Your Right To Your Privacy Info Ends At A Government File
MayorBob.
Posted to Legal on Sun Jan 06, 2008 at 07:39:54 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.
"This is frightening. You know, a Social Security number is really the fingerprint to somebody's identification." - Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler
When Attorney General Gansler found his Social Security account number was posted on a web site maintained by the state he works for, he reacted with horror and shock. Perhaps he shouldn't have been so shocked. After all, it turns out that Gansler is hardly alone. In fact, millions of his fellow citizens' "fingerprint accounts" are out there, openly posted on the internet -- most of them located on government web sites.
When Social Security Numbers (SSN) were first issued by the federal government in 1936, they were intended "to track individuals' accounts within the Social Security program." Over time, they have become de facto national identification numbers. As a matter of course, as soon as a child is born in the US, an application for an SSN is sent to the federal government. Virtually every transaction you perform in the US requires a valid SSN. However, as an outgrowth of the Privacy Act, government has been required to safeguard information retained on individual citizens. SSN information has been considered restricted since 2000, meaning government is not supposed to post SSNs openly in any of their files.
But, as Attorney General Gansler found out, there's a ton of information containing SSNs in files stored prior to 2000. And there's the occasional piece of SSN information that gets mistakenly posted even to this day. All of this brings us to the serious issue of identity theft, a crime perpetrated upon 8.3 million Americans (pdf doc) in 2005. It's a crime facilitated by public posting of SSNs. The main problem is in the millions of documents with SSNs which were filed by the government prior to 2000. They are definitely not covered by the prohibitions and, according to those in charge of the files, redacting SSN information would be "just plain nutty."
But, even in those files created subsequent to 2000, there are all sorts of documents with SSN information attached which inadvertently get placed in public files. Things like arrest warrants, summonses, land and property transactions, as well as business transactions with SSNs openly posted will be included in other files which may have had the SSNs redacted. Maryland state Senator Jamie Raskin (D - Montgomery) expressed his alarm at the situation, "the government should be setting the example in really trying to protect people's private information ... there's a whole criminal underground now that thrives on stealing people's credit cards and usurping their identity for as long as they can." The Virginia Watchdog web site keeps tabs on SSN information being openly stored in public records. It reported that former NFL quarterback Troy Aikman's SSN information is accessible through a Texas government web site. Aikman was hardly the only fairly public figure to find out their privacy information is more public than they thought. Colin Powell and his wife (pdf doc) were also. As were Jeb Bush and his wife (pdf doc). In Maryland, Sen. Raskin plans on drawing up legislation giving Maryland residents the right to demand that their SSNs be redacted, no matter when the record on which it appears was created. According to Raskin, the public has a right "to know who owns a particular property" but not the SSN of the owner.
< New Hampshire Debate Primary Relatively Real Time Discussion
Crazy Enough To Kill? Yes. Crazy Enough To Collect An Inheritance? Maybe. >
