Business

Were Washington Insiders Laughing All the Way to the Bank?

pO157.

Posted to Business on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 12:56:31 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Embattled mortgage servicer and lender Countrywide is coming under fire again. This time, the outrage has also snared prominent politicians and lawmakers. The allegations? That the mortgage broker was offering cut rates and waiving fees for the politicians that regular people had no hope of getting.

Friends and patrons of Countrywide CEO/founder Angelo Mozilo were reportedly referred to the company "VIP Desk" where company mortgage officers would ensure they received preferential discounts and treatment. Insiders describe a situation where loans would be issued at such low rates that they would usually require points to be purchased. The fees for these points would be waived, as well as usual lender charges, and other costs usually passed along to the borrower.

According to magazine Conde Nast Porfolio, recipients of this favorable treatment include former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson, former Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, and former U.N. ambassador and assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke. One of the biggest fish snared among the friendly loan story is Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) who was given terms on two (4.25 and a 4.5%) mortgages that will save him $75,000 over the life of the loans.

The news of Dodd's loan terms came out as he prepares for a vote on the $300 Billion housing bailout he sponsored to "rescue" borrowers facing foreclosure. Countrywide also donated $21,000 to Dodd's campaigns over the last decade. His office denies any impropriety, although observers state they believe his once high chances of becoming Senator Obama's VP nominee are slim.

Another Senator snared includes Kent Conrad (D-ND), who has already agreed to pay $10,500 to charity to cover loan discounts he says he did not know he was receiving. Sources also say that Countrywide made loans to Senator Conrad to buy out his brothers' interests in an apartment building in Bismarck, even though Countrywide normally does not grant mortgages for apartment buildings. Senator Conrad said that he thought his low rates and waived fees might be due to his exceptionally high credit rating which he thought made him a good customer.

A Countrywide spokesperson said that people in the VIP program may not even have realized they were in it, and sometimes were justified in receiving below market rates because they were low credit risks.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, politics, mortgages, Countrywide, corruption, who knew? (all tags)

This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
3

There are two (2) ways to go on this

pO157.

Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 01:28:33 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

The first is ignorance. If Ma and Pa Kettle in the city can be excused for signing a horribly predatory lending deal and not getting a lawyer to explain the terms or even bothering to read the language then so should the Dodds, Conrads, etc. But if this is the case, do we really want a Senator who doesn't have an attorney review their contract or read and understand the mortgage text themselves to be in charge of writing law and approving foreign treaties? If these people were really so stupid as to not realize that rates ½, 1% or more below current market values were horribly low, and that the bottom line on his HUD-1 seemed a bit light, perhaps they should not be a position of authority where they have authority over the national spending? Or maybe this makes these Senators great examples of why the housing bailout should pass (it shouldn't). If even a lawmaker is too ignorant to understand a mortgage to the point where it looks blatantly obvious they took advantage of their position and got preferential terms then maybe everybody needs to be released from their contractual obligations with a massive taxpayer funded bailout. Everybody, of course, except for those who did their homework, found the best terms, didn't speculate on a risky unfixed variable rate, put a sizeable payment down for their home and only bought what they could afford. Those people don't deserve squat.

The second is that they knew what they were doing and thought the couple tens of thousands in savings would never be noticed and they believed they deserved the rate/fee cut. Slimey.

Either way, as port1080 says, perhaps they shouldn't be working in the public trust anymore.

Full disclosure: Originally I leaned toward Senator Dodd as the best choice for the Dems presidential nominee. I respected his stance on civil liberties and the retroactive immunity controversy. Now? Not so much.

4

^ 3

I'll take door #2...

HidingFromGoro.

Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 09:11:53 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

...since I can't think of any situation where an elected official shouldn't be held to a higher standard than Joe Average.

5

Re: Were Washington Insiders Laughing All the Way

Bryan Bytehead.

Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 10:16:22 PM EST

5.00 (interesting, informative)

As we are just finding out that McCain has a honey of a deal with Amex so that they don't charge him interest, even though the balance is like half a million.

I'll take that just on my piddling $5k card thank you.

1

How 'bout an Honor System?

port1080.

Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 01:04:48 PM EST

4.66 (astute, astute, astute)

I think we should have a system like many colleges do with cheating - relatively minimal oversight, but if you are caught cheating (or if you know someone is cheating but don't turn them in) you get kicked out immediately, first strike, no second chances.  Same should hold for politics - if you take money or bribes, if you receive favors, if you do anything inappropriate, and especially if you have a freezer full of cash (yes Mr. Jefferson, I'm looking at you) you should be out the door.  If that means we have to elect a whole new crop of Congresscritters every six months, well, so be it.  It's criminal how this is not only tolerated, but practically expected.  How can we criticize corruption in Africa or Asia when we let this garbage go on every day, right in front of our eyes?

2

^ 1

What's up with Mr. Freeze?

pO157.

Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 01:17:29 PM EST

none

Is he running for re-election -- if so, I would be interested to see if he gets it come November. Sometimes I wonder about Louisiana. The residents there seem to bemoan the corrupt officials like this guy, but they keep turning up in office. My dad used to live there (briefly) while growing up. He said he had a friend who got a brand new car for graduating 8th grade. The kids dad was supposedly the sheriff, and daddy paid the dealer cash.

Of course this was several decades ago and I would like to think corruption is not as obvious anymore.

6

Re: Were Washington Insiders Laughing All the Way

zyxwvutsr.

Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 10:08:17 PM EST

3.00 (funny)

Damn Republicans. Damn.

7

^ 6

Re: Were Washington Insiders Laughing All the Way

HidingFromGoro.

Thu Jun 19, 2008 at 03:27:59 AM EST

4.00 (funny, funny)

I know, the least Dodd could have done would be to have taken the $75,000 in cash and put it in the freezer.

This story: 7 comments (1 from subqueue)
Post a Comment