Etcetera

Laughter, The Final Solution

MayorBob.

Posted to Etcetera on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 02:58:06 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Sam Gross is a cartoonist.  He seems cut from the same bolt of cloth as Charles Addams or Gary Larson.  His métier is to take the ordinary, give it a bizarre twist, but make sure it's funny.  Gross' latest effort is one which could hit a raw nerve rather than the funny bone, however.  Because, in the mind of at least one book critic, even when the cartoon's drawn by a 74-year-old Jew, not everyone is going to be amused.

Gross' collection is entitled We Have Ways of Making You Laugh: 120 Funny Swastika Cartoons.  Are funny and swastika two words which could possibly be connected?  Yes, according to the editorial review at amazon.com which called the collection "his most heartfelt -- and hilarious -- book yet."  Not so much, according to Doree Lewak, who finds the launching of the book at around the same time as the 60th anniversary of the establishment of Israel to be as untimely as Gross' stated goal of breaking down stereotypes to be unconvincing.  Of course, the swastika has a history which predates Nazi Germany.  But, even if you go back before the Nazis turned it into a symbol of death and hate, you don't find a very rich trove of swastika humor offerings.  According to Gross, he's been thinking seriously about demystifying the swastika for more than ten years.  He first was struck by the need to deglamorize and mock the symbol when the lead story on the evening news was about a kid who spraypainted swastikas on cars:

"Why is this the lead story, I thought? That kid obviously meant to be provocative, and he was doing his job... The media, though, shouldn't have given him the chance, shouldn't have made the swastika such a forbidden and exciting thing. The news gave it too much power."
After that, Gross began drawing cartoons lampooning swastikas.  The current collection of 120 is the first of a series (Gross has an additional 360 more cartoons already drawn).  Because Gross' attempts are so obviously aimed at Nazi uses of the swastika, the book falls into the broad category of Holocaust humor, a comic form which was even known to exist in the deathcamps.  Rabbi Moshe Waldocks calls this brand of humor a legitimate coping mechanism to help, "particularly second generation" Holocaust survivors, cope with the "incomprehensible tragedy" of the Holocaust:
"In every joke is the hint of the hidden horror. This is not laughter through tears, it is laughter despite tears. Humor also punctures, wounds, shocks, and reveals. If they're doing the job right, the prophet and the jester have similar roles. Both are making the comfortable uncomfortable."
Some see Gross' product and they find "the risk is not worth the reward" - the attempt at humor doesn't ease anyone's pain, it just trivializes everything.  Worse yet, according to Thane Rosenbaum, it not only "trivializes history ... it traumatizes people."  Rosenbaum believes only Holocaust survivors "have the moral authority" not a  "putz" like Gross.  On the other hand, another book review noted that Gross' primary employer, The New Yorker only bought one of his swastika cartoons, but never published it.  This reviewer believes the magazine was onto something because, "as a group, the cartoons are funnier and more meaningful."

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, cartoons, humor, gallows humor, Holocaust, swastika, books (all tags)

This story: 12 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

He read his gas bill

Steve Urkel.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 03:21:00 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

I obviously have a high tolerance for the offensive, and I haven't read the book (I found the cartoon in The Forward link niether offensive nor funny), so some questions.

Why are only Jews asked if this is offensive? Shouldn't, for example, how Poles feel also matter, as well as the opinions of Americans who fought against Nazis?

"Doree Lewak, who finds the launching of the book at around the same time as the 60th anniversary of the establishment of Israel to be...untimely"

"Around the same time" - is this woman serious? Should the publisher also make sure the book isn't published "around the same time" as some Hindu holiday?

4

^ 1

Re: He read his gas bill

MayorBob.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:36:47 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

To borrow the words of one of the other people I quoted in my write up -- Doree Lewak is a putz.  The intent of Gross is obvious here.  He's not trying to diminish the historical record of the Nazis and their swastika.  He's trying to show how banal and pitiful it is that hatemongers today, young and old, believe the symbol should have the same power over people in the 21st century it had for those under its sway in Nazi Germany.

I haven't bought the book and the swastika cartoons I've seen haven't really done much for me in terms of making me feel they've had any real impact on the symbol.  Maybe, Gross' method has a madness to it that only works after you view a whole bunch of them at one sitting.  I know that was always my reaction to Gary Larson; read one Far Side strip and it might leave me cold or make me chuckle but read a series of them and you begin to get his vibe.  The thing is that Gross is not trying to turn Dr. Mengele or Goebbels into funny figures; he's trying to take the skinhead tagger with a spraycan and turn him into an object of derision.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

5

^ 4

Re: He read his gas bill

thefadd.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:47:06 PM EST

5.00 (interesting)

Yeah, I think this is a good example of someone taking something that is offense and sort of "making it their own." It's a common way to dis-empower oppressors. It's hard for me to believe that that someone like Lewak doesn't understand this. The only conclusion then is that she's being disingenuous in order to draw attention to herself or her cause in an obnoxious way.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

2

^ 1

Re: He read his gas bill

Shy Elf.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 03:55:32 PM EST

none

Try here, sorted by popularity to make him look good.

3

^ 2

Re: He read his gas bill

Steve Urkel.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:03:53 PM EST

none

Those aren't his swastika ones. The "The suggestions are supposed to go in the box." one is funny.  

 

6

Interesting

uncarved block.

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 07:13:40 PM EST

5.00 (informative, offtopic)

    I've been a fan of Sam Gross for decades. There was a copy of I Am Blind And My Dog Is Dead in my house as far back as I can remember, and it had a lot to do with the adult I turned out to be. (Along with  Gahan Wilson and Bill Kliban.) If I can't spot a Gross cartoon from ten feet away, it's because he's been copied by so many cartoonists-- but the style, simple as it looks, is very consistent. Not as eye-catching as Addams or Wilson, but it gets the job done.
    I'm not surprised that Gross turned out 120 cartoons on the subject. Like many other in that line of work, he had some themes he'd return to repeatedly-- I can recall at least four "little matchstick girl" cartoons*, for instance, and well over a dozen riffing off of fairy tales. Clearly, the man could easily turn out this many variations on a topic, if his mind was set on it.
    Can he be offensive? Oh hell yes~, which is one reason why he's likely to blow off any criticism from that direction. Heck, he may be happy for the controversy; I haven't followed his career closely, but he's been so consistent for so long that he must feel like part of the woodwork in the cartooning world, which makes catching the attention of a wider audience very hard indeed. A nice tour on CNN, Fox and MSNBC? Thank you, may I have another?
     The main problem it looks like I'll have with the book is that none of the cartoons I've seen look to be very good, even for someone who has churned out a ton of shrug inducing work in the last couple years. Did he blink in the face of turning such a symbol of evil into something funny? Is this a case of an artist letting an ulterior motive interfere with his style of art that flourished precisely because the earlier humor was so unencumbered with it? Or maybe I'm wrong. Sam is certainly cagey enough not to give his best work out for free when the book's just about to hit the shelves, and ten or twenty of these cartoons will be among his best. (If that sounds low, it's because he's already got a such a huge backlog of great work. His self-set standards are already pretty high, IMO.) Here's hoping a copy of the book wanders into my store soon after release, so I can find out for sure without having to pay anything to do so . . .

    *All time favorite of these, and one of my favorite cartoons ever, has two firemen at the scene of a fire, with a matchstick girl behind them. One fireman is saying (likely sotto voce) to the other, "fourth time I've seen her this week".
   ~IIRC, he drew the cartoon for National Lampoon in which a man wearing a shirt saying "Party Animal" is opening a door holding a man in a wheelchair and shirt reading "Party Vegetable." And there's always the legless frog that made it on the Lampoon polo shirts . . .

Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; e luce ad tenebras

9

Re: Laughter, The Final Solution

keta.

Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 11:18:59 AM EST

5.00 (astute, brilliant)

You know who trivializes history?  Those who say that history can only be told one way - their way - and that any other attempts are unworthy.

Fuck the lot of them.

7

Re: Laughter, The Final Solution

skeptic.

Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:25:55 AM EST

4.00 (astute)

Similar issues were raised by Mel Brooks' movie (and subsequent musical, and subsequent movie version of the musical) "The Producers" which also uses Nazi Germany as a subject of humor.  Brooks has said that this was his form of revenge against the Nazis, to turn them into objects of humor.  I personally thought that "The Producers" was only partially successful, but still I give it credit for taking on a tremendous artistic challenge, as Gross has now also done, of finding humor in what is inherently the most painful subject in human history.

There was also a time in the career of Lenny Bruce when he attempted to prove to us that if we could just laugh at racially derogatory language, it would lose its power over us, an attempt which had a mixed outcome.  People are still offended by such language, yet others now use it in an ironic sense, and the controversy continues.  It is too bad that Lenny Bruce died of a drug overdose, because he might otherwise still be making a useful contribution to these discussions.

Because there are still people alive today (a dwindling number) who were victims of Nazi Germany, and many people alive today who have personal connections to people who were victims of Nazi Germany, the emotions remain raw.  In another hundred years, possibly it will be much easier to make jokes on this subject.  Attila the Hun committed horrible crimes as well, but nobody is still upset about him after all these years.

8

^ 7

Re: Laughter, The Final Solution

ms sue.

Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 10:24:39 AM EST

4.00 (astute)

Brooks has said that this was his form of revenge against the Nazis, to turn them into objects of humor....

Because there are still people alive today (a dwindling number) who were victims of Nazi Germany, and many people alive today who have personal connections to people who were victims of Nazi Germany, the emotions remain raw.  In another hundred years, possibly it will be much easier to make jokes on this subject.  Attila the Hun committed horrible crimes as well, but nobody is still upset about him after all these years. [emphasis mine]

It will be easier because they will have little context and no underlying point.

10

^ 8

Re: Laughter, The Final Solution

skeptic.

Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 08:54:06 AM EST

5.00 (brilliant)

Well, they (comedians a century hence, whom we imagine to be making jokes about the Third Reich) will have no first-had context, but they will still have a historical context.  History remains relevant.  There are still lessons to be learned from such things as, for example, the French Revolution and the ensuing Napoleonic Wars, of which there are no longer any surviving veterans or victims.  (And yes, people do still make jokes about Napoleon.)  I think that the human race needs to remember Nazi Germany for as long as it continues to exist, because we really do need to learn from our collective mistakes, and as mistakes go, that was a really big one.  And perhaps we also need to make jokes about those mistakes.  And even if we don't need to, it's still fun.

11

Re: Laughter, The Final Solution

skeeter1.

Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 03:26:20 AM EST

none

Count me among of the unamused.  My late father spent 3 years in Europe during WWII.  There was nothing funny about the war, or any war for that matter.

Sam Gross, Jew that he might be, is in my mind disrespectful of all that lost their lives.  Humor?  I don't see any.

there's only one way to find out...

12

^ 11

This damn tree leaks!

Lou.

Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 12:33:50 PM EST

none

Not even Bill Mauldin?

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

This story: 12 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment