Are mobile and cordless phones the secondhand smoke of the 21st century?
Degee.
Posted to SciTech on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 06:33:51 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.
I have just purchased a cordless phone to replace an old beater of a cord phone that I held onto for years. Suddenly I find myself questioning the effect of whatever is radiating from these wireless devices. (I am getting a little more safety conscious lately because my partner and I are expecting our first child in September.)
A little poking around on the intertubes turned up a study by Professor Lennart Hardell and Professor Kjell Hansson Mild in the peer-reviewed journal Occupational Environmental Medicine basically intimating that using a mobile phone for more than 10 years at one hour a day increases the risk of getting brain cancer. Hardell and Mill's study has also called in question the exposure to cell phone type radiation of kids due to their thinner skull casing and developing nervous systems. In the UK, one in three children aged from seven to 11 now owns a mobile
Other studies, such as one conducted last year by the MTHR (Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) programme say there is no connection between mobile cell use and health problems, although they are embarking on a 20 to 30 year follow-up study this year. The World Health Organization concurs , saying the RF (radio frequency fields) of cell phones pose no significant health threats.
There are cries that organisations such as MTHR are in conflict of interest since they are funded by"industry".
There are the usual fear mongers looking for a fast buck as well as the health conspiracy theorists and the homeopathists.
Wifi, cordless, mobiles: are they safe to have in the house? Are kids with cells phones in danger? Is using earpiece cellphones tantamount to cultivating brain cancer? Is there a sane level of precaution we can take without becoming Luddites ?
< The Palin Shocker: McCain's New VP Choice [Breaking]
It's Not Sex, It's SeXXXercise! >
