Business

What's In A Naming Right?

MayorBob.

Posted to Business on Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 06:27:23 AM EST (promoted by port1080). RSS.

Two National Football League clubs, the Giants and the Jets call Giant Stadium in the Meadowlands home.  They will still be sharing a home stadium when Giant Stadium is replaced by a new stadium in 2010.  What to call it is creating a major stir up in New York these days.  No, it's not going to be a toss between Giant or Jets Stadium.  The controversy surrounds the result of naming rights negotiations with a major insurance company.  On the one hand you have those who are upset that a company which used to insure the Auschwitz concentration camp might end up on the side of the building.  Then there are those who say, hasn't enough time passed since that unpleasantness?

Allianz of America is the insurance holding company that negotiated with the New Meadowlands Stadium Corporation (NMSC) for the naming rights to the (US)$1.3 billion, 82,000-seat facility (pdf doc).  Like most recent stadium deals, the stadium is getting built through a combination of state and private money.  The NMSC hoped to get $20 to $30 million per year from Allianz.  The problem is that it turns out the parent of the American company has a bit of a checkered past.  More than six decades before, the parent company Allianz was into insuring German properties.  Two of its major contracts covered facilities and personnel at Dachau and Auschwitz.  And, its CEO also served as Hitler's economics minister.

The company was never as closely tied to Nazi fortunes as VW or Krupp, but Allianz spent a good bit of time following WWII dodging any responsibility for much of what it was involved in.  True enough, the company did finally agree to restitution of slave labor and death camp victims.  It also agreed to open up inquiries into its history and opened an exhibition which examines this past.  Peter Lefkin, a vice president at Allianz of America, said the company's "record of trying to redress the evils of the Third Reich have been significant over the years."  Rabbi Jay Rosenbaum of the North American Board of Rabbis concurs with that:

"I have found Allianz to be receptive, to be sensitive and a friend of the Jewish people today.  We need not live in the past."
Needless to say, not everyone shares Lefken's or Rosenbaum's feelings.  The Anti-Defamation League certainly doesn't; it called the notion of using Allianz's name on the stadium "inappropriate and an insult to the memory of Holocaust victims."  Elan Steinberg, an official with a Holocaust survivor organization, said the NMSC must show a little sensitivity.  Considering the fact so many survivors live in the New York metropolitan area, "it would not be appropriate to affix the Allianz name to a stadium name" in that area.  The NMSC says they have done a "rigorous due diligence effort" to understand the concerns and they and the teams ownerships were "sensitive to Allianz's history." Still, at the end of the day all of this wasn't enough - last Saturday the NMSC backed out of talks with Allianz, and will be seeking new sponsorship for the stadium.

Tags: edited by Port1080, written by MayorBob, NFL, Giant Stadium, naming rights, German insurance company, Holocaust, Auschwitz, money (all tags)

This story: 6 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment
5

Your cooperation, please.

Shy Elf.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 08:05:29 PM EST

5.00 (funny, astute)

When a public municipality like United Headquarters City is asked to build a stadium with public money, it would be simply a waste of Nike money not to strike the Nikest deal possible for the Nike taxpayers of this city by utilizing all sources of revenue at our disposal.  It is, to be sure, a slight inconvenience.  Why, just last week, right here on Toyota Avenue, I was ignorantly asked for directions to "Maple Hill Elementary School," the former name of McDonald's Elementary School, by someone who was lost because they did not know that the name had changed.  Nevertheless, the modest confusion caused by repeated name changes pales in comparison to the revenue they bring our Nike city.

Therefore, I implore all the Nike residents of our city, that, in order to preserve name licensing as a Nike source of revenue for future generations of United Headquarters Citians, it is vital that we remember to actually use the correct names in our conversation.  Please remember that U. S. Cellular Field is no longer "Comiskey Park", and it is most definitely not "The Sox' Park".  Wrigley Field, I remind you, is "Wrigley Field" and not "Wrigley Field".

And above all, I would like to remind all the Nike residents of United Headquarters City to take special care to remember that word formerly known as "good" is now "Nike".

Thank you for your cooperation.  

6

^ 5

Re: Your cooperation, please.

thefadd.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 08:46:08 PM EST

none

Nike was always my favorite greek goddess anyway.

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

1

Re: What's In A Naming Right?

Bryan Bytehead.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 08:16:43 AM EST

none

I don't know.  In my neck of the woods, we have <strike>Alltel</strike> Jacksonville Municipal Stadium.  It's the second year that we haven't had our stadium named (not even Jaguar Stadium, which I find amusing, but then that might be a reference to the car maker, not the team) and it's looking like it won't either.

3

^ 1

Re: What's In A Naming Right?

MayorBob.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 09:00:40 AM EST

none

When Villanova University was building a sports facility back in the early 90s, the major benefactor was John E. Dupont, one of the scions to the chemical company's founding families (and a major college wrestling fan).  When the new facility was opened, it was called the John E. Dupont Pavilion.

The facility had that name up until 1997, in spite of numerous incidents of Dupont's strange behavior (eg, sexual harassment and pointing a loaded weapon at someone), when when he was convicted of murder.  Thereafter, the facility has been known simply as "the Pavilion."

When the Philadelphia Flyers and 76ers needed an upgrade from their home at the Spectrum, they went out and built the arena currently known as the Wachovia Center.  This is the third name the building has had since opening in 1996.  For the first couple of years, it was known as the CoreStates Center after the bank which had earned the naming rights by putting up oodles of money.  When CoreStates was bought out by another bank in 1998, it was changed to reflect the new ownership -- First Union bank.  Any number of people had fun with the acronym the new name produced -- FUC -- but that was lost in 2003 when Wachovia bought out First Union.  Given the volatile nature of the banking industry today, it might not be long before the arena changes its name to the name of whatever bank buys Wachovia.  Or, perhaps, nobody will buy Wachovia and it can be renamed the "Chapter 11 Center."

Illegitimi non carborundum.

2

Re: What's In A Naming Right?

skeptic.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 08:59:10 AM EST

none

What, indeed, is in a naming right?  I personally find it impossible to believe that spending 20 to 30 million dollars a year to get a stadium named after any company would constitute an effective use of advertising dollars.  Alternatively, they could buy ads in TV, magazines, the internet or whatever, in which they actually offer some reason why consumers should buy their product.  Merely putting a name on a stadium doesn't offer any such reasons.

Other than that, the unfortunate aspects of Allianz's past have been dealt with, the reparations have been paid, and it's over.  These people are not Nazis, despite the fact that their company did business with Nazis 63 years ago (and no one who worked at Allianz 63 years ago still works there today; they have all retired or died by now).  I wonder if the people who take objection to the Allianz insurance company would also like to take all the Volkswagons off the road.  It's pointless.

4

^ 2

Re: What's In A Naming Right?

thefadd.

Tue Sep 16, 2008 at 07:46:13 PM EST

none

Typically, the name rights come with a package wherein they also get their logo all over the stadium, on tickets at other events relating to the team, etc. The $$$ have come down in recent years but I gotta believe if they keep doing it, they keep feeling like it's worth. In the case of [Giants] Stadium, you've got TWO teams in the #1 sport in America in the #1 media market in the country. The stadium's name is going to get mentioned not just every game but every highlight, every schedule run down, every time somebody does the football related weather...

It is easy to buy small plaster models of what you think life is like.

This story: 6 comments (7 from subqueue)
Post a Comment