Sport

The `Rocket' Responds - Claims Of The Needle And The Damage Done

MayorBob.

Posted to Sport on Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 06:35:12 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

No sooner did the Mitchell Report (pdf doc) get released than one name on the report reacted viscerally.  "I never used performance enhancers" was the cry from the heart denial of major league pitching great Roger Clemens.  Thus began the campaign to counter the allegations of juicing made by his former trainer, Brian McNamee.  It was a campaign which culminated within the past two days with an interview on 60 Minutes, which raised as many questions as it settled, and in the filing of a lawsuit against McNamee.

By the time Clemens sat down to discuss matters with Mike Wallace a couple of things happened:

  • Clemens clarified his earlier statement which seemed to imply he had remained needle-free his entire career.  He admitted McNamee had injected him, but not with performance enhancers.  Left unclarified was the reason for taking two weeks to deliver the clarification.

  • Clemens saw his commercial potential begin to show signs of drying up fast by sponsors nervous that Clemens might have juiced.

  • Clemens began hearing the buzz that his once sure-fire induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame might become problematic over the controversy.

  •  McNamee let it be known if Clemens called him a liar on 60 Minutes, Clemens could expect to be sued for defamation of character.

    As it stands right now, Clemens is denying that there was anything more than vitamins or lidocaine in those shots McNamee gave him.  In his complaint, Clemens accuses McNamee of making false claims about Clemens "with actual malice, knowing they were false.  The complaint alleges that McNamee "fabricated" the claims as a way of keeping himself from going to prison.  According to Clemens' lawyer Rusty Hardin "this has ruined Roger's reputation with a large percentage of the public."  Therefore, the pitcher believed a good offense is the best defense and struck at McNamee first.

    The court battle between McNamee and Clemens will, of course, take time to run its course.  However, the American public (at least those who tuned into 60 Minutes) had the opportunity to judge Clemens' most public denial.  And the judgment, from those who are paid to watch these sorts of things - he sure doesn't look like he's coming clean with himself, much less America.  One sportswriter offered his opinion about the one thing which might clear Clemens' name - that he be proven absolutely innocent.  However, another sportswriter offers his opinion why Clemens shouldn't expect to get the benefit of the doubt.  What do you think?

  • Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, Roger Clemens, performance enhancing drugs, MLB, 60 Minutes, lawsuit, Baseball Hall of Fame (all tags)

    This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
    Post a Comment
    6

    short takes

    wetkarma.

    Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 08:05:05 AM EST

    5.00 (astute)

    I don't really follow sports and my perspective on drug use in sports is that athletes already do weird things to their bodies in the name of competition, I have no problem with them shooting up to enhance performance.

    That said I'm having a hard time understanding how Clemens is 'innocent' as he claims. For Clemens position to be true, McNamee would have to be lying - but whats his incentive for lying? You go to jail for perjury just as much as for failing to disclose information completely..so what take the perjury risk? The only way perjury makes sense is if the government solicited it..this spins off into conspiracy theory land.

    On a separate tack -- in the future (i.e. within the next 15 years) a new generation of kid athletes will be born whose gene lines will be modified to enhanced performance. The idea that using steroids will kill sports is going to seem quaint by 2030.

    Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

    7

    ^ 6

    Re: short takes

    Shy Elf.

    Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 12:34:38 AM EST

    4.00 (interesting)

    One thing MaNamee makes clear is that Clemens was clean until after he had already established his reputation as one of the all-time great pitchers and was on the downside of his career.  What performance-enhancing drugs allowed him to do was to extend the peak of his career, not to improve on his best years.  This contrasts sharply with, say, Mark McGuire who would have been forgotten without steroids.

    1

    First Thing Out Of The Box.

    MayorBob.

    Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 08:39:57 AM EST

    4.00 (interesting)

    Clemens said he would testify before Congress.  But, if what transpired yesterday is a prelude to his performance in Washington, he might want to just save himself the cost of airline tickets.  Clemens and his lawyers called a press conference which was supposed to clear his name.  It turned out to be what the folks over at fark.com call a MASSIVE FAIL.

    It started with Clemens playing a 17 minute tape recording of a phone call between the Rocket and McNamee.  Clemens' lawyer Rusty Hardin asked the assembled media to "listen very hard."  This is what they heard:

    1. An obviously anguished McNamee, hurt and contrite for having outed Clemens, offering to do "whatever it takes" to make it up to him.

    2. An oddly distant Clemens failing to ask McNamee to come forward and refute what he told George Mitchell.  "Tell them you lied and I never did roids" would have been a nice touch.

    3. The words steroids or HGH never came up in the taped recording.

    4. McNamee never said his anguish had anything to do with having lied about Clemens or the injections he claimed he gave him.  In fact, the phone call was engendered by McNamee's son, who is gravely ill with an autoimmune disease.  The son idolizes Clemens and is upset about the blowup over what his dad said to Mitchell and got reported in the media.

    The fact that Clemens and his legal team decided the time was ripe to a). tape the call, and b). play it for a news conference, is IMHO despicable.  It's despicable because it dragged a completely innocent third party into this whole thing (McNamee's son).  If anything, Clemens comes off looking like a cold, calculating cretin who will do anything and use anyone to further his cause.

    The tape playing was followed by questions from the media.  Stop, make that a couple of questions from the media that Roger obviously didn't like.  He barked at a few reporters, failing to answer anything they asked him, and stormed out of the session early.

    Illegitimi non carborundum.

    3

    ^ 1

    Re: First Thing Out Of The Box.

    delete me.

    Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 10:58:10 AM EST

    3.00 (interesting)

    It's been noted by Clemens' lawyer that recording the conversation is legal by Texas and New York's rules: Only one party has to consent. But seeing as the phone call crossed state borders, would there be a federal guideline on wiretap/recordings?

    - derumi (del-me)
    "Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

    5

    ^ 3

    Re: First Thing Out Of The Box.

    Shy Elf.

    Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 06:03:52 PM EST

    5.00 (informative)

    The federal statue says that if it's legal in both states it's legal.

    2

    Re: The `Rocket' Responds - Claims Of The Needle A

    delete me.

    Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 10:55:50 AM EST

    4.00 (interesting)

    Supposedly the phone conversation was initiated by Roger's former trainer, but it sounded like a fishing expedition on Roger's part to me.

    This has been recounted on talk radio multiple times, but if it was me, I wouldn't have been so calm. I would have been furious and making demands. Of course, this presumes that I was innocent of using HGH and steroids. I can't even begin to fathom why baseball's ridiculous "unwritten rules" would preclude players from talking to Mitchell about who's not cheating.

    - derumi (del-me)
    "Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

    4

    ^ 2

    The Subtext Of It All

    thefadd.

    Tue Jan 08, 2008 at 02:35:43 PM EST

    4.00 (interesting)

    Baseball, far and away, is long known as the sport most known for its machismo and its unwritten codes. This likely stems from both it's age and the fact that it's players for the most part are not as smart as those of other sports. It doesn't shock me at all that players feel like they can't talk. Look only at what happened to Jason Grimsley and Jose Canseco. Tons of guys have done steroids. Those two talked about and became immediate and complete out casts. It's a fraternity that starts on the field and extends up and down the executive suits. Beyond everything else, that code is the problem.

    The trainer said a few key things here. He said (and I paraphrase) "Roger took steroids during July and August and it doesn't do anything diminish how hard he worked." Then he also said (and again I paraphrase) "I wanted to tell the truth and the truth is Roger didn't take as much as other guys." My take on this is that the trainer sees the writing on the wall with Roger taking the fall because he's been named and he's a big name. But he doesn't see that as right because while Roger did it, he's going to be disproportionately punished by the media (in the trainer's eye). So, to tell the "truth" is really to lie.

    Clemens and his attorney are coming at this from a completely different angle that easily easily elucidated when Clemens yells, "You think I give a damn about the Hall of Fame" at the press conference. Clemens and his attorney don't give a damn about the press. They understand this is strict legal issue and Clemens will toe the line as close as he can to protect himself without getting in any criminal trouble. The press has never appreciated anyone taking into account legal reasoning into their actions because most of the press is too lazy to understand legal issues but more importantly, thinks it can act as judge and jury above any court.

    The taped phone conversation is an obvious going-out-of-his-way act by Clemens to demonstrate that he is following the letter of the law. Of course he didn't get upset. He knew he was taping the conversation and wanted to appear cool and rational. "Tell the truth. Tell the truth," he keeps repeating. "Hey look federal prosecutors, I'm a good guy not obstructing anything a la Barry Bonds," he's really saying, all the while knowing his trainer will understand the subtext.

    It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

    This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
    Post a Comment