitious, and felt she had little to say.  

As far as guitars go, not sure I understand.  There were three guitarists in the band--me, a solid rhythm player, Jimbo, a increasingly good soloist, and Kenny, Mr Clutch Man who could sound, in turns, like Les Paul, Django Reinhardt or Brian May.  We put shit down as we saw fit, I usually played an acoustic rhythm, Jimbo an electric lead through a little amp, or Ken.  Never talked about it much.  Somebody would introduce a new song, and people would gravitate towards what instrument they wanted to play, as well as their favorite refreshment.  Very little was dropped in, as "Hot" was recorded almost completely live, as was much of "Perennial."  You might be intimating that there's a little stylistic sore-thumbiness, but we believed authenticity was an emotional, not historical, consideration.  We always wanted our stuff to age well, and tried to make it so, but that judgment was never ours to make.

Call me anything you want.  I was a bit of an asshole back then, as much as I tried not to let it fuck with my head.  It's your blog, or posting, and I'm not gonna interfere.  I will say that I'm the only guy that will actually talk about the fucking band and not pull any punches.  Sometimes frankness can be considered inappropriate.

Been called worse, boss.

14

^ 13

Guitars And Vocals

uncarved block.

Sat Jun 02, 2007 at 08:31:16 PM EST

5.00 (interesting)

   OK, so I misheard something in the music. Sometimes a mix in sound comes from compromise, and sometimes from agreement; given the tension apparent in Perennial, I couldn't be sure, not having access to any previous takes or outtakes for comparison. If what you called "Zipperizing" was the result of compromise, then, it would have been one explanation- an artistic one at that- for why the train stopped so quickly. Other bands have succumbed to the solo album urge, and it seemed a good guess. But it was wrong.  
    As for the rot setting in, I have a personal anecdote that may depress you, but is telling nevertheless: the day I bought Perennial, I looked at the back of the CD and tried to guess which songs were duets, instrumentals, the guys or Katherine solo. I was right on every one. Getting in the groove, or getting in a rut? Sounds as if it was more the latter, after your comments here and elsewhere.
    If it makes you feel better, "Trou Macacq" is the best song I've ever heard about the difficulties of touring, walking that fine line between, "hey, this isn't as fun as it looks!" and "feel sorry for me!" Take Bob Seger's horrible, horrible "Turn The Page" (I really can't relate how much I hate that song)-- the parts of road life he pisses and moans about aren't exactly going to draw a lot of pity from factory workers or ditch diggers. (Gene Simmons says that he quit being a teacher and joined a band when he realized that nobody was going to stand up and cheer at the end of the day.) "Trou", OTOH, captures a more universal complaint, a realization that you've done your best, done your best, and in the end it wasn't good enough. Teacher, musician, athlete, scientist, anyone who puts forth an effort at something they've worked at can sympathize with such a sentiment. And "pine box derby" was a great turn of phrase!
    So was Je Widenhouse also pretty private, or was he just cut out of that documentary by the producers? The absence wasn't so notable the first time, but after the third time I watched it (doing research for this story), I really began to wonder what was up. Any input?
    If this doesn't get a reply, then thank you for your time, your kind words, and the information. Sorry to hear that you won't be working with Ken Mosher, and there's really no words that wouldn't sound empty coming from a stranger to say about your son's illness. Keep going as best you can.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

15

^ 14

Re: Guitars And Vocals

Tom Maxwell.

Sun Jun 03, 2007 at 11:01:38 AM EST

5.00 (interesting)

"Zipperizing" was almost a sacred term for me, as it involved very little discussion but an almost telepathic communication.  I usually came in with changes, melody, lyric and a head/out riff, but was always thrilled with what came out the other end of the "zipperizer;" parts and approaches that would never have occurred to me.  It was antithetical to compromise; it was pure collaboration.  One of the true pleasures of being in a band.

"Turn the Page."  Truly bad.  Not as opaque and shitty as "Blinded By the Light," but one of those excessive songs that made me want to play music that was more...direct.

I got to where I hated "Trou Macacq."  I was working on the song when we did "Hot."  It was a double-tone calypso, where "Hell" is a single-tone.  Don Raleigh had inadvertently invented "pine box derby" instead of "pine car derby" and we loved it.  For a long time it was the working title of what became the "Hot" record.  I still have early sequencing cassettes that are titled "Pine Box Derby."  I had a video idea for "Trou" in which we're in a Little Rascals-style race down a big hill.  Our cars are coffins, there's a lot of obvious back-projection, and one of the contestants is Death!  Anyway, I thought that calypso was like blues or whatever, that I could couch my more serious complaints in that form and write one for every record.  "Hell" put an end to that, and people said that "Trou" was a lame follow-up.  Also, the head riff wasn't as perfect as "Hell's."

It taught me something, though.  When Ken and I went to put some horns down on Ben Folds Five's "Reinhold Messner" record, they played us an early mix of "Redneck Past."  I knew it was a single, and told Robert and Darren.  They said that Ben was against it, and thought it was too much of a novelty.  I said "don't put any song on a record that you don't want to become a single."  They didn't go with it, though.  Shame.  It's brilliant.  I knew that, after "Hell," "Trou" was the worst possible single idea, for every reason.  It played perfectly into that stultifying industry idea of repeating the formula.  I guess that's okay if the follow-up is titled "Oops, I did it again!"

Je was, and is, a company man.  (And a beautiful guy.)  Though he, like Stu, signed the partnership agreement, they never acted like peers as much as Jimbo's sidemen.  That was the break for me: I always felt like it was "our" band, and Jim and Katharine felt it was theirs.  So goes the world.  Je was not into collective self-determination.  He wanted a gig.

My son is well, and I appreciate your sympathy.  He kicked that stuff in November, and is about to enter a lengthy, albeit low-intensity, maintenance phase.  He'll go back to school.  It's been very hard, sometimes almost brutal.  With this stuff, the prognosis is great and the treatment's a bitch.  But I wish I could tell you how incredible he is; how loving, how resilient.  This process brought me to my own motto: relentlessly loving, and lovingly relentless.

I appreciate the opportunity to communicate.  Once, and Ken and I played a show in which we performed the songs we wrote in Zippers, a local blogger called us "dicks" for doing it!  It's not so much that I want to control how I'm perceived, but rather I'd like that perception to be well-informed.

Lastly, I only want to say that, in my opinion, the Zippers' "reunion" is artistically bankrupt.  They're playing songs that Ken and I wrote (we were responsible for half the "Hot" record), and even using our likenesses in promotion.  It's a bait and switch.  I knew what it meant when I quit the band, but it's wrong for the line-up that only toured for a month the following year to represent themselves as the group we were in for five years.  Not to mention Don Raleigh.  I'm well aware of the goodwill associated with the brand and know that people will take me as a whiner.  I just have a long-held belief that corpses should remain buried.

Three years ago I wrote a song called "It's the Money," and the bridge lyrics are:

What buys you time to daydream
Then makes you blow it all on magic beans?
What kills the patient when you find the cure
Then brings him back for the reunion tour?

...It's the money  
It's all about the money

This story: 15 comments (3 from subqueue)
Post a Comment