. . makes those weekends at the Jersey shore or weeklong vacations at domestic getaways like the Catskill resorts or the Greenbrier hotel look dull and boring.
This makes me wonder to what degree the US has itself gotten a bit more boring, or at least is perceived that way by its citizens. The high point of domestic travel for entertainment started between the two world wars, with the affordable motor home, and continued well until . . well, it hasn't necessarily stopped, at least if you're in a town like Tucson (as I am) where hordes of mobile homes of all stripes come to winter.
Be that as it may, I wonder if there's just less variety to see as you travel around the nation. An easy place to pin the blame would be mass consumer culture; when the same roadside restaurants are in every state, there's a certain monotony to the terrain. Throw in similar styles nationally for new developments- how much variety is there in strip malls, really?- and there's not a whole lot to leave home for.
Television can't be ignored, as at least some regional differences recede when everyone's watching Law and Order or American Idol. A more benign factor might be travel shows that highlight foreign locales, or only the most notable domestic ones. (Tourism in the Pacific northwest is pretty brisk, as is Alaska and, of course, Hawaii.) While there's always been an element of this*, television makes the perception more intense than words or photos ever could. How does the Oregon coast rate in contrast to the Irish or Scottish beaches? Hell if I know (I do rather like that stretch of land), but I do know that I'm ten times (at least) more likely to see the latter in a film or on a TV show. Eventually, the cost might even be irrelevant-- even if the domestic trip was cheaper, it might feel like "wasted money" if you could afford to travel abroad.
Or maybe I should just go reread Blue Highways and reconsider this line of thought :)
*Paul Fussell has written a couple essays about travel guides, and the business of travel guides. IIRC, there's a good one in Thank God For The Atom Bomb. There's a good chapter in a great book (Wartime) about the travel bug that bit Britons very hard after WWII, or at least the ones who could afford it.
Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras
5
4
|
Re: Nostalgia? You Decide
Thu Sep 27, 2007 at 10:23:56 PM EST
|
Or maybe I should just go reread Blue Highways...
May I suggest
River Horse instead?
6
5
|
Heh
Thu Sep 27, 2007 at 10:51:21 PM EST
|
Yeah. Rethinking that line, I realize now how rhetorical was that statement. You'd think working in a book store would whet the appetite of a life time reader, but man, a lot of days the last thing I want to do after work is crack open a book. I'm stockpiling good books, and reading one or two (the history The Mirror is fairly good, at least for the first half) as I go. I'll give River Horse a look when I have a few moments at work, and see if it grabs me like I remember Blue Highways doing.
And lest I sound too incurious: the store inventory has no data base of any kind, yet the book staff is expected to know what we have well enough to know what to buy from customers, as 97% of the merchandise comes from trading. Carrying around 300,000 titles in your head- or at least trying- is fairly exhausting mentally. (Sci-Fi alone is 10,000 books and about 6,000 titles, for example.) And it gets worse, but I won't bore you with the details. It's a good job, and lots of folks have way worse jobs, but the reality is turning out to be less appealing than old daydreams.
Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras