SciTech

Harvest of Fear: Monsanto Corp.

HidingFromGoro.

Posted to SciTech on Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 07:39:02 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

I first heard of the Monsanto Corporation when I watched the documentary The Future of Food (Google Video link), which talked about its deplorable business practices, including RIAA-like copyright lawsuits over seeds that sometimes result in prison terms (even if pollen from your neighbor's farm spreads genetic material to your plants, you're still liable!) and powerful lobbying efforts to prevent labeling of genetically modified food- which have resulted in serious health problems for people who've inadvertently developed antibiotic resistance as a result of eating such food.  

The Monsanto fun doesn't end there, however.  They've been also been linked to everything from a cancer-accelerating bovine growth hormone controversy, to the Terminator Gene controversy, bribery scandals, a $700 million judgment for poisoning an Alabama town, Agent Orange poisoning of Vietnam vets, and even child labor violations.

Now there's a Vanity Fair piece on the company, which has turned its sights on milk production.  Frontline piece on Monsanto.


Like many others in rural America, Rinehart knew of Monsanto's fierce reputation for enforcing its patents and suing anyone who allegedly violated them. But Rinehart wasn't a farmer. He wasn't a seed dealer. He hadn't planted any seeds or sold any seeds. He owned a small--a really small--country store in a town of 350 people. He was angry that somebody could just barge into the store and embarrass him in front of everyone. "It made me and my business look bad," he says. Rinehart says he told the intruder, "You got the wrong guy."

When the stranger persisted, Rinehart showed him the door. On the way out the man kept making threats. Rinehart says he can't remember the exact words, but they were to the effect of: "Monsanto is big. You can't win. We will get you. You will pay."

Scenes like this are playing out in many parts of rural America these days as Monsanto goes after farmers, farmers' co-ops, seed dealers--anyone it suspects may have infringed its patents of genetically modified seeds. As interviews and reams of court documents reveal, Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country. They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops; infiltrate community meetings; and gather information from informants about farming activities. Farmers say that some Monsanto agents pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the "seed police" and use words such as "Gestapo" and "Mafia" to describe their tactics.  

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by HidingFromGoro, Monsanto, agriculture, farming (all tags)

This story: 7 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Re: Harvest of Fear: Monsanto Corp.

skeeter1.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 10:03:18 AM EST

none

Monsanto has been an evil beast for many years.  I doubt they'll come looking for me and my little garden of tomatoes, kohlrabi, and herbs.  None of the seeds came from Monsanto, and if the tomatoes get cross-pollinated with Monsanto pollen, well that's too fucking bad.  

there's only one way to find out...

2

"Gestapo?"

profwhat.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 01:52:09 PM EST

none

Calling them "Gestapo" or "Mafia" seems pretty extreme.  They have a patent.  They sue people for infringing the patent.  The people they are suing are small fry.  That's questionable, but... Gestapo?  It's not like they are assisting in genocide, here.  They are just being dicks in court, as is their right.

Also:  "RIAA-like copyright lawsuits over seeds that sometimes result in prison terms" -- come on.  I see the "RIAA-like" part, because they're a big organization suing little guys, but there is no way this results in anything more than money changing hands.  There is no prison penalty for patent infringement.

3

^ 2

Re: "Gestapo?"

thefadd.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 02:22:38 PM EST

none

It's not like they are assisting in genocide, here.

They're not? What about their business practices in India that have left whole villages cancer ravaged.

They have a patent.  They sue people for infringing the patent.

It sound to me that by allowing their seeds to blow into other people's crops they aren't protecting this patent. If one of their court opponents had the resources to bring such a case to a high enough court, I would expect such common sense IP law would have to be applied. In the mean time, they protect themselves like any big company but the fact that they do so with the food supply is what disturbs people.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

4

^ 2

Re: "Gestapo?"

HidingFromGoro.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 05:40:54 PM EST

none

The very first link mentions an 8-month prison sentence for one farmer.  And even discounting the patent suits or GM debate there's still the toxic waste dumping and child labor issues.  I mean, using children in India to handle pesticides?  The company is abhorrent.

5

^ 4

Wikipedia

profwhat.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 08:08:19 PM EST

none

The "first link" is to Wikipedia, and it has a big fat "[citation needed]" right after the sentence that mentions the prison sentence.  I call BS on this -- I can't imagine how a civil case "turned into" a criminal prosecution, or how patent infringement can be a crime.

Yes, child labor and toxic dumping are bad.  Can you recommend an alternative, responsible chemical/agricultural company?

6

^ 5

Re: Wikipedia

thefadd.

Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 08:55:42 PM EST

5.00 (astute, informative)

Took some rooting. It turns out that for whatever reason Monsanto doesn't want farmers saving its seeds from one season to the next. My uneducated guess would be that between the profits and the continual genetic modification the company has relatively legitimate (if somewhat despicable in the sense that reality television is a despicable form of entertainment) reasons for wanting to do this. It seems that this particular farmer violated this agreement in a rather innocent mistake but none the less something he shouldn't have done. Monsanto (as any large corporation is wont to do) didn't look so kindly on this. Instead of coming clean, the guy destroyed evidence and changed his story, which in turn the Fed don't look to kindly on, leading to criminal prosecution. All in all nothing close to illegal on the part of Monsanto, but certainly not someone I'd want to do business with as a consumer or a were I farmer--they it seems many farmers feel they have little choice, which in a "free" market is in and of itself problematic in the way people always bitch about microsoft.

Now Monsanto's business in practices in India are so well documented that I'm not going to bother looking them up. Any human being who cares about other human beings should pretty much want the lot of them shot for that business.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

7

^ 5

citation needed

HidingFromGoro.

Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 05:41:25 AM EST

none

Nope, I can't recommend an alternative company with exclusive rights to the Roundup-Ready Gene or the Terminator Gene.  Guess I'm finished- you hit it out of the park on this one, champ.

And the Indian kids handling pesticides?  I've got to take the good with the bad, I suppose.  

I get it now- the groundwater contamination?  It's unavoidable because free market.

This story: 7 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment