Business

One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Rent A Picketer.

MayorBob.

Posted to Business on Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 07:25:05 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

They can be seen all over the District of Columbia -- picketers marching with posters outside buildings employing non-union labor.  They'll be chanting slogans like: "What do we want?  Fair wages.  When do we want them?  Now."  But, if you approach them and ask them individually about the issues underlying the sloganeering you're likely to not get much of answer.  That's because many of the picketers in the line don't belong to the union they're protesting for.  For many of them this is their sole source of income, because normally they're homeless and jobless.

Often as not, these "temporary workers" are being paid to walk the picket lines set up by the local chapter of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters (UBC).  They are rounded up out of homeless shelters and paid (US)$8 an hour to voice the union's protest about low-wage, nonunion workers employed on the site.  But the local in DC isn't the only UBC local which uses non-members to voice their protest.  UBC-affiliated locals all over the country employ the same tactic for their picket lines.  "A shift in the paradigm" of picketing is how one UBC spokesperson in Kentucky described the strategy.

The reason you will find nonmembers working in these "area standards campaigns" (as one leader put it) is that the regular members are gainfully employed at well paid jobs elsewhere.  Occasionally, other labor unions will criticize the strategy, saying it "wouldn't create a very positive impression on me, nor would it create a very sympathetic position."  But, for the most part, the rest of organized labor isn't about to pick a fight with the UBC over it.  A spokesperson for the AFL-CIO says there's a difference between what the UBC is using the homeless for - "informational picketing" - and picket lines set up for strikes and boycotts.  The UBC belongs to a coalition of seven unions which broke away from the AFL-CIO in 2005 partially in protest to what it saw as a lack of aggressiveness in trying to organize workers.  John Boardman, an official with UNITE HERE says, "let's focus on the message -- that there are people in this building that are working for substandard wages and benefits."

Other critics point out that, although the homeless picketers are paid above minimum wage, they receive no benefits.  They see it as undercutting a principle organized labor has struggled a long time to establish.  Others view it as a sign of the times and the labor movement using lemons they have been handed to turn into lemonade - in an age of declining union membership, use nonmembers to help organize the movement.  Some homeless advocates criticize the strategy also.  Ingrid Reed coordinates job placement and housing at the 1350-bed Federal City Shelter (the largest and most comprehensive facility of its kind in America).  Reed says the union should be offering the homeless apprenticeship programs rather than picketing pay: "These jobs won't pay the rent.  If they're out there every day Monday through Friday, when are they looking for a job?"  But one picketer, a resident at a woman's shelter said she's appreciative for the work:

"It's about the cash.  We're against low wages, but I'm here for the cash."

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, labor union, picketing, homeless, work (all tags)

This story: 6 comments (5 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
6

Re: One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Re

zyxwvutsr.

Sat Jul 28, 2007 at 12:35:20 PM EST

3.00 (interesting)

I've had to deal with unions due to the business I am in. At first the behavior of unions puzzled me a bit, but then I had an epiphany and everything they did made sense from then on.

First, labor unions are businesses. Unions go after market share in more or less the same manner as other businesses. Sometimes they try to expand the market and sometimes they are content merely to steal business from their competitors, i.e., other unions. Unions have marketing plans and growth projections, a sales force, R&D, account reps, customer service, and all the other accouterments of the corporate world. The ultimate goal of unions is to maximize profit, not to maximize the rights and of workers or the quality of working conditions.

Second, to a much greater extent than one would expect to see in traditional businesses, the management of unions run their businesses for their own benefit rather than the benefit of the investors. (You may be under the mistaken impression that the union members are the investors, but that is incorrect. The rank and file union members are customers; the investors are union officials from shop steward on up. In this respect unions are businesses in the Amway model - basically pyramid schemes. But even in pyramid schemes the small players have the believe that they truly are stakeholders, and that's what shop stewards truly believe. The shop stewards and middle managers who thrive in unions are not the idealistic types who believe in equality and justice for all - rather it is the selfish and/or self-important who thrive, rabble-rousers who love to feel like a big shot and love to think they wield some degree of power over the employers.) This is because the investors in unions are not nearly as sophisticated as investors in for-profit firms.

Third, union profits go to the shareholders, same as in any business, but the method of distribution is markedly different. Gross margins in union operations are income (from dues) minus legitimate operating expenses. Legitimate operating expenses are the unions' member funds (medical, disability, legal, etc.), mundane operating expenses such as office space, market-rate salaries, and benefits for the union employees. There really aren't any net profits in the traditional sense, but there are perquisites for the investors who are low on the totem pole, and senior management lives very, very well.

1

Re: One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Re

rombuu.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 10:12:13 AM EST

none

Yet another reason to cheer the demise of unions and the labor movement.

4

^ 1

Re: One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Re

thefadd.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 02:16:04 PM EST

none

As a lifelong union advocate, I'm beginning to agree with you on the demise of the unions bit. The system does need to fundamentally change. A lot of unions have become bloated and don't serve their constituency. As more companies become increasingly worker friendly and our economy becomes more of an independent contractor, service dominated system, the relationship between employer and employee grows increasingly less adversarial and one-directional. Of course there are certain jobs that are still done in America on a mass scale where worker representation makes sense. If unions want survive in that capacity, however, they'll need to adjust to the market demands for their services, just like the labor they represent. The baseball umpires union was long seen as the most powerful union in the country. But they became a great example of the bloated and out of touch nature of many union leaderships and squandered a great deal of the power the wielded. The NFL player's union is actually a great high profile example of a union that has adapted. Despite the criticism for capitulating to and having too cozy a relationship with management, their last deals have been judged hands down wins for labor while many other unions have not been able to position themselves so well. Their willingness to work management has led directly to the unprecedented success that both labor and management are currently enjoying.

If you want to see the demise of the "labor movement" keep dreaming. So long as people work, they'll demand to get paid every once in awhile.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

2

Re: One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Re

pO157.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 10:46:45 AM EST

none

Informational picketing?! Once again, it's story time: I walked downtown last summer and there were members of the police/government employees union protesting some politicos campaign announcement outside the city building. A member of my group asked the guy why they disliked him, as their signs were mostly expressing generalized disagreement and anger and no specific grievances. Mr. Cool Protester Man turned and said "Well, some poeple like this guy [the candidate] and others don't. But it really doesn't matter, because you don't have anything to do with it and I don't want to explain it all anyway." Of course, this didn't exactly help his cause.

Now, replace the uninformed angry government worker above with random homeless shelter resident, and I am sure that anybody they talk to will see through this whole ploy. I'll bet you that if they keep doing this a lot the press will get wind and put one of the homeless on camera and ask them to explain the union position and why they are protesting. Now THAT would be comedy gold.

3

^ 2

Give me a break!

Lou.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 12:12:42 PM EST

none

I'm surprised John Stossel hasn't already jumped on this.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

5

^ 2

Re: One Labor Union's New Approach To Protest - Re

MayorBob.

Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 04:09:11 PM EST

none

My reaction to the bit about how the paid picketers won't know enough about the issues to answer questions put to them was to wonder how often do picketers get approached by passers by asking what the picket line is all about?  I know I've passed any number of picket lines in my life and I bet you I haven't asked a single person on the line what they're protesting about.  Usually the signs they're carrying give me enough info to pass on by without asking.  I'd be willing to bet that most of the real union members on a picket line figure anyone who approaches the line isn't doing so to voice their support, thus maybe that explains the obnoxious reply your associate got.  He certainly didn't win any friends of supporters but maybe he was just pissed having to march around all day long with a poster.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

This story: 6 comments (5 from subqueue)
Post a Comment