Music

Erykah Badu - New Amerykah Part One (4th World War) [review]

1fastdog.

Posted to Music on Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 09:54:57 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

R & B songstress drops an album full of funky, freakadelic weirdness that reaches for parts unknown.

Released in February, Badu's latest is chock full of bewildering, yet wonderful moments of all-out funk, psychedelia-laced R & B, bits and pieces of the Neo-Soul sound that she's known for, and a throw-it-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks attitude that some listeners may find oddly disconcerting.
Aside from the lead single Honey, which is closer in tone to her past efforts, the rest of the album is a journey through an amalgamation of styles that don't necessarily connect upon first swing. There's narration and spoken dialog (including some helium-infused vocals) peppering some of the tracks, album opener Amerykhan Promise in particular. There's also fuzzy R & B samples and an overall retro sound present that hearkens back to an earlier era of R & B. This album is the first in a supposed series and while it never claims itself to be a concept album, there's plenty of evidence that it is indeed an album that presents an overarching narrative. Badu had a handful of producers involved in the making of this album and it's a testament to the underlying vision of Badu herself, that this album doesn't fall apart under the weight of its ambition and intentions. This is one those albums that music critics tend to love and that casual fans tend to hate, mostly because it defies the expectations of both groups. The question in the midst of all this experimentalism - which includes some strange lyrical musings from Miss Badu - is whether the album holds up to repeated listening. And yeah, it does.
Tracklist, final thoughts, and a video to follow:


 1. Amerykahn Promise
 2. The Healer
 3. Me
 4. My People
 5. Soldier
 6. The Cell
 7. Twinkle
 8. Master Teacher
 9. That Hump
 10. Telephone
 11. Honey

This album is a classic grower. The first time I gave it a spin it left me a little cold as some of the experiments seem to intrude on the music rather than enhance it. Repeated spins made more and more sense and revealed a much more cohesive experience than my cursory first playing of the album. That said, there are still some annoyances don't get better with time. The last minute and fifteen seconds of Me consists of Badu ruining an otherwise silky slice of R & B with some off key caterwauling. Likewise, Twinkle has some goofy vocal exercises and narratives that hijack the end of what's otherwise a pretty cool track. Why? I've no idea, but they're crying out for an edit. My People is an exercise in repetitive lyrics and phrasing that never goes anywhere new no matter how many times you hear it. Some of the narratives and voice-overs are also a bit more than the average listener is probably willing to bargain for, though they do seem to be indebted to Badu's concept of the album as a whole.
The rest of the album - which is very pretty-sounding despite the bevy of boundaries it explores - slowly sinks its teeth into you with hooks that are ever so soft; indeed they're almost non-existent on first listen, but all the better to snare you with later. In the end we're left with an album that succeeds very well if you've got a bit of patience to let it sway you. This is an adventuresome album that although it doesn't always hit a home-run, it sure isn't afraid to swing for the fences. 7 out of 10 and recommended for anyone looking for a little something different and unexpected.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by 1fastdog, music, review, Erykah Badu, R & B, Neo-Soul (all tags)

This story: 3 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

not your typical sexed-up R & B disc

1fastdog.

Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 03:47:39 PM EST

none

Those looking for R & B to accompany their bedroom endeavours should move along, as this album - aside from a track or two - won't fit that particular need. This one of those albums that you have to uncork your ears and hear a few times and let it soak in. While you don't have engage in any mental gymnastics to appreciate the album, ya oughtta have your brain engaged a little just to appreciate the conceptual vibe - fuzzy though it may be - that surrounds this experiment in psychedelic R & B.
As noted in the w/up, this album isn't immediately catchy, but it does manage to worm its way into your head after a few spins, nonetheless.
And for those that are thinking that this may be a tad too experimental for their ears, I'd like to point out that this isn't a loud, skronky record at all. It's actually very well recorded and while funky, still brings a nice, mellow vibe to the table. If you like the linked video, you'll probably dig the rest of the disc. Fair warning though, that song is easily the most poppy, R & B song on the album and if you don't expect the rest of the songs to be clones of that tune, you'll probably enjoy the rest of the album's attempts at branching out a bit.

Somewhere in my soul, there's always Rock -n- Roll... Joe Strummer

2

^ 1

Re: not your typical sexed-up R & B disc

port1080.

Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 05:28:07 PM EST

none

Something you wrote: Aside from the lead single Honey, which is closer in tone to her past efforts...This is one those albums that music critics tend to love and that casual fans tend to hate, mostly because it defies the expectations of both groups... brought something to my mind - how obligated are artists to stick by their past styles? It seems to me that very few artists have successfully gone in a completely different direction from what made them successful, and yet at the same time many artists also get criticized after a time for "just turning out the same stuff" and not doing anything different. Of course it's hard to satisfy the fans (who want more of the same) and the critics (who, as you note, favor the artist who defies their expectations). Leaving the commercial aspect of it aside, though, and looking at it more from a perspective of art for art's sake - is there anything necessarily wrong with just turning out more of the same? Presumably, after all, this is what the artist is best at. If we could play them for fresh ears who had no knowledge of an artist's past, would those later albums sound better than the earlier works, or does the tired repetition shine through regardless?

3

^ 2

depends

1fastdog.

Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 06:30:19 PM EST

none

is there anything necessarily wrong with just turning out more of the same? Presumably, after all, this is what the artist is best at.

Generally speaking, there's nothing wrong with an artist staying within their comfort zone, but I think a large portion of fans like to see at least a little growth over time. And I don't mean growth as abandoning their style or anything; more like adding/mixing a little bit of perhaps a different genre within the framework of an artist's strength. Lotta times it depends on what style of music a band or artist plays - f'rinstance, power pop is a pretty confining genre to branch out of. It's supposedly one of the simplest types of music to play because of it's basic structure. Ironically, because it's so simple, it's also hard to write songs that stand out from the crowd. I bring this up because one of my favorite bands is the power pop juggernaut, Fountains Of Wayne, who happen to take a lot of crap from the hipster crowd because they don't "grow" and their albums always sound the same. Well, yes and no. I've got all of their albums and while they have a distinctive sound, none of their albums are rehashings of any earlier work, yet they do have a similarity in that they're immediately recognizable as a Fountains Of Wayne© song. Have they grown? Yeah, but they've not taken giant steps into other dimensions like, let's  say, Radiohead.
It's your typical Catch-22 - go too different and your hard core fans may look elsewhere, keep repeating yourself over and over and your fanbase may outgrow you and look to new things and other artists. It's all about keeping things fresh and in being in touch with everything from current trends to knowing your fanbase. Who do they want to see you tour with? What other artists do they listen to and buy from. I think this is where it's so easy now with the ye old internet, to gauge what's happening musically on several different levels all at once. An artist can swing by Amazon and see that little deal that says "people who purchased REM's Accelerate also purchased" and peruse the list of other bands that their fans are also boppin' to. That may or may not have an impact on the next record, but the info is good to have regardless.
If I have time to do another review, I'm going to do one of a band called Panic At The Disco, which just released a new album that a lot of their old fans found insufferable, but the new sound has also been drawing in a ton of new listeners who've been talking up the new album's charms. For the record, they went from an album with a totally emo/pop punk sound to an album that's a '60s throwback pop record in the vein of the Beatles/Beach Boys.
I'll talk about this a little more when the REM review gets posted, as they have gone through some odd directions over the course of their career and have lost quite a few fans and sales because of some odd turns they've taken the past several years and are just now revisiting what made them so good to begin with...

Somewhere in my soul, there's always Rock -n- Roll... Joe Strummer

This story: 3 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment