Legal

Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

pO157.

Posted to Legal on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 09:23:28 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

In August, 2004 Mark O'Hara was picked up by Tampa Airport police after being found with 58 Vicodin pills and a small quantity of marijuana inside the bread truck he owned. He was soon sent to prison for 25 years for drug trafficking and lost everything. The twist in this case? Prosecutors admit he was not selling the drugs and the Vicodin was prescribed to him legally by his physician.

Mr. O'Hara evidently overcame a trip to prison in the late 1980s and early 1990s to build himself a successful baking business, own two condos, and cars. However, all of that slipped away after his 2004 arrest for having the Vicodin and marijuana in his company truck at the airport. Surprisingly, he was not charged with just marijuana possession, but also drug trafficking (Greater than 28G but less than 30 KGs) for the Vicadin which he was prescribed by his doctors for almost two decades after a series of unfortunate car wrecks.

He plead guilty to holding the marijuana -- leading to 67 days in jail. But, at trial on the remaining charges the prosecutors insinuated that he "doctor shopped" or used multiple doctors to get his hands on narcotics. They admitted he did not try to sell the drugs but charged him with trafficking due to the quantity of pills he had on him. However, they also objected when the defense attorneys attempted to get the judge to include in the jury instructions a note stating that having a prescription allows the possession of those drugs. Prosecutors argued that such an instruction would not be allowable because Florida law does not accept a "prescription defense" in drug cases. That instruction never made it to the jury and Mr. O'Hara was convicted, sending him to prison for a mandatory 25 years based on the quantity of pills he had. Later the jury foreman, Frank Brigliadora, stated the outcome would have been different if they would have known it was legal to posses drugs if you had a prescription.

Suddenly Mr. O'Hara's fortunes changed. An appeals court called the Prosecution's reasoning "absurd" and "ridiculous" because it would make all patients criminals once they left the drug store. He was rapidly transported by himself (a luxury usually never given to jail inmates) back to a county facility and appeared in front of the original trial judge the next morning.

All of this transpired so quickly that his lawyers were not even originally informed of the hearing. Mr. O'Hara was quickly released from jail with all of his worldly possessions in hand wearing a paper "clown suit" because he did not even own clothes (everything was sold to pay for the appeal, although once liquidated his assets were then seized as drug fine money). He was left penniless to make the 25 mile trip back to his hometown.

Luckily, Mr. O'Hara was helped by the prison warden, Col. David Parrish, who found him in the parking lot and arranged a taxi for his trip home, gave him $60 and an apology for his treatment.

In the interim attorneys with the Florida State Attorney's Office will review the file and decide whether or not to refile charges.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, Mark O'Hara, Col. David Parrish, drugs, drug war, mandatory minimums, marijuana, Vicadin, addiction, Tampa, Florida (all tags)

This story: 8 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Re: Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

nmiguy.

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 01:44:21 PM EST

none

Re-file charges?  Haven't they fucked this up enough?  Geesh.  The guy legally had a prescription for pain killers and they want to send him to prison for years?  

Over-zealous prosecutors are fucking up the country here.  

2

^ 1

Re: Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

pO157.

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 02:43:50 PM EST

none

I do not believe they plan on refiling charges. They won't.

What is probably going on is the DA realized, "Holy Shit, we screwed the pooch on this one and I look like a jerk." But, if he admitted in court immediately he was going to drop the charges and apologize he would admit they made an idiotic move to begin with and likely messed with this guy for little reason.

However, if he goes the "slow contemplative" route and acts as if they are considering pressing forward with the case it promotes the fallacy that there actually is a case to bring. Then, when the coverage has died down (and it will) they will quietly let Mr. O'Hara get on with his life, without apology and without compensation, but saving face and preserving the DA's chances for re-election.

5

^ 2

Re: Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

nmiguy.

Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 01:08:45 PM EST

none

How exactly does it "save face" when he is slowly contemplating charges when he has nothing, he's already fucked over this guy, and pretends there's still a case, further damaging this man's reputation?  

Go the route of Nifong, drag this DA out and expose him. Make him accountable for this screw up, and the "slow contemplation" he uses to try and cover his sorry power abusing ass.

When having a prescription is a crime, we're all criminals.  

6

^ 5

Re: Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

WMK.

Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 01:51:30 PM EST

none

I'd be happy seeing this DA 'nilfonged' for being a prick who is more interested in screwing over anyone he has the power to screw than advancing the cause of justice in his state (his job).  He sullies the image of the state of Florida.  The people of any State deserve much better than a man who would screw up like this and waste their time and money pursuing ridiculous cases.

Or Florida could keep this guy around and maintain their image as a swamp of pernicious injustice, bizarre scandals, and rank stupidity.

 

"...when theft and high crime becomes obscenely obvious to even the blindest beer sucking idiot, it is always the Republicans who are in office." -- Joe Bageant

7

^ 5

Re: Tale of Woe: The Mark O'Hara Story

pO157.

Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 04:02:12 PM EST

none

I was not defending the DA who brought this case (or who is still prosecuting it, if they are two separate people -- hell, for all we know this could have gotten tossed to some random guy out of law school after everybody in the office realizes they fucked up but still need to send somebody in to court to take the blame). I, too, think he is a moron.

However, I believe the DA thinks by appearing to ponder this over slowly and deliberately (while leaving the guy twisting in the wind, but I am sure they never think about the people they fuck over) it would look better for their office than by simply standing up and doing the right thing at his bail hearing in front of the press.

Whoever pressed this case in the first place (save the misdemeanor marijuana charge) is an idiot. Whoever is continuing it now is also an idiot, although less of one if they drop it soon.

3

Hey, same state!

Lou.

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 06:23:17 PM EST

none

O'hara was busted in the same state as Rush Limbaugh.  I wonder how Rush is doing these days?

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

4

^ 3

Re: Hey, same state!

thefadd.

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 10:50:26 PM EST

1.00 (funny)

I just read where he's endorsing GM's line of green vehicles.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

8

This Is Why

thefadd.

Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 05:16:29 PM EST

none

If I were on a jury, I would never find anyone guilty for a drug offense. Such abuses of authority are too common within a system that criminalizes even the safest of recreational pursuits.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

This story: 8 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment