Perhaps the most unsafe place to be after a primary season is between Obama and the middle of the road.
Obama an agent of change? Ok. Sure.
The problem isn't so much Obama as it is the system itself, or perhaps democracy in general. Plato was one of the first, if certainly not the last, to argue that sometimes what the people want isn't always the best policy. As much as I dislike this legislation, it's not surprising to me that it passed. It was crafted in such a way that it could be sold as a middle-of-the-road compromise (although you and I might argue that it's not) and I think it's fair to say that most voters, if they think much about this at all, will think "well if it protects us from the terr'rists it must be good!" Civil liberties issues (other than religion and gun rights!), particularly abstracts ones like this, rarely win anyone an election - but being seen as soft on terror may well LOSE you an election (which, I'm sure, is the calculation Obama made on this).
If the American public truly cared about this as an issue the vote would have gone the other way. The sad, annoying fact is that they don't, so you get what you get. Congress or Bush didn't "fool" the public over this one - it got press coverage enough, and if people really were up in arms about it and wrote their Senators and what have you it would have played out differently (if there's one thing Congressmen pay attention to, it's spontaneous writing campaigns by their constituents - they know that if an issue gets people pissed off enough to actually take the time to write a letter, that it's something that might haunt them the next time elections roll around...). Frankly, I'm starting to think that we're fortunate that our government is as good as it is. Considering the level of political awareness of your average American, and the things that it's pretty clear people generally base their vote on (simple name recognition, "magic hair", ephemeral impressions, simple party affiliation), it's a wonder we've made it as far as we have.
4
3
|
He meant non-violent grassroots political action
Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 10:55:45 AM EST
3.00 (astute)
|
If the American public truly cared about this as an issue the vote would have gone the other way. The sad, annoying fact is that they don't, so you get what you get. Congress or Bush didn't "fool" the public over this one - it got press coverage enough, and if people really were up in arms about it and wrote their Senators and what have you it would have played out differently (if there's one thing Congressmen pay attention to, it's spontaneous writing campaigns by their constituents - they know that if an issue gets people pissed off enough to actually take the time to write a letter, that it's something that might haunt them the next time elections roll around...). Frankly, I'm starting to think that we're fortunate that our government is as good as it is.
You know what pisses me off most about this? When I go on local political discussion forums they are always full of psychotic whackjobs who sit around and bitch (in all lowercase, poorly spelled hyperbolic drivel) about the government. Usually tangents lead to racist commentary and demands for armed revolution for some reason.
I come in and try to have an intelligent discussion. I ask if there is anything that could be done besides sitting around being Internet Tough Guys and spouting off threatening, poorly worded crap. Did they write letters to the editor to air their grievances? Write their representatives? Learn which candidates or parties most closely match their own? Start a petition? Hell, even vote? No. That's too much effort. It's better to sit around, drink 7 light beers, and then fire up the 14.4 modem to advocate armed revolution to fellow Internet Tough Guys because 'teh speculators are stealing our gases! ZOMG!' Invariably I end up being the one that gets flamed.
Heaven forbid anybody actually does anything constructive by working within the system for the change they desire. I blame the schools.
Then again, maybe its just the fact I live in a dystopian shithole.
7
4
|
fuck off subject-line parser script
Thu Jul 10, 2008 at 09:25:12 PM EST
|
See also: Internet Tough Guy; Internet Tough Guy.
Q: What do you think of western civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.