Sport

In a surprise victory, Giants take the Super Bowl!

pO157.

Posted to Sport on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:39:27 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Ladies and gentlemen, I have been to the Great Wall of China, I have seen the Pyramids of Egypt, I've even witnessed a grown man satisfy a camel. But never in all my years as a sportscaster have I witnessed something as improbable, as impossible, as what we've witnessed here today!

Giants head coach Tom Coughlin, who as recently as last season was fighting for his job now has a secure position. In an amazing game brought to you by the stellar defensive plays of the New York Giants, the undefeated Patriots found themselves vanquished and lost their date with destiny. The 13 point underdogs pulled it out in the final seconds of the 4th quarter to take a 3 point lead and win the game, the Lombardi Trophy, and their spot in history as a Cinderella story wild card team who made a most improbable finish in one of the most memorable Super Bowls in recent history.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, Super Bowl, football, NFL (all tags)

This story: 36 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
4

My beloved Dolphins

Lou.

Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 10:37:34 PM EST

5.00 (brilliant, brilliant)

They still hold a place in my heart.

Suck on that, Pats.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

30

^ 4

Re: My beloved Dolphins

thefadd.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:26:12 PM EST

5.00 (funny, interesting)

I'm sure most people missed it since it was on the NFL Network and well after the game was over but they ran a little interstitial with all the '72 Dolphins hanging out in a front yard. They're doing little things like grilling and practicing their putting. Everything they say to each other is, "That was perfect," "That steak smells perfect," and "Perfect putt." Then, a courier truck with "Giants" on the side rolls up and hands them a gift wrapped package of Perfection: Population 1.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

24

^ 4

Most Dominant Team Ever?

Shy Elf.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:46:59 AM EST

4.50 (interesting, interesting)

Teams have been gradually getting better with increases in population, improvements in training techniques and improvements in performance-enhancing drugs.  If you ask which team is the best ever, it probably was the Patriots this year.

If you ask the more relevant question of which team was the most dominant ever, my pick is the '85 Bears, who while scoring 91 points and giving up only 10 in the playoffs, finished the season with only 3 games with results of a 7 point win or worse, compared with 5 for New England and 6 for the '72 Dolphins.

Dan Marino gets my pick for the best quarterback ever, in significant part for dismantling the '85 Bears with timing-pattern short passes even as offensive line was being shredded.

The Patriots are clearly the better team, but anything can happen in a single game, and the Giants were significantly underrated due to their -10 turnover ratio during the regular season.  Since turnovers are mostly luck, a team with a negative turnover ratio is generally better than its record would otherwise indicate, and teams with a negative turnover ratio are now 6-4 in the Super Bowl.

The most impressive performance of the game was Ahmad Bradshaw neutralizing the advantage of the New England defense by dragging them for a 5.0 yard average.

Where the Giants really won the game was with their platoon defensive line.  The Giants carry 13 players at the defensive line position on their roster vs. only 7 for the Patriots.  By continually substituting players, they were able to keep their defensive line fresher and faster than the offensive line of the Patriots.

29

^ 24

Re: Most Dominant Team Ever?

thefadd.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:11:25 PM EST

5.00 (interesting, interesting)

I dunno, they say those 70's Steelers were on the juice, too. When I compare all time teams, I use the "dominant in their time" scale, too. I tend to disallow the "better training today" meme in my thinking because I think of the comparison as allowing the teams from back then, the chance to train in today's environment for awhile before facing off--as if there were a full season of all time great teams, complete with off season training. It just doesn't seem fair in the least to hold that against an old time team.

Background aside, now that this team didn't go undefeated, I just don't see them ranking up there among the elites in any sense. They've only got a few future Hall of Famers: Brady, Moss, Harrison, maybe Lyght, maybe one of their linebackers should they win another Super Bowl.

Where the Giants really won the game was with their platoon defensive line.

I really meant to give a shout out to the Giants D-line in my pre-Bowl comment. Obviously I didn't pick the Giants, but one reason I did think they'd keep it close was that I felt like Umenyiora and Burress would each be the best player on the field when they were out there. Eli won the MVP with that final drive, which was obviously everything, but if Strahan or even Umenyiora had put up the numbers that Justin Tuck did, I think they might have handed the hardware to one of them as the defensive line was absolutely the MVP of that game. The safeties also really impressed me. They came up to hit on blitzes and running players but were never once out of position when Brady got time to find Moss deep.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

34

Hitler:Bloodthirsty Dictator, Die-hard Cowboys Fan

Shotgun Stockton.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:03:13 PM EST

4.87 (funny, informative, funny)

This isn't directly related to the discussion at hand, but I thought this was more than good enough that it needed to be shared. A WWII/Hitler movie really cleverly dubbed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2triiYXSY8

35

^ 34

Re: Eli SUCKS!

zyxwvutsr.

Tue Feb 05, 2008 at 01:58:40 PM EST

4.00 (astute)

That is hilarious.

33

Commercial

Degee.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 03:06:48 PM EST

4.50 (funny, funny)

Watching the Super Bowl is like the TV equivalent of flipping thru a Details magazine. Commercial, man thinks about next play, commercial, commercial, a throw, incomplete, commercial, a hand off, no gain, measurement, commercial, commercial. Fuck.

Am I a great person? Hell no - by most metrics I'm pretty much an asshole. -TSlothrop

31

Re: In a surprise victory, Giants take the Super B

PenitenziAgite.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:34:11 PM EST

4.33 (interesting, interesting, obnoxious)

I am supremely pleased that the Giants won.

I also think that the Patriots should have lost their right to play at all after they were caught cheating.  Had they won this Super Bowl, I would expect to see an asterisk by their name.

I hate the Patriots, and I have since Oakland was robbed by them after that bullshit call in the playoffs.

sierra tango foxtrot uniform

3

Woohoo!

thefadd.

Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:57:58 PM EST

4.00 (interesting)

Favorite sign in the crowd: 18-1.

Favorite ad: etrade baby.

Favorite play: the one when Manning slipped the tackle of every guy in the NE line and flung the ball downfield to Tyree for a helmet assisted catch, of course.

What a game. So happy to see New York pull it out and watch how angry the Pats are.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

8

^ 3

Re: Woohoo!

zyxwvutsr.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 09:28:19 AM EST

4.00 (astute)

My favorite ad was the Doritos giant rat. Second best was the Coca Cola balloon ad: clever and contrived at the same time, but who doesn't like to see Charlie Brown win?

Worst ad was the Doritos chick with the guitar. I kept waiting for something to happen, but it turned out to be no more than it appeared to be: some chick with a guitar and a nasal voice. Second worse was the Derak Jeter ad for whatever it was, because, fuck Derek Jeter.

10

^ 3

Re: Woohoo!

MayorBob.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:04:39 AM EST

4.00 (interesting, astute)

Best ad -- Tie between the Fed Ex giant pigeons and etrade baby.

Worst ad -- The follow your heart ad for Career Builder -- it was just grotesque.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

13

^ 3

Re: Woohoo!

port1080.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:27:35 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

Did anyone else find those ads for the sales leads company to be vaguely racist? The first one especially - it played strongly off Indian stereotypes. The second one was almost as bad ("wow, those Chinamen sure have funny accents and eat weird things!"), but at least it was masked by the fact that they were depicted as Pandas.

18

^ 13

Re: Woohoo!

gerrymander.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:21:10 AM EST

4.50 (astute)

Did anyone else find those ads for the sales leads company to be vaguely racist?

Vaguely? Vaguely?!? The pandas worked at a laundry! How the hell did this ever get past the planning stage?

20

^ 18

Re: 30% Cleaner

zyxwvutsr.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:30:02 AM EST

4.00 (funny)

How the hell did this ever get past the planning stage?
Ancient Chinese secret.

22

^ 13

Re: Woohoo!

delete me.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:41:06 AM EST

4.00 (astute)

The only thing they were missing was the buck teeth. WTF. If the other commercial was worse, then I'm glad I missed it.

- derumi (del-me)
"Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

27

^ 13

Re: Woohoo!

pO157.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:19:49 PM EST

3.00 (informative)

It was bad. There was a lot of "Holy shit, they're still letting that through?" at our house last night.

19

^ 3

Re: Woohoo!

gerrymander.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:27:15 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

Favorite ad: etrade baby.

Sadly, the etrade ads came far enough into the proceedings to be masked by conversation at the party I attended. But I liked the NFL robot vs. Terminator ad series at lot, and the Tide stain ad was hilarious.

11

Hail to the Giants!

MayorBob.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:13:29 AM EST

4.00 (interesting, interesting)

I'll have to admit, I was a doubter.  Couldn't stand the drill sergeant pose of Tom Coughlin and I was still waiting for Eli Manning to revert to his previous form.  I figured New England was good for the victory although I took the points and bet the Pats wouldn't cover the spread.  Shows what I know.  It also shows why it's always best when they actually go ahead and play the game rather than rely on betting lines or prognostications to determine who ends up with the Lombardi Trophy.

Eli deserved the MVP trophy because he came up big when it absolutely, positively counted for the Giants.  Yes, the Giants' defensive squad played phenomenal, but if Manning hadn't taken the team on that final TD drive (and who didn't love that sack avoiding toss to Tyree) the Patriots would be having the parade tomorrow instead of the Giants.  One great moment after the game was the shot of Jeff Feagles (the oldest player to play in a Super Bowl) with his family on the field, telling his kids to "take it all in."  It was truly a game worthy of the modifier super.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

1

Reflections

port1080.

Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:50:14 PM EST

none

Well, I guess I'll eat crow - I really thought the Pats would romp - although, I'm glad the Giants won, as it means my Steelers continue to only be challenged by the Cowboys & '49ers for most Super Bowl wins (if the Pats had won it would have given them four, placing them just one behind the three-way tie of the Steelers, Cowboys, and '49ers, which have five each).

I'm also glad because it sort of lets us sweep that whole Patriots cheating thing under the rug. Even if they were cheating, they lost the big one, so in the end it doesn't matter. As long as they keep their collective noses clean from here on out we can forget about it.

Speaking of poor sportsmanship, though - was anyone else bothered that Belichick ran off the field before they ran that final play? I'll grant that the play was really unnecessary, but it still felt like sore-loser syndrome to see him jogging off like that.

Manning Jr. as MVP? I don't know - nobody really stood out, but I might have given it to Steve Smith (who played a hell of a game for a rookie) or just collectively given it to either the defensive line or the offensive line (or both). Manning had all day in the pocket on most plays, even after they'd basically given up on the run in that last scoring drive. Brady, on the other hand, had almost no time at all. Still, it's hard to give it to any one lineman on either side, so I can see why it went to an offensive player - but it seems a little cheap.

Finally, who knew Tom Coughlin had it in him? After he fired his defensive coordinator last year and Tiki Barber aired the team's dirty laundry, it really looked like he was loosing control. Turns out that maybe it really was the defensive coordinator's fault, and also that maybe Tiki (and Shockey) were more the problem than the solution. Who woulda thought? Too bad the NBC broadcasts are done for the season - I would have loved to see Tiki eat crow.

2

^ 1

Re: Reflections

pO157.

Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:55:33 PM EST

4.00 (funny)

Speaking of poor sportsmanship, though - was anyone else bothered that Belichick ran off the field before they ran that final play? I'll grant that the play was really unnecessary, but it still felt like sore-loser syndrome to see him jogging off like that.  

Belicheck did seem like a dick doing that. Since the announcers commented that many of the Patriots had left the field following the coach I was trying to get a glimpse of who was actually on the field defending the final play in victory formation. The patriots seemed a bit more disorganized than I would expect. As such I assume it was made up of random special teams people and various 3rd string hangers on who simply ran out onto the field to make it into the record books as having played during the Super Bowl (or season) of the famous 18-1 New England squad. I really wish NBC had zoomed in on those player's jersies. I would have loved to see a place kicker hold down nose tackle during the Super Bowl, even if it was only for a play that existed just to satisfy some administrative requirement.

9

^ 2

Re: Reflections

nmiguy.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 09:31:45 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

Actually, the clock had kept running to zero when Belichick started running off the field.  He was almost on the other side before they put 1 second back on the clock.  Everyone loves to find something to complain about with Belichick.  

The guy just lost the Super Bowl and people are saying he lacks sportsmanship for walking off the field when the clock had expired?  He showed good sportsmanship in his post game interview and gave credit to the Giants.

With Spy-gate and all the whining everybody else in the league has been doing, it seems to me everybody else has shown a lack of sportsmanship.  When people try and make excuses and call Belichick and the Patriots cheaters, they are not accepting the talent and quality of their opponent and becoming whining biatches.  

It is pathetic, like blaming a loss on a referee or something.  

Look the Giants beat the Patriots fair and square, coach Coughlin showed good sportsmanship and decency.  Eli showed poise and toughness.  Strahan displayed tenacity and will to win.  

Don't beat up on Belichick, the guy just lost the last game of the season, and the first loss of the season.  That is certainly hard enough.  He's a great coach and he is loved by many.  And he has a ton of class in what he says and does.  

32

^ 9

the inevitable karma smackdown for Billybeli

1fastdog.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 02:04:07 PM EST

5.00 (astute, astute, obnoxious)

 Everyone loves to find something to complain about with Belichick.  

Perhaps he should stop handing them the ammunition to do so, eh?

With Spy-gate and all the whining everybody else in the league has been doing, it seems to me everybody else has shown a lack of sportsmanship.

 Getting caught spying or cheating automatically disqualifies a team from complaining that people are calling them on their transgressions.

When people try and make excuses and call Belichick and the Patriots cheaters, they are not accepting the talent and quality of their opponent and becoming whining biatches.  

Biatches??? Really? Man, that's putting 'em in their place, all those no-goodniks out there spreading facts and truths and not accepting the Patriots' talent. Next thing you know, they'll be spouting off on how the Patriots weren't even good enough to beat a mediocre NFC east team. Scandalous.

And he has a ton of class in what he says and does.  

Only if you're blind, deaf, and willing to set reality aside. So, yeah, other than the things he says and does, the man's a total class act. Total.

Somewhere in my soul, there's always Rock -n- Roll... Joe Strummer

12

^ 9

Re: Reflections

zyxwvutsr.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:18:20 AM EST

3.00 (interesting)

...the Giants beat the Patriots fair and square...
How is it that Pierre Woods lost the fumbled ball that he clearly recovered? There was some nasty shit going on in that dogpile - sure that's part of the game, but it's not exactly "fair and square."

16

^ 12

Re: Reflections

Jackkeefe.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:46:45 AM EST

4.00 (astute, informative)

Pierre Woods lost the fumbled ball that he clearly recovered?

Because of some alcohol intake, my memory of theeaxact sequence is a little fuzzy.  But we rewound the play a few timse on TIVO and you could see that Bradshaw hads his hand betweens Woods and the ball.  I don't think Woods ever had the chance to secure it before Bradshaw ripped it from him.  My alcohol tainted impression was that the Pats would have lost a challenge.  

36

^ 12

Re: Reflections

nmiguy.

Tue Feb 19, 2008 at 01:26:42 PM EST

4.00

I think that chain of events was early enough in the game not to have mattered much.  If I recall correctly the recovery by the Giants did not end up in points scored that drive, right?  

Ultimately, I think the Patriots had the better team, but that night teh Giants wanted it better.  

The measure to take is clutch time.  The Patriots couldn't get the sack, Eli got away and threw up a prayer.  Teree grabbed it with his helmet and made a great play.  The Patriots had many chances to put the game away.  Asante drops an interception, on 3rd down Meriweather lets a guy get a key catch and get out to stop the clock.  Eli and the Giants showed poise down the stretch and the Pats did not, so in that aspect (regardless of officiating) the team that won deserved to win.  I speak as a huge Patriots fan.  You won't catch me whining about it.  I hope Eli enjoys Disney World.  

14

^ 12

Re: Reflections

MayorBob.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:28:13 AM EST

3.50 (interesting)

Question -- "How is it that Pierre Woods lost the fumbled ball that he clearly recovered?"

Answer -- a Giant stole it from him.  The thing is that Belichick could have disputed the call but he chose not to.  It's probably a decision he'll be kicking himself (and Pierre Woods) over for years to come.  Actually, with the exception of the fumble scrum, the game was decently called by the officiating crew.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

15

^ 14

Re: Reflections

port1080.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:34:29 AM EST

none

Actually, with the exception of the fumble scrum, the game was decently called by the officiating crew.

Ehh, it was okay, but I noticed another pretty bad call early in the game. On one of the first long passes that Eli hit (I forget who it was too) the Giants receiver very clearly pushed off the Pats defender to get a few feet of separation just before the ball got to him. It sure looked like offensive pass interference to me. Then again, maybe it was just karmic retribution for all the times the refs allowed Pats defenders to mug the Colt's receivers ten or fifteen yards up the field without calling defensive holding. Anyway, I still think the Giants would have won, even leaving those plays aside. They just were the more physical team, all up and down the field, on both sides of the ball. The Patriots only had one honest scoring drive (their last touchdown). The first score came on a short field, and other than that they really couldn't move the ball effectively at all. If the Giants hadn't shot themselves in the foot a few times, it wouldn't have been nearly as close.

17

^ 15

Re: Reflections

Minos.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:12:04 AM EST

4.66 (brilliant, interesting, astute)

I noticed that one, too.  Unfortunately, it's pretty common.  Just about every game I watched this season had an instance of blatant offensive pass interference, with no call.  Defensive pass interference, on the other hand, the referees are eager to call.  It's just another instance of bias toward offense in the NFL.  I doubt we'll be seeing the Competition Committee address this any time soon.  Like Romeo Crennel said last year, "It's a fan-friendly league, and the fans like offense."

26

^ 17

Re: Reflections

Shy Elf.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:08:32 PM EST

5.00 (interesting)

I agree.  That was clearly offensive pass interference, which is badly under-called in the NFL.   I wouldn't call them eager to call defensive pass interference, which I think they actually do a quite good job on in general in the NFL.  For the penalty to be fair, it should only be called where the receiver would have had a good chance to catch the ball if not for the contact, and not for any contact in general.  I see a lot of plays in the NFL where they defender hits the receiver with his body before the ball gets there and then gets his hand on the ball first to knock the ball away, which are usually correctly called as incidental contact.  There are however a lot of plays where the offense shoves off which is not called and then the defense does the same thing on the same play and is called for interference.

If you want to see defensive pass interference badly overcalled, look at college ball, where it is commonly called for any contact whether it keeps the receiver from catching the ball or not, and whether the ball is close enough to the receiver to be caught or not.  Of course, the damage is less with only a 15 yard penalty.  Offensive pass interference is also badly undercalled in college ball.

28

^ 17

Re: Reflections

pO157.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:22:06 PM EST

4.00 (astute, astute)

I doubt we'll be seeing the Competition Committee address this any time soon.  Like Romeo Crennel said last year, "It's a fan-friendly league, and the fans like offense."

The fans also like post TD showboating and insane end-zone celebrations and those got banned. :(

21

^ 1

Re: Reflections

gerrymander.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:37:55 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

Brady, on the other hand, had almost no time at all.

The one thing which struck me as odd was the Pats inability to see the consistent success with one play: the short snap. Every short pass play worked, and would have obviated the advantage the Giants' otherwise strong defense had.

23

^ 21

Re: Reflections

delete me.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:42:17 AM EST

4.00 (funny)

See, I was pretty sure they would've caught that during their video tape review at halftime.

- derumi (del-me)
"Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

25

^ 21

Re: Reflections

Degee.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:54:58 AM EST

4.00 (interesting)

"Every short pass play worked"

So where was Mike Vrabel? DId I just miss him or did he sit this one out?

Am I a great person? Hell no - by most metrics I'm pretty much an asshole. -TSlothrop

5

^ 1

Re: Reflections

thefadd.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 02:03:03 AM EST

none

I don't think it should be swept under the rug and it doesn't look like it will be either. I hope NE goes into the Super Bowl Loser funk and their "dynasty" completely unravels.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

7

^ 1

Losing Sucks

uncarved block.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 08:50:52 AM EST

none

    Yeah, it will go down as poor sportsmanship, but I'm not sure the Pats would have gotten any more love by acting classy-- and at least we have something closer to genuine emotion than the veneer. What, the CW about Belichick being a remote, domineering asshole* was going to suddenly reverse course because of one performance after a SB loss? If we want to complain about anything from the Hoody, it's that nobody from the league told him to shape up his PR appearance a couple years ago.
    MVP should have gone to Wes Welker, but much like the absurd expectations that make losing the SB worse than not making the playoffs at all~, actually giving the reward to a player on the losing team is out of the question.
    Will the Pats eventually win another championship? I wouldn't bet against it. Brady has at least 2-3 more great years ahead of him, and Belichick will be as shrewd as ever. Having a seriously good chance to play for a title every year is a great draw for talent, and a very powerful tool at the bargaining table, so I expect to see this dynasty go on for at least another couple years. No undefeated seasons, though :)

    *How do you feel about Bob Knight, for instance? Can you separate the genius coach from the chair throwing asshole? Has Knight's bad behavior even enhanced his persona for some fans? Personally, I'd prefer that both coaches had gotten a good spanking for being such poor role models, but then I'm just one sports fan among millions.
   ~Hyperbole, but just barely. YMMV.

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

6

Back-to-Back Brother Champions?

delete me.

Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 02:26:43 AM EST

none

Has that ever been done before?

The win by the Giants wasn't much of a surprise to me, I was expecting a low-scoring defensive game. Just not that low scoring. Still, I figured the Pats would have the upper hand, and I intensely dilkaf;oieqwknads.varrgh Eli Manning for being a wimpy whiner when he got drafted by the Chargers. Brady looked fine on his knee, so I believe the Pats were as full-strength as they were going to get.

MVP should have been Strahan or someone else on the defensive line.

Whatever my opinion of Eli, that scramble out of that near-sack and that pass he threw was a thing of beauty.

"Sack. Sack. Sack. Sack. Goddammit. Whoa. Daaaaamn."

For me, this ties with the Rams-Patriots Super Bowl as the most fun to watch. It seems that whenever the underdog wins, the game gets better.

The best Super Bowl, of course, is when the Chargers came within 24 points of upsetting the 49ers. :P

- derumi (del-me)
"Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

This story: 36 comments (0 from subqueue)
Post a Comment