Legal

Home Invasions: Your own fault?

pO157.

Posted to Legal on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 06:03:26 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Very few things scare the average person as much as a story about violent, seemingly random home invasions, especially if it was in their own locale. While these attacks usually grab newspaper headlines far and wide, very few people say the victims were asking for it or brought it on themselves in some way. Very few, except for some police officials in Texas, who suggest that many of the  victims were at risk because of their lifestyle or were actually involved in illicit activities.

The JonBenet Ramsey case hit the headlines again this month as new DNA evidence suggested the crime could be the work of an intruder as one detective originally hypothesized. A letter from the District Attorney responsible for the case admitted that new DNA evidence had forced them to conclude that no member of the Ramsey household could have been involved. But some detectives told the Houston Chronicle that these types of situations are extremely rare. They argue that while individual horror stories of roving gang members armed to the teeth and invading random homes at gunpoint may occur, in all likelihood the victims are known to the attacker or are involved in some kind of crime that would attract unsavory characters.

Harris County, TX Detective Rolf Nelson relates the story of a recent high profile case of a man who allegedly murdered his wife but tried to blame a mysterious thief who broke in at random. Detective Nelson says that in his almost two decades of experience as a police officer that these nightmarish situations are very rare and unlikely. He estimates that 75% of all home invasions (a situation where a criminal or a gang of them breaks into a structure that is occupied; generally considered an extremely violent crime compared to other offenses) are gang or drug related where the victims brought it upon themselves by engaging in illegal activities. Most of the rest are due to thugs targeting law-abiding citizens known to have large amounts of cash on them, with the remaining 10% composing the actual random nightmare attack homeowners fear. For a county with over 3.4 million people, Detective Nelson's agency responded to 171 home invasions during the previous 18 months (although the number may actually be a bit higher because attacks where the residents were murdered are recorded as homicides, and events where the intruders flee before the officers arrival are recorded as simple burglary).

Margo Frasier, Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston University agrees. She says that most criminals don't want the hassle of dealing with an aggrieved homeowner. "They don't want anybody there because they really don't want the confrontation with the homeowner." When they do happen, she usually wonders what the victim did to precipitate the attack:

I wonder what the connection between the victim and the perpetrator is. It usually turns out that the person who does the home invasion has some kind of connection with the victim or a family member.

Even if the chances of an event occurring are quite slim, homeowners remain afraid. A recent survey in the United Kingdom demonstrated that the fear of a burglary is higher than any other, including identity theft or a disaster hitting an owners dwelling.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, home invasion, police (all tags)

This story: 14 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
3

Registration of Home Security Systems.

MayorBob.

Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 02:32:49 PM EST

5.00 (interesting)

We just received a letter from the County government informing everyone who has a home security system (either burglar or fire) that they have to register same with the county. The county claims that police have had to respond to too many false alarms and they want to keep track of alarm warnings in the future. If you continue to keep your system in your house but you fail to register the system, the county will assess you a fine for the first such false alarm, escalating to several hundred dollars if you reach the five false alarm threshhold. If you register your system, you get a mulligan for the first two such false alarms, but you get dinged the third time and up.

I called my councilperson (because this change to county regulations was passed without a great deal of fanfare) and asked what constituted a false alarm. He said that would be any time the police or fire responded to an alarm warning and it turned out there was no break in or fire. I presented him with experience we had with our alarm system which triggered a fire report when something my wife was broiling in the oven generated too much smoke and went off. As soon as we heard the alarm, we tried to dissipate the smoke and we called ADT. Even though our call to ADT was made almost immediately after the alarm began, the ADT operator said that the local fire company was already contacted and they were dispatching a truck. The fire company showed up and left once we told them what was up. My councilperson said that this would count as a false alarm because they did respond to the alarm. So, it looks like it's either maintain your alarm system and take the risk of getting dinged through no fault of your own or do away with it and take the risk of a home invasion or fire.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

5

^ 3

Re: Registration of Home Security Systems.

pO157.

Sun Jul 20, 2008 at 07:15:25 PM EST

none

I have had similar experiences. We have had two (2) false alarms since we moved in, and both were before we paid a shit ton of money (ok, maybe a grand or two) on security system upgrades, adding features and to replace faulty wiring and the like. One was a false alarm where it was clearly evident to the alarm dispatcher that it was a false one (multiple signals from the same door contact sensor within seconds) so we talked about it and I asked if we could cancel the cops since we were on our way home. He said the BPD policy was once they get called they can't be stopped. I took the bus and arrived at the same time as the cops. An hour later. The second was a few months later. We're still waiting for the police to show up on that alarm almost two years later. The alarm dispatcher says that is quite common.

Not only am I subject to fines starting at the 3rd false alarm which I completely understand and support, but I also have to pay a $10 a year alarm tax to the BPD. I thought the point of the massive fines for repeat violators (which I was never one) was to discourage idiots from having faulty system and to hire more officers to respond to false alarms. Then what is the point of an alarm tax? If alarms, shotguns or whatever is what it would take to encourage people to live in the city then why are there penalties for operating them in an a responsible manner that does not consume city services?

Now I see a bunch of private residences with surveillance cameras on the exterior. I wonder how long it will be until there is a private camera tax?

13

Re: Home Invasions: Your own fault?

joshv.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 07:38:17 PM EST

5.00 (informative)

Break-ins are just a fact of life where I live.  My unit has been broken into twice since I moved in (one time my wife and I woke up to a invader shining a flashlight in our faces), and we have at least one break-in a year in the other units of the building.  Last year an elderly occupant was attacked and beaten during a robbery.  As far as I know none of us are drug dealers, or involved in any other types of illicit activities.

I put it all down to living in a wealthy section of a large urban environment, surrounded by a sea of relative poverty.  Buses and trains make it easy for them to get from their neighborhood to mine.  I now have a security system, upgraded window bars, and recently the building built the back porch security fences about 10 feet higher.  But it's not just our building, I have many friends who have also suffered robberies.  And these days there is no safe time of the day for a robbery when the thief can assume nobody is home.  Too many people work from home, or on flex schedules.

1

Re: Home Invasions: Your own fault?

thefadd.

Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 02:33:43 PM EST

none

The prospect of home invasion is a very scary thing. Identity theft does not immediately effect our physical selves and we'd like to think that most disasters offer some warning time. That said, it does seem to me anecdotally that most home invasions originate with intruders who were somehow previously aware of the place they're breaking into. Of course, that makes all the more reason that police should not mimic the invasion style in many of their no-knock warrant services.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

2

Re: Home Invasions: Your own fault?

ckm.

Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 02:09:57 PM EST

none

Well, it's actually happened to me twice.   Once some random guy showed up in our back yard at 1am.   We called the cops, but the guy disappeared before they had a chance to catch him. The other time someone kicked in a screen at 9am on a Monday.   My wife(!) ran the guy out of the house and down the street.  I was a useless male as I did not have my glasses on and was in my underwear.

Obviously, both of these incidents were not intended to be a home invasion, but still.   They occurred because the garbage collectors left an alley door that leads to our back yard open.   I also live in the middle of a city, next to a park where homeless types sleep, about six blocks from projects and one block from a hospital where the police regularly dumps drunks and druggies.  There are constantly people trying to find an open door either on a car or house, so it's more opportunistic than a 'home invasion'.  Oh, and I don't do drugs or have large sums of cash at home.   And I don't really have expensive stuff other than computers.

Needless to say, we have changed the locks so the garbage people can't come in anymore and we put a gate at the end of the alley.  We haven't had any problems since then.

Chris.

4

^ 2

Re: Home Invasions: Your own fault?

skeeter1.

Sun Jul 20, 2008 at 01:02:51 PM EST

none

"Well, it's actually happened to me twice."

To the best of my knowledge, it's only happened to me once, and I know who it was and why.  The neighborhood juvenile delinquent left his skateboard ramp in my driveway overnight, and I put it in my garage until trash day, and tried getting in my front door.  Good thing he didn't make it in, because I've got more than a few lead-injectors, and I'm not afraid to use one.  I've only been shooting for 51 years, but I'm pretty-darned good at it.  

I still think the best thing is what my buddy has -- a 95lb Doberman-Pinscher.  I get along with the dog just fine, but lord help a stranger who breaks in there.  That's one big alarm system and defender, all in one.

there's only one way to find out...

6

There is no tax on necessities.

pO157.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 11:31:06 AM EST

none

Many states don't put a sales tax on clothing, food, toilet paper, etc.

My alarm is subject to sales tax on installation, parts, labor, monitoring and a yearly alarm tax. One of the alarm guys that came over for a recent upgrade got to talking and he said my neighbor was insane for living in the city without an alarm of some kind. I have heard many people suggest that owning a home in a high crime area necessitates an alarm of some kind. I agree.

Then why are those systems taxed if they are a basic necessity? Then again my state taxes clothing and the like, so who knows.

7

^ 6

Re: There is no tax on necessities.

skeeter1.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 03:18:22 PM EST

none

"Then why are those systems taxed if they are a basic necessity? Then again my state taxes clothing and the like, so who knows."

The only thing that my state (Ohio) doesn't tax (yet) is food.  They tax everything else.  7.75% sales tax, $3600/yr property tax, electric tax, phone tax, liquor tax, gasoline tax, hunting and fishing licenses, etc.  All tax.  

The next one (if they can figure out how to manage it) will no doubt be a tax on internet purchases.  

there's only one way to find out...

8

^ 7

Good times. Good times.

pO157.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 03:34:21 PM EST

none

Or a tax on paying tax. I shouldn't joke, my city is already there. Want to pay your property (or other) taxes online? That's a $3 or 2% fee, whichever is greater.

9

^ 8

Re: Good times. Good times.

thefadd.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 06:55:03 PM EST

none

The online fees from some of these city and municipal services are absolutely ridiculous. I've seen fees as much as $10 and $15 just to make a transaction happen online, amounting to well over 10%.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

10

^ 9

Re: Good times. Good times.

pO157.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 07:19:35 PM EST

none

It is such a scam, isn't it? I even contacted my council rep about it, and their response was along the lines of "Well, how else can the city recoup the costs of using Visa?" Because its not like companies put those costs into price structures.

It would be laughable if they didn't give an interview to the media earlier talking about how the online payment scheme saves so many man hours in the office. Apparently all the government workers that used to process payments manually are no longer needed. Yet somehow they are losing money on the deal. Amazing.

11

^ 10

Re: Good times. Good times.

thefadd.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 07:25:42 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

Yeah--it's not like their cost could possibly exceed $.35 + 3% unless they have the absolute worst credit card processing deal in the history of commerce. The last rationale I heard was from a department claiming they needed the extra money to maintain their computer systems. Which, I suppose I should cut them a break on since right now their online system is only accessible during "regular business hours"...and they wonder why people begin to support outsourcing.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

12

^ 11

Re: Good times. Good times.

pO157.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 07:29:35 PM EST

none

Does it really go as high as 3%? I had no idea. That's crazy. So even with those airline miles cards the processors and banks are raking it in, even before paying out rewards and collecting interest.

No wonder they call Delaware the "Small Wonder." The whole state is probably kept above sea level by giant dollar sign bags buried there by MBNA and Bank of America.

14

^ 12

Re: Good times. Good times.

thefadd.

Mon Jul 21, 2008 at 08:10:30 PM EST

none

Oh, yeah. Honestly, I could be low. I don't remember any longer--it must be American Express or Discover--but one of the credit card companies has a no fee policy, just a percentage that can be as high as 4 or 5% per transaction which is why it's not accepted as widely. One of my banks pays me something like 2.5% cash back on every purchase I make using my bank card in a signature based transaction because that earns them more cash than if I used the safer pin based alternative, for which they don't pay me. If you have a bank card associated with a paypal account, paypal charges you 3% on all money coming into your account but rebates 1.5% on all signature based card transactions on the same premise.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

This story: 14 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment