Legal

A Quarter-pounder of a Tragedy

gerrymander.

Posted to Legal on Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:15:18 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

After decades of silence, and in a story sure to please no one, two men have come forward with evidence of a murder --the lack of which kept an innocent man behind bars for 25 years.

We've grown accustomed to simple stories, like "prosecutorial misconduct has imprisoned the innocent," "the defense always works to bring justice to the poor," and "torture is never justified." But sometimes we learn a story which isn't so simple.

This story begins in January, 1982, when two McDonald's security guards were shot, one fatally. A month later, Edgar Hope was arrested following a gunfight where a police officer was killed. Hope led the police to Alton Logan, who was charged with the armed robbery of the McDonald's guards and convicted to life in prison.

Shortly after Logan's arrest, another pair of police officers were killed. Two perpetrators, brothers Andrew and Jackie Wilson, were arrested, and police obtained Andrew WIlson's confession for this third set of murders after 15 hours of torture and interrogation. Wilson told the tale of the abuse he received to Dale Coventry and Jamie Kunz, the public defenders assigned to his case. That testimony would later be the keystone in a wide-ranging investigation of abuse by the Chicago Police Department.

But reports of torture were not the only things Wilson told his legal defense team. He also confessed, under the umbrella of attorney-client privilege, to being the gunman in the January McDonald's murder, laughing that someone else was taking the rap. Coventry and Kunz were troubled enough by this to have versions of Wilson's confession signed, witnessed and notarized, then sealed. They remained silent about the confession throughout Wilson's torture lawsuit and eventual $1 million award. Only now, after Wilson's death of natural causes, have they stepped forward with the truth.

So, to recap: We have an innocent man kept in prison with the assistance of public defenders, who chose to respect a murderer's integrity over his. We have a police force indicted, and two officers fired, for only beating a guilty man enough to confess one of his crimes, rather than all of them. And, we have the murderer who lived out his life a wealthy man (if in prison), in no small part for having been soulless enough to allow an innocent serve time for him.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by gerrymander, murder, cover-up (all tags)

This story: 5 comments (3 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
5

Re: A Quarter-pounder of a Tragedy

DEMachina.

Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 04:44:21 PM EST

5.00 (astute, astute)

...who chose to respect a murderer's integrity over his.

Give me a break.  This is what lawyers are required to do.  If the public defenders had talked, they would have been disbarred.  And there's a reason for this: the entire legal system is completely anchored on a) lawyers being able to trust each other, and b) clients being able to trust their lawyers.  If people believe that what they tell their lawyers could end up being used against them in court, people will hide a lot of details, and lawyers won't be able to do their jobs.  The whole system would go completely to hell.

Ironically, this silence is the only reason the truth ever came out: do you really think Wilson would have told his lawyers the truth if he knew it would come back to haunt him?

Q: What do you think of western civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.

1

Re: A Quarter-pounder of a Tragedy

skeeter1.

Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 09:51:23 AM EST

2.50 (informative)

I'm really not surprised.  I've been to Chicago many times, and I'm a resident near Cleveland.  I don't trust big-city cops farther than I can spit.  Small wonder why people pick up and move into the suburbs.  It's only a temporary solution, though.  My own suburb has had a lot of crap going on lately.  If I wanted to be "safe", I think I'd have to move to the north woods of Canada.  

there's only one way to find out...

2

^ 1

Yeah but

Lou.

Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 11:44:38 AM EST

4.00 (funny, funny)

If I wanted to be "safe", I think I'd have to move to the north woods of Canada.    

What about bears?  Oh wait...I forgot.  You're armed to the teeth.

Carry on.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

3

^ 2

Re: Yeah but

skeeter1.

Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 12:56:27 PM EST

4.00 (informative)

"Oh wait...I forgot.  You're armed to the teeth."

Let me see.  Last time I looked, I have several .22s, a 9mm, a .38Spl, a .357Mag, and a couple of 12-gauge shotties.  Yes, I'd be well equipped to deal with the bears.  LOL!

there's only one way to find out...

4

^ 3

Re: Yeah but

PenitenziAgite.

Tue Jan 22, 2008 at 01:42:34 PM EST

4.00 (astute)

You better have some slug loads for your shotgun.  You can shoot a .22 or any of those pistol loads into a bear all day and do nothing but piss it off.

sierra tango foxtrot uniform

This story: 5 comments (3 from subqueue)
Post a Comment