Our Next Corporate Retreat Will Be In Gitmo.
MayorBob.
Posted to Business on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 04:38:40 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.
His former bosses are calling it a "training incident" that went poorly. Chad Hudgens calls it torture, enough to take his former employer to court over what happened. His ex-employer is saying a). Chad voluntarily participated in the exercise, and b). it really wasn't all that bad.
Hudgens used to work for Prosper, Inc. in Provo, Utah. Prosper sells training (they call it mentoring) in a variety of areas like real estate sales, stock market investing and entrepreneurship. Although the company says they're doing quite well, Hudgens sales team was going through a rough patch last May. Hudgens' supervisor, Joshua Christopherson, decided the time was ripe for a little initiative booster. So, he had the team assemble and he picked Hudgens to be the subject of a training exercise - waterboarding.
There is no dispute between Hudgens and Prosper that he was waterboarded. The company claims Hudgens was a willing volunteer - he disputes that. The company claims that the incident wasn't as bad as Hudgens lawsuit claims - he contends it was much worse than he can begin to express. Chad claims he was forcibly held down while another team member poured a bucket of water down his throat and up his nose. He claims he tried to get the exercise to stop and he came close to passing out during it. After the exercise was done, Chistopherson said to the rest of the team:"You saw how hard Chad fought for air right there. I want you to go back inside and fight that hard to make sale."
Prosper claims that, while the exercise was rough and unauthorized, it didn't rise to the level of torture. The company's general counsel George Brunt wants everyone to understand this is not what the company is all about and states "I don't know if this would even be an issue if it weren't for Guantanamo Bay." Prosper's president Dave Ellis asks: "How many times did the CIA even do waterboarding? Three times?" Brunt, being more of a realist than Ellis admits this could damage Prosper's image. Regardless of whatever damage might be done to Prosper's image, Ellis plans on fighting the lawsuit, saying it views the claim for (US)$10,000 as a "shakedown for money."
Hudgen's lawyer, Sean Egan, claims that Prosper took no action in response to Hudgens' complaint to Human Resources after the incident. Ellis claims the company conducted a "thorough investigation." Ellis pointed out the company had recently been recognized as among the state's best employers (scroll to pg 16 of pdf doc), "this is nothing like how we treat our employees."
< Does A 50 Cent Heist Equal Five Years In Jail?
What's not good about a new GI Bill? >
