Music

The Greatest Music Collection Nobody Wants.

MayorBob.

Posted to Music on Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 01:34:26 PM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Paul Mawhinney would like to free up a bit of shelf space. Actually, he'd like to free up a lot of space -- enough space to store more than 3 million vinyl albums, EPs, and singles totalling 6 million tunes. The 69-year-old Pittsburgh man says what he has is the greatest music collection anywhere. He's had it appraised at (US)$50 million. But he says he'd take $3 million. Unfortunately, he hasn't found anyone willing to pay nearly that much for it.

Mawhinney suffers from diabetes and is legally blind and just wants to get rid of the collection. However, he's run into problems selling it. Back in February, an ebay auction fell through when the winning bidder turned out to be bogus. The entire saga of the declining value of the collection looks like Murphy has been in charge of the sale. Mawhinney's woes include a $28.5 million deal being blown due to the dotcom bubble burst, troubles with his landlord, being stiffed by movie producers, the Library of Congress expressing interest and then losing interest in buying the collection due to budget cutbacks to this latest ebay auction debacle.

Mawhinney created his collection during the time he owned Record-Rama. Every time he got down to a final album in stock, it became an addition to his archive. Close to 40 years of doing this resulted in the collection. It's a collection that music industry insider Ed Salamon calls unparalleled:

"There are a number of collectors throughout the country that maintain archives. But I've never seen anything to compare with what Paul has been able to put together."
Salamon says if Mawhinney hadn't compiled his collection, the music would have been lost to American culture. Mawhinney is still bitter over the way the Library of Congress turned out: "They broke my heart. They broke my spirit. And I told them they could never call me again." And now, after the ebay thing and still nobody expressing interest, Mawhinney says "nobody gives a damn."

What might be lessening the interest is the sheer space requirements for such a collection. That, and the fact that most people collecting music are into digital music and not metric tons of vinyl. But, that doesn't mean the albums, EPs and singles housed in his collection wouldn't have some value. After all, cover art is considered almost like works of art. Even covers which have a Medusa effect when you gaze upon them, have curiosity (if not financial) value. There are even some collectors who are less than sympathetic to Mawhinney and his plight, faulting him for overestimating what the collection is worth and playing loose with the truth about how the music couldn't be found any other way.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, record albums, museum, ebay, collections, value of collections, Library of Congress, album cover art, bad album covers (all tags)

This story: 5 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
1

Re: The Greatest Music Collection Nobody Wants.

skeptic.

Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 02:57:18 PM EST

none

Three million albums, my goodness.  Nobody would even have the time to look through them to see if there are any that are particularly of interest.  I would suggest that instead of offering them for sale as a collection, Mawhinney could list them all alphabetically on e-bay so that people who are interested in a specific album could just buy that album.  Of course, just typing up a list of three million albums would be tremendously difficult (even aside from the fact that Mawhinney is now legally blind) and would require a considerable clerical staff to get it done, and I'm sure he wouldn't want to spend the money to do that.

I also own a very interesting music collection, mostly recorded on audio cassettes.  I would never sell it.  I imagine that at after my death, it will probably just be thrown out, since relatively few people still want music in the obsolete format of audio tape, and in any event, my tapes have even less historical interest than Mawhinney's albums, which at least have interesting cover art.

2

^ 1

Re: The Greatest Music Collection Nobody Wants.

MayorBob.

Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 03:30:31 PM EST

none

You mean to tell us that nobody from the planet Vulcan would be interested in hearing any of your music collection? That's illogical.

Illegitimi non carborundum.

4

^ 2

Re: The Greatest Music Collection Nobody Wants.

skeptic.

Sat Aug 23, 2008 at 08:38:15 AM EST

none

My music collection is quite interesting, and lots of people, from various planets, would be interested in hearing it.  That is not the issue.  The question is, do the inhabitants of the planet Vulcan possess audio cassette equipment?  Or do they use other systems for recording and playing music?  That is the problem.

Of course, my music is transferable to other systems.  I just haven't bothered to do it.  I am satisfied with the system that I have.

3

Old vinyl

skeeter1.

Fri Aug 22, 2008 at 08:21:40 PM EST

none

I've got a couple of large boxes full, mostly from the 60's, 70's, and early 80's.  After that, I went CD.  Now, I can download MP3s off the 'net for free.  So what's the old vinyl worth?  I'd guess maybe $1/ea.  I might well be wrong, but I'm not about to go looking for any more.  

Let's do the math:  Old vinyl, $1. S&H, $10.  MP3 download, free.  Hmmm...

there's only one way to find out...

5

^ 3

Re: Old vinyl

skeptic.

Mon Aug 25, 2008 at 11:12:03 AM EST

none

Based purely on music content, old vinyl would seldom be of much value.  But some albums are collectible.

This story: 5 comments (2 from subqueue)
Post a Comment