Politics

War weariness shuts down West Coast ports, Mayor Flees in Panic!

pO157.

Posted to Politics on Fri May 02, 2008 at 06:21:12 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Demanding immediate withdrawal from Iraq, tens of thousands of workers refused to report to the docks today, halting international commerce along the West Coast.

Members of the politically active Internationals Longshore and Warehouse Union made good on their threat today to shut down trade along the west coast of the United States and Canada in protest of the war. Twenty nine ports were closed as 25,000 workers went on a pre-planned May Day strike. Ships were stuck in port as all loading and unloading was canceled.

Union President Bob McEllrath:

"Big foreign corporations that control global shipping aren't loyal or accountable to any countryFor them it's all about making money. But longshore workers are different. We're loyal to America, and we won't stand by while our country, our troops, and our economy are destroyed by a war that's bankrupting us to the tune of 3 trillion dollars. It's time to stand up, and we're doing our part today."

While the labor union stated the strike is due to the war and problems facing the country, management suspects it is a show of force prior to big contract talks. Management claims the union first announced only a symbolic, small, walkout, and then suddenly escalated it into a major disruption due to obtain leverage going into the talks.

Luckily for 'Soccer' Ma and Pa Kettle, Big Oil has private docks to service their refineries. They do not foresee any problems in their petroleum trade.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, strike, big oil, gas, oil, ma kettle, pa kettle, SUV, unions, labor, ports, longshoresmen, surly, civilization, war weariness, civil unrest (all tags)

This story: 19 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

(subqueue comment)

pO157.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 06:22:25 AM EST

5.00

WTF? How come this isn't in the mainstream press barely a day after it ended? They have been publicizing every minor possible disruption of gas. Since it didn't affect the gas supply chain, and because the protest wasn't about "ZOMG, German Nihilists and People Who Don't Use Magnetic Ribbons on their SUV or watching FOX NEWS are conspiring to steal our precious bodily fluids! Somebody pass a restriction on civil liberties attached to a massive deficit spending bill!" I guess they don't care.

It didn't even make CNN's US news, sub-regional page.

5

^ 1

mainstream media

profwhat.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 12:22:51 PM EST

4.00 (informative)

It's in the New York Times, LA Times, and the wire services.  Not too shabby.  

6

^ 5

Re: mainstream media

thefadd.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 12:35:43 PM EST

none

Great headlines and pics. Really show the power and dedication of the ILWU.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

3

^ 1

Re: (subqueue comment)

gerrymander.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 10:32:19 AM EST

1.00 (funny)

How come this isn't in the mainstream press barely a day after it ended?

In part, because a one-day delay in the delivery of goods just doesn't matter enough to cause a blip to the economy. It might have mattered somewhat if a large quantity of perishables or high-demand consumables (food, oil) were at risk, but dry goods? Not so much.

In part, because "Labor Union Workers Strike On May Day" stopped being news sometime back in the 1920s.

4

^ 3

Re: (subqueue comment)

pO157.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 12:17:06 PM EST

none

As logan pointed out in the subQ, this is the biggest demonstration against the war to date by organized labor. Although it happened on May Day, it is still significant due to its size and the workers' important position in commerce.

Say 25,000 cops took the day off to protest the war. Would that rate the headlines?

8

^ 4

Re: (subqueue comment)

gerrymander.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 01:37:28 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

Although it happened on May Day, it is still significant due to its size and the workers' important position in commerce.

I disagree. A labor-sponsored May Day strike isn't news just because somebody decides to slap "against the war" in the press release. It's still a May Day strike by organized labor. There are a plenitude of other non-May Day opportunities which labor organizers could have used to join an anti-war rally, but didn't -- including the one on the 5th anniversary of the war a few weeks back.

Say 25,000 cops took the day off to protest the war. Would that rate the headlines?

Sure -- but mostly because cops can't ever legally strike.

9

^ 8

Re: (subqueue comment)

pO157.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 02:00:27 PM EST

none

Sure -- but mostly because cops can't ever legally strike.

But like The Police (not the band), a strike by the longshoresmen could shut the country down. Actually, a long term strike by the dock workers would probably be worse to the country than a strike by the cops.

11

^ 9

Re: (subqueue comment)

gerrymander.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 04:33:51 PM EST

none

a strike by the longshoresmen could shut the country down.

Only over the medium-to-long term, as I noted above. Eventually, warehouses would deplete stockpiles of stuff, sure. And if the longshoremen's union timed the strike correctly, some industries could get hit hard (fashion in March or August, toys & holiday-themed items in October.) But a one-day strike just doesn't have the necessary impact for serious concern in an economy rich and diverse enough to withstand a few jitters. I mean, think about it: the nation already weathers work slowdowns every weekend without impact.

A one day strike by police, on the other hand, is an immediate problem because every person with a significant enough criminal intent would think, "Woo-hoo! Free day at Best Buy!" or worse.

12

^ 11

Re: (subqueue comment)

pO157.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 09:29:45 AM EST

none

A one day strike by police, on the other hand, is an immediate problem because every person with a significant enough criminal intent would think, "Woo-hoo! Free day at Best Buy!" or worse.

In the cities, maybe. Then again, we have the National Guard, police reserves, and neighbors watching out for each other. After a few retards getting capped or beaten down with tire irons I think the level of opportunism will drop. During/after Katrina the neighborhoods that banded together seemed to have less trouble than the ones that did not.

In the country... I don't think so. Perhaps rural TnTers like Port can speak up, but those places tended to be more independent anyway. Who needs cops when the homeowners are all heavily armed, and in the event of civil unrest will likely be moreso?

Just saying. I could be wrong.

14

^ 12

Re: (subqueue comment)

postillion.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:59:17 PM EST

4.00 (informative, astute)

A one day strike by police, on the other hand, is an immediate problem because every person with a significant enough criminal intent would think, "Woo-hoo! Free day at Best Buy!" or worse.

In the cities, maybe.

I was stuck in Manhattan during the large blackout, and was pleasantly surprised there was no looting or any problems besides being stuck inside my office building overnight.

Katrina was a different problem since there were masses of people who had lost their home and all their possessions, without any notion of what the future would look like.  

16

^ 14

Re: (subqueue comment)

gerrymander.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:00:55 PM EST

none

I was stuck in Manhattan during the large blackout, and was pleasantly surprised there was no looting or any problems besides being stuck inside my office building overnight.

Blackouts are a different game. The people and (many) communications lines are still in place for law enforcement, even if their capacity is strained. During a strike, everything would work normally, save the certainty that no help would arrive. Also, blackouts are generally an unexpected crisis, whereas strikes are coordinated in advance.

18

^ 16

Re: (subqueue comment)

postillion.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:23:16 PM EST

none

Blackouts are a different game. The people and (many) communications lines are still in place for law enforcement, even if their capacity is strained. During a strike, everything would work normally, save the certainty that no help would arrive. Also, blackouts are generally an unexpected crisis, whereas strikes are coordinated in advance.

Yes and no.

There wasn't any help arriving from the police during the blackout since there was no light anywhere at night, including traffic lights.  So, pretty much the police could not get to anyone except by foot in a completely dark city without any light.

Most cities depend on electricity to an extent that is fully realized when the electricity is no longer there: public transit, the street lights, elevators in skyscrapers, traffic signals, air conditioners, computers and everything dependent on computer signals.  So when the blackout hit, no one was going far unless those who decided to walk home in the middle of a very hot summer day.

If the strike day was announced fully in advance, maybe some people would take advantage of it.  But I also think that people overall are pretty civic-minded and not all beasts restrained by fear of the police.  It's possible that even if there was a police strike and some people tried to loot, other people on the street might stop them.  

13

^ 12

Re: (subqueue comment)

port1080.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:21:24 PM EST

none

Perhaps rural TnTers like Port can speak up, but those places tended to be more independent anyway. Who needs cops when the homeowners are all heavily armed, and in the event of civil unrest will likely be moreso?


...yeah...I mean, my parents don't hunt and aren't gun nuts or anything, but they still have about a dozen hand-me down guns from my grandparents.  I imagine that situation is pretty common.  It wouldn't shock me if well over 50% of the population in the township where I grew up are armed in some way.

15

^ 13

Re: (subqueue comment)

MC Nally.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:41:24 PM EST

none

...yeah...I mean, my parents don't hunt and aren't gun nuts or anything, but they still have about a dozen hand-me down guns from my grandparents.
That's nice.  Do they have any bullets?

17

^ 15

Re: (subqueue comment)

port1080.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:44:31 PM EST

none

Yes.

19

^ 15

Bullets for a shotgun?

pO157.

Sat May 03, 2008 at 05:11:20 PM EST

none

I have the opposite problem. I have a case of 12 gauge shells, various boxes of 12 gauge 00 buck, two gun cleaning kits, and a palette of clay pigeons in my garage or basement...... but no firearms.

Yes, I have several family members who are big into shooting.

10

^ 4

Re: (subqueue comment)

profwhat.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 02:59:56 PM EST

5.00 (informative)

This wasn't a war protest; Iraq was just a convenient excuse for a show of union force that was going to happen anyway.  "At the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on Thursday morning, however, there were no antiwar activities -- no protesters, no signs with antiwar sentiments and no indication of any large-scale opposition by dockworkers to U.S. policy in Iraq. The issue was discussed, union leaders said, during a private meeting of rank-and-file members at the ILWU Local 13 headquarters in Wilmington."

2

ZOMG! The dockworkers took a day off.

MayorBob.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 08:19:55 AM EST

5.00 (interesting)

I guess the impressive part of this is that the ILWU has the spunk to do something like this. The less impressive thing is that: 1. It's been in the works for weeks, 2. It was an orchestrated event, and 3. They only took a day off. In fact, they picked May Day, the "International Day To March For Something Or Other" (if you're part of the working class). They more than likely didn't give up a day's pay to do it, what with sick days, personal days and vacation days factored into their contracts with the terminals they work at. Read the main links in the writeup and it's either an opinion piece in a second-tier San Francisco paper or the Seattle paper. Now why would this only be the subject of what's basically a letter to the editor and go unreported in virtually any other of the mainstream media? Perhaps because even the mainstream media recognized manufactured news when they see it? Now, it might be more impressive if they'd decide to go on permanent work stoppage until we get out of Iraq, but the government would step in and make them work. But, a plus side to that would be giving Sean Hannitty the opportunity to go off the charts with anguish and outrage, wondering "why does labor and the liberals hate America" with a purple face and the veins popping out the sides of his neck.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

7

^ 2

Re: ZOMG! The dockworkers took a day off.

MC Nally.

Fri May 02, 2008 at 01:34:25 PM EST

5.00 (astute, funny, astute)

Perhaps because even the mainstream media recognized manufactured news when they see it?
Oh, Mayor, you crack me up..

This story: 19 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment