Politics

Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) Under Indictment [Breaking News!]

pO157.

Posted to Politics on Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 02:05:52 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

About a year after the Justice Department raided the home of the senior senator from Alaska, Mr. Stevens has found himself under indictment. Sources report he stands accused of seven counts related to official corruption.

Senator Stevens is the longest serving GOP senator, having been in office for almost forty years. While his career in the Senate is certainly long and memorable his most recent hijinx include the "Bridge to Nowhere" funding fiasco and a bizarre speech in which he defined the internet as a "Series of Tubes."

The charges are expected to stem from his alleged acceptance of free contracting work on his house in exchange for his influence in an oil services deal involving VECO corp.

There is no comment from GOP leadership or Alaska politicians yet. Earlier this month Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) had requested the resignation of a GOP state senator who had found himself ensnared in a similar corruption scandal. Senator Stevens was already expected to face a challenger in the August GOP primary. It is unknown if he plans to remain in office while fighting the charges or intends to resign.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by pO157, politics (all tags)

This story: 11 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

About time

gerrymander.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 04:51:16 PM EST

5.00 (astute)

Good. Stevens has been a festering boil on the Republican party for far too long. The sooner he's out of the Senate, the better.

11

^ 1

Re: About time

JimmyHavok.

Thu Jul 31, 2008 at 04:56:33 AM EST

4.00 (funny, astute)

If Stevens is a festering boil on the Republican Party, then the entire party consists of little more than festering boils.

3

This is not good

Lou.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 05:25:44 PM EST

5.00 (funny, funny)

I feel really bad about the corruption charge.  What a horrible thing to go through.  My thoughts go out to him, his family, and his many constituents.

It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

4

^ 3

Re: This is not good

MC Nally.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 06:29:48 PM EST

5.00 (informative)

I feel really bad about the corruption charge.  What a horrible thing to go through.  My thoughts go out to him, his family, and his many constituents.
I'm one of his constituents and trust me, I feel just fine about this.  We've had a lot of practice up here in recent years at watching political leaders get indicted due to their involvement with Bill Allen and VECO, and frankly the only part of this indictment that comes as a real surprise is that Ted Stevens was indicted before his son Ben (before you spare too much sympathy for the family I suggest you read up on Ben first.)

I suppose the other surprising part is that after two years the DOJ has decided they have a strong enough case to proceed against Ted.  The situation involving the Girdwood home renovation was big news a year or two ago (when the last round of search warrants were executed against Stevens) but the general consensus was that due to his very substantial influence in state and national politics the feds would not tangle with Stevens unless / until he was caught dead-to-rights.  I guess now we'll see.

5

^ 3

Is this Bizarro Week on TnT?

MayorBob.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 06:30:21 PM EST

none

You're expressing sympathy for Stevens while Gerry is kicking him out of the door.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

7

^ 5

Re: Is this Bizarro Week on TnT?

delete me.

Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 02:36:52 AM EST

none

Check his comment on the Novak story. :P

- derumi (del-me)
"Bobby Fischer? Man, that guy is crazy!" - Mike Tyson

8

waiting for the evidence

wetkarma.

Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 05:07:18 AM EST

5.00 (interesting, interesting)

I doubt that this prosecution is politically driven, but this case seems awfully thin to me. He's not charged with accepting work on his house for votes (bribery), he's charged Clinton-style with lying (by omission) about the work.

Steven's position is that he paid for all work done.

And I can see how that might be true. A few years ago (while I lived in Atlanta), a major storm came through and blew down a few trees on my property. A tree removal service came by and I hired them on the spot to remove the trees and associated stumps (incidentally stump removal is about as costly as tree removal). 6 years or so (and 3 addresses) later, I got an invoice from them for their services. If you had asked me prior to receiving that invoice, I would have said with fair certainty that I must have paid the bill; I certainly had no intention of getting 'free work' from these contractors but until they sent me a bill, I didn't recall that I had an outstanding obligation.

Now were I a public official, it would certainly look like I was taking 'gifts' from this service company. The difference between a gift and bad accounting sometimes being in the eyes of the beholder and is probably indictable. However to charge me with failing to disclose something I didn't recall -- well that seems like overreach to me.

Maybe its hollywood that leads people to believe that the villainous politician must not only be wrong on the issues, but corrupt too. I'm no fan of Sen. Stevens (heck pretty much all incumbent politicians), but just because I don't like him doesn't mean he's corrupt.

The Justice Department will have to make a solid case for me to believe that a sitting US senator would throw his career and reputation away for a couple hundred k.

Memory is a strange bell, jubilee and knell.

9

^ 8

Re: waiting for the evidence

zyxwvutsr.

Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 08:00:48 AM EST

5.00 (astute, interesting)

...a major storm came through and blew down a few trees on my property. A tree removal service came by and I hired them...
Can you see how it might look somewhat more suspicious if you received a Land Rover and home construction and renovations from a firm that specializes in industrial infrastructure?

10

^ 8

Re: waiting for the evidence

thefadd.

Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 02:11:31 PM EST

none

It's true that he is charged with the more easily provable false statements. The government has been investigating him for a couple years now and they're not going through with the more difficult to prove bribery charge. Whoever it is, that's how prosecutors work--they press with what they feel they can make stick. From a political perspective, the information seems pretty damning so I'm not reading all that much into what they decided to charge him with beyond my usual assumption that a prosecutor is as sleazy as a politician any day.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

2

Ted Stevens -- Going Down The Tubes Fast.

MayorBob.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 05:10:25 PM EST

none

Here's some research into public support for Stevens, Begich and Palin taken last year. It looks like the governor does quite well going up against the other two. It also looks like Begich's negatives were a lot lower than Stevens back then. I have to believe this indictment has got to be the nail in his political coffin.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

6

^ 2

Re: Ted Stevens -- Going Down The Tubes Fast.

MC Nally.

Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 06:44:10 PM EST

5.00 (interesting)

Here's some research into public support for Stevens, Begich and Palin taken last year. It looks like the governor does quite well going up against the other two.
It would be interesting to see how Palin's numbers have changed in the past year, as she has had some backlash recently over the replacement of Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan which has tarnished her so-far clean image.  (I don't know whether the charges are credible or not, but as I understand it Monegan claims he was removed from his job over a dispute with Palin, who wanted him to dismiss her sister's ex-husband from his job as an Alaska State Trooper.)
It also looks like Begich's negatives were a lot lower than Stevens back then. I have to believe this indictment has got to be the nail in his political coffin.
It certainly looks bad for Stevens but I wouldn't count him out just yet.  There are plenty of Alaskans who don't like him but who respect (and in many cases depend on) his ability to secure federal funding for the state, as well as a fairly powerful party apparatus in state politics.  Much depends on whether the party depends to bet on Stevens and back him heavily or not.  They don't always go for the incumbent up here -- in our last general state election then-incumbent-governor Frank Murkowski came in third in his party's (Republican) primary.  Alaska politics is a pretty complicated game.

Unquestionably this will give a big credibility boost to Begich's candidacy, which was already doing pretty decently.   I wouldn't pronounce it a guarantee of victory by any means, though.

This story: 11 comments (4 from subqueue)
Post a Comment