But Obama hasn't completely severed his ties to Wright
Yes, he has. Several times.
Obama has rescinded his previous invitation to Rev. Wright to give the invocation at Obama's official presidential announcement. he's disavowed Wright and issued this statement:
Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.
Obama has dis-invited Wright from official functions, he's condemned the statements Wright made that have the GOP's panties in a wad and Wright has retired from Obama's church. What more do you want? Does Obama have to go TP the man's house live on Fox News? Spit in his face during a very special episode of 30 Rock?
But then it really doesn't matter how many times Obama disavows and condemns Wright. Obama could kill Rev. Wright by stabbing him through the heart with a giant cross, offer it up as a sacrifice to God, mount Wright's head on the front of the Campaign bus and the GOP would still whine about some sort of "connection": "I heard Obama hooked the head up to a life-support system so Rev. Wright can still give campaign advice on how to kill Whitey. See, 'Wright' really means 'White', so by killing Rev. Wright he's showing how he's going to put all the white people in camps as soon as he's elected."
The GOP has no issues beyond "stay the course", so they're jumping all over the smallest things that can possibly be tied to Obama and just plain lying. Wait until summer: we'll see the triumphant return of "Obama smokes! We can't have a President who smokes! Booze and cocaine, yes, but not tobacco! Think of the children!"
-=Logan
Research, facts, a Republican needs not these things.
14
9
|
Re: No, he hasn't
Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 09:06:49 PM EST
|
"it really doesn't matter how many times Obama disavows and condemns Wright"
He hasn't disavowed or condemned Wright, only "the statements that have been the subject of this controversy".
"What more do you want?"
Obama should clarify his contradictory statements:
His initial reaction to the initial ABC News broadcast of Rev. Wright's sermons denouncing the U.S. was that he had never heard his pastor of 20 years make any comments that were anti-U.S. until the tape was played on air.
But yesterday, he told a different story.
"Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes," he said in his speech yesterday in Philadelphia.
Obama did not say what he heard that he considered "controversial," and the campaign has yet to answer repeated requests for dates on which the senator attended Rev. Wright's sermons over the last 20 years.
He should explain
specifically where he agrees with the expressed racial philosophy of the church he's been part of for 20 years. If he doesn't agree with any of it, he should explain why it doesn't bother him. He evaded doing this in his speech, as well as implying that people who criticize his church are racist, since "Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety."
Obama should be asked if he was aware Wright preached that AIDS was a government conspiracy. If the answer is yes, since Wright is a close personal friend and has had such a profound influence on his life, Obama should explain why never confronted Wright about propagating such nonsense.
He should explain why he's so much more tolerant of Wright than he is of Imus. Was he merely being an oppoortunist in regards to Imus, or does he have a double standard for whites and blacks, or both?